Interpreting E-Government: Implementation as the Moment of Truth

The dematerialisation of the document flows received and sent by the public administrations (PAs) is one of the main cornerstones of the Italian e-government programme. The empirical data relative to the diffusion of the new document management systems reveal that today less than half of Italy's central PAs have attained an adequate level of project advancement in terms of the Computerised Correspondence Register (the system whereby each document is automatically filed and retrieved), despite the fact that the deadline for compliance was 1 January 2004. The paper develops a number of reflections to understand the idea of change that guided first the legislator and then the monitoring authority. The thesis advanced is that also when implementation seems problematic, the rhetoric of managerialism dominates the e-government discourse. Through our reconceptualisation we argue that e-government reveals its organisational implications only when the statements of principle are translated into concrete actions and decisions.

[1]  Jane E. Fountain,et al.  Paradoxes of Public Sector Customer Service , 2001 .

[2]  Marie des Neiges Baudry de Vaux,et al.  Bruno Maggi, De l'agir organisationnel : un point de vue sur le travail, le bien-être, l'apprentissage, Toulouse, Octarès, (Travail et activité humaine), 2003 , 2004 .

[3]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  PAYOFFS FROM COMPUTERIZATION - LESSONS OVER TIME , 1990 .

[4]  Peter C. Smith,et al.  Outcome‐related Performance Indicators and Organizational Control in the Public Sector1 , 1993 .

[5]  J. Chandler.  Questioning the New Public Management , 2004 .

[6]  G. Masino,et al.  Information technology and dilemmas in organizational learning , 1999 .

[7]  Tony Cornford,et al.  ICT, Innovation and Public Management: Governance, Models & Alternatives for E-Government Infrastructures , 2005, ECIS.

[8]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[9]  G. Watson.  Resistance to Change , 1971 .

[10]  Giovanni Masino,et al.  Information technology artefacts as structuring devices in organizations: design, appropriation and use issues , 2003, Interact. Comput..

[11]  Eric B. Dent,et al.  Challenging “Resistance to Change” , 1999 .

[12]  David Landsbergen,et al.  Realizing the Promise: Government Information Systems and the Fourth Generation of Information Technology , 2001 .

[13]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Walking atop the cliffs: avoiding failure and reducing risk in large scale e-government projects , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[14]  Marco de Marco,et al.  Sowing the seeds of IS cultivation in public service organisations , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[15]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[16]  C. May,et al.  Interaction between States and Citizens in the Age of the Internet: “e-Government” in the United States, Britain, and the European Union , 2003 .

[17]  S. Piderit.  Rethinking Resistance and Recognizing Ambivalence: A Multidimensional View of Attitudes Toward an Organizational Change , 2000 .

[18]  Zahir Irani,et al.  IS Evaluation in the UK Public Sector: Emerging Research Themes and Issues , 2003, AMCIS.