Cultural transmission in pigeons is affected by the number of tutors and bystanders present

Abstract Abstract. The basic assumption of the logistic contagion model of cultural transmission is that the rate of adoption of innovations increases with the number of knowledgeable tutors and the number of uninformed observers. To test this assumption, pigeons, Columba livia , were presented with the problem of pecking open a stoppered, inverted test-tube to obtain seeds. In experiment 1, tutor number was increased by presenting caged observers with either one, three, six or nine tutor(s). In experiment 2, the number of uninformed bystanders was increased by adding two, five, eight or no bystanders (pigeons that could not provide demonstrations) to tutor-observer dyads. In experiment 1 the observers learned more quickly with increasing tutor number; both latency of first peck to the test-tube stopper and latency of test-tube opening decreased linearly with increasing tutor number. Increasing tutor number also decreased the latency of the first demonstration within multi-tutored demonstrations, but the latency of the average demonstration increased with tutor number. In experiment 2 observers learned more slowly with increasing number of bystanders; both the latency of first peck to test-tube and the latency of test-tube opening increased linearly with the number of bystanders. The number of bystanders also increased the latency of the tutors' demonstration. Taken together, the results suggest that the spread of innovations within a population will be exponential, rather than sigmoidal as predicted by the contagion model: as the skill spreads, the rate of learning increases as a result of the dual effects of increased tutor number and reduced bystander number.

[1]  B. Galef,et al.  Social Influences on the Selection of a Protein-Sufficient Diet by Norway Rats (Rattus norvegicus) , 1989 .

[2]  A. Kacelnik,et al.  Effects of the knowledge of partners on learning rates in zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  E. Visalberghi,et al.  Social processes affecting the appearance of innovative behaviors in capuchin monkeys. , 1990, Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology.

[4]  F. Strayer Learning and imitation as a function of social status in macaque monkeys (Macaca nemestrina) , 1976, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Scrounging prevents cultural transmission of food-finding behaviour in pigeons , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Group Foraging: The Skill Pool Effect and Frequency-Dependent Learning , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[7]  M. Feldman,et al.  Cultural transmission and evolution: a quantitative approach. , 1981, Monographs in population biology.

[8]  Y. Sugita IMITATIVE CHOICE BEHAVIOR IN GUPPIES , 1980 .

[9]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Exchangeable producer and scrounger roles in a captive flock of feral pigeons: a case for the skill pool effect , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  R. Hinde,et al.  The Opening of Milk Bottles by Birds , 1952, Nature.

[11]  Thomas Caraco,et al.  Social foraging: individual learning and cultural transmission of innovations , 1994 .

[12]  P. Richerson,et al.  Culture and the Evolutionary Process , 1988 .

[13]  R. C. Bryant,et al.  Group training in goldfish (Carasius auratus): Effects on acquisition and retention. , 1975 .