All Pump, No Dump? The Impact Of Internet Deception On Stock Markets

Internet users are confronted with an increasing amount of deceptive contents. Thereby, especially pump and dump manipulations published via e-mail or within the web represent an important problem. Here, deceivers advertise stocks to profit from an increased price level. Within recent years, market surveillance authorities and software vendors have taken several countermeasures against such fraudulent stock recommendations. At the same time, deceivers have constantly updated their tactics when pursuing their campaigns. Thus, we investigate whether recent suspicious stock recommendations still have an impact on stock markets. We find that current pump and dump campaigns have a positive stock market impact and that they are followed by a decline in stock prices within the subsequent days. We enhance the previous understanding by examining whether spam campaign characteristics also influence the succeeding market reaction. In this context, positive sentiment expressed and the number of stock recommendations published have a positive impact. Consequently, market surveillance authorities and investors should be aware of the related risks and software vendors should consider campaign characteristics within their software to detect suspicious behavior.

[1]  H. Sexton Advertising , 1898, The American Journal of Dental Science.

[2]  Hubert A. Zielske The Remembering and Forgetting of Advertising , 1959 .

[3]  Clark Leavitt,et al.  Advertising Wearout: An Experimental Analysis , 1976 .

[4]  R. Weber Basic Content Analysis , 1986 .

[5]  R. E. Burnkrant,et al.  Effects of Repeating Varied Ad Executions on Brand Name Memory , 1991 .

[6]  G. Tellis Effective Frequency: One Exposure or Three Factors? , 2006 .

[7]  J. Campbell,et al.  Event Studies in Economics and Finance , 1997 .

[8]  W. D. Bondt A portrait of the individual investor , 1998 .

[9]  Paul E. Johnson,et al.  Detecting deception: adversarial problem solving in a low base-rate world , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[10]  Werner Antweiler,et al.  Is All that Talk Just Noise? The Information Content of Internet Stock Message Boards , 2001 .

[11]  R. Chandy,et al.  What to Say When: Advertising Appeals in Evolving Markets , 2001 .

[12]  Murray Z. Frank,et al.  Internet Stock Message Boards and Stock Returns , 2002 .

[13]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Consumer and Business Deception on the Internet: Content Analysis of Documentary Evidence , 2003, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[14]  Measuring the Hidden Power of Emotive Advertising , 2005 .

[15]  Tamara Dinev,et al.  Why spoofing is serious internet fraud , 2006, CACM.

[16]  A. Shleifer,et al.  Coarse Thinking and Persuasion , 2006 .

[17]  Rainer Böhme,et al.  The Effect of Stock Spam on Financial Markets , 2006, WEIS.

[18]  J. Zittrain,et al.  Spam Works: Evidence from Stock Touts and Corresponding Market Activity , 2007 .

[19]  Philip J. Stone,et al.  The general inquirer: A computer system for content analysis and retrieval based on the sentence as a unit of information , 2007 .

[20]  R. O’Brien,et al.  A Caution Regarding Rules of Thumb for Variance Inflation Factors , 2007 .

[21]  Chenchuramaiah T. Bathala Giving Content to Investor Sentiment: The Role of Media in the Stock Market , 2007 .

[22]  M. Hanke,et al.  On the effects of stock spam e-mails , 2008 .

[23]  Sofus A. Macskassy,et al.  More than Words: Quantifying Language to Measure Firms' Fundamentals the Authors Are Grateful for Assiduous Research Assistance from Jie Cao and Shuming Liu. We Appreciate Helpful Comments From , 2007 .

[24]  Jean-Yves Delort,et al.  The Impact of Manipulation in Internet Stock Message Boards , 2009 .

[25]  Thomas H. Mcinish,et al.  The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 and Stock Spam Emails , 2009 .

[26]  Tim Loughran,et al.  Measuring Readability in Financial Text , 2010 .

[27]  Tim Loughran,et al.  When is a Liability not a Liability? Textual Analysis, Dictionaries, and 10-Ks , 2010 .

[28]  Steven Skiena,et al.  Trading Strategies to Exploit Blog and News Sentiment , 2010, ICWSM.

[29]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Detecting Fake Websites: The Contribution of Statistical Learning Theory , 2010, MIS Q..

[30]  S. Bellman,et al.  Minimum effective frequency for interactive television ads , 2010 .

[31]  ChenHsinchun,et al.  Detecting fake websites , 2010 .

[32]  Garrett P. Sonnier,et al.  A Dynamic Model of the Effect of Online Communications on Firm Sales , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[33]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Product-Related Deception in E-Commerce: A Theoretical Perspective , 2011, MIS Q..

[34]  Johan Bollen,et al.  Twitter Mood as a Stock Market Predictor , 2011, Computer.

[35]  Ki Joon Kim,et al.  The more the better? Effects of ad exposure frequency on online consumers with varying product knowledge , 2012, 2012 8th International Conference on Information Science and Digital Content Technology (ICIDT2012).