Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: some food for thought

Cognitive load is a theoretical notion with an increasingly central role in the educational research literature. The basic idea of cognitive load theory is that cognitive capacity in working memory is limited, so that if a learning task requires too much capacity, learning will be hampered. The recommended remedy is to design instructional systems that optimize the use of working memory capacity and avoid cognitive overload. Cognitive load theory has advanced educational research considerably and has been used to explain a large set of experimental findings. This article sets out to explore the open questions and the boundaries of cognitive load theory by identifying a number of prob lematic conceptual, methodological and application-related issues. It concludes by pre senting a research agenda for future studies of cognitive load.

[1]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[2]  Leslie J. Briggs,et al.  Principles of Instructional Design , 1974 .

[3]  James O. Carey,et al.  The systematic design of instruction , 1978 .

[4]  D. Klahr,et al.  Formal assessment of problem-solving and planning processes in preschool children , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  N. Moray.  Subjective Mental Workload , 1982 .

[6]  Charles M. Reigeluth,et al.  Instructional Design Theories and Models : An Overview of Their Current Status , 1983 .

[7]  D. Campbell.  Task Complexity: A Review and Analysis , 1988 .

[8]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[9]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive technology: Some procedures for facilitating learning and problem solving in mathematics and science. , 1989 .

[10]  R. Engle,et al.  Is working memory capacity task dependent , 1989 .

[11]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive load as a factor in the structuring of technical material. , 1990 .

[12]  P. Chandler,et al.  Evidence for Cognitive Load Theory , 1991 .

[13]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction , 1991 .

[14]  Fred G. W. C. Paas,et al.  The Efficiency of Instructional Conditions: An Approach to Combine Mental Effort and Performance Measures , 1992 .

[15]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Conceptual Change within and across Ontological Categories: Examples from Learning and Discovery in Science , 1992 .

[16]  P. Chandler,et al.  THE SPLIT‐ATTENTION EFFECT AS A FACTOR IN THE DESIGN OF INSTRUCTION , 1992 .

[17]  F. Paas.  Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. , 1992 .

[18]  John Sweller,et al.  Some cognitive processes and their consequences for the organisation and presentation of information , 1993 .

[19]  Paul Ayres.  Why Goal-Free Problems Can Facilitate Learning , 1993 .

[20]  J. Sweller.  COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY, LEARNING DIFFICULTY, AND INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN , 1994 .

[21]  F. Paas,et al.  Variability of Worked Examples and Transfer of Geometrical Problem-Solving Skills: A Cognitive-Load Approach , 1994 .

[22]  R. Mayer,et al.  For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. , 1994 .

[23]  M. Chi,et al.  Eliciting Self‐Explanations Improves Understanding , 1994 .

[24]  F. Paas,et al.  Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks , 1994 .

[25]  P. Chandler,et al.  Why Some Material Is Difficult to Learn , 1994 .

[26]  F. Paas,et al.  Measurement of Cognitive Load in Instructional Research , 1994, Perceptual and motor skills.

[27]  David C. Webb,et al.  Learning by Understanding: The Role of Multiple Representations in Learning Algebra , 1995 .

[28]  J. Sweller,et al.  Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes , 1995 .

[29]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load While Learning to Use a Computer Program , 1996 .

[30]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  The development of hierarchical representation of two-dimensional space. , 1996, Child development.

[31]  Paul Chandler,et al.  Some Conditions under Which Integrated Computer-Based Training Software Can Facilitate Learning , 1996 .

[32]  P. F. Jong,et al.  Working memory, intelligence and reading ability in children , 1996 .

[33]  W. Verwey,et al.  Detecting short periods of elevated workload: A comparison of nine workload assessment techniques , 1996 .

[34]  Kenneth Kotovsky,et al.  Implicit learning in problem solving : The role of working memory capacity , 1997 .

[35]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Working Memory: A View from Neuroimaging , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  Sharon K Tindall-Ford,et al.  When two sensory modes are better than one , 1997 .

[37]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive load theory and instructional design , 1997 .

[38]  R. Perlow,et al.  Role of Verbal Working Memory in Complex Skill Acquisition , 1997 .

[39]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? , 1997 .

[40]  Yeung,et al.  Cognitive Load and Learner Expertise: Split-Attention and Redundancy Effects in Reading with Explanatory Notes , 1998, Contemporary educational psychology.

[41]  R. Mayer,et al.  A Split-Attention Effect in Multimedia Learning: Evidence for Dual Processing Systems in Working Memory , 1998 .

[42]  Paul Chandler,et al.  Levels of Expertise and Instructional Design , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[43]  H. Mandl,et al.  Learning from Worked-Out Examples: The Effects of Example Variability and Elicited Self-Explanations , 1998, Contemporary educational psychology.

[44]  Fred Paas,et al.  High versus low contextual interference in simulation-based training of troubleshooting skills: effects on transfer performance and invested mental effort , 1998 .

[45]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[46]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction , 1999 .

[47]  Richard K. Lowe.  Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning , 1999 .

[48]  R. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive Principles of Multimedia Learning: The Role of Modality and Contiguity , 1999 .

[49]  Ton de Jong,et al.  The Integration of Computer Simulation and Learning Support: An Example from the Physics Domain of Collisions , 1999 .

[50]  J. Tuovinen,et al.  A comparison of cognitive load associated with discovery learning and worked examples , 1999 .

[51]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia-Supported Metaphors for Meaning Making in Mathematics , 1999 .

[52]  I. Gere,et al.  Multimedia: Differences in cognitive processes observed with EEG , 1999 .

[53]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Prediction of Mental Workload in Single and Multiple Tasks Environments , 2000 .

[54]  S. Derry,et al.  Learning from Examples: Instructional Principles from the Worked Examples Research , 2000 .

[55]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Incorporating Learner Experience into the Design of Multimedia Instruction. , 2000 .

[56]  A. Miyake,et al.  Individual differences in working memory: introduction to the special section. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[57]  Paul Ayres.  Systematic Mathematical Errors and Cognitive Load. , 2001, Contemporary educational psychology.

[58]  Fred Paas,et al.  Dynamic problem selection in air traffic control training: a comparison between performance, mental effort and mental efficiency , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[59]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Learner Experience and Efficiency of Instructional Guidance , 2001 .

[60]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[61]  R. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. , 2001 .

[62]  N. Cowan.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[63]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  When problem solving is superior to studying worked examples. , 2001 .

[64]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Learner vs. System Control in Using Online Support for Simulation-based Discovery Learning , 2001 .

[65]  H. Swanson,et al.  Are Mathematics Disabilities Due to a Domain-General or a Domain-Specific Working Memory Deficit? , 2001, Journal of learning disabilities.

[66]  R. Mayer,et al.  When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? , 2001 .

[67]  Sharon K Tindall-Ford,et al.  Learning by imagining. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[68]  Y. Lou,et al.  Small Group and Individual Learning with Technology: A Meta-Analysis , 2001 .

[69]  D. Leutner,et al.  Assessment of cognitive load in multimedia learning using dual-task methodology. , 2002, Experimental psychology.

[70]  Scotty D. Craig,et al.  Animated Pedagogical Agents in Multimedia Educational Environments: Effects of Agent Properties, Picture Features, and Redundancy , 2002 .

[71]  R. Mayer,et al.  Aids to computer-based multimedia learning , 2002 .

[72]  Maria Bannert,et al.  Managing Cognitive Load--Recent Trends in Cognitive Load Theory. Commentary. , 2002 .

[73]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Cognitive load theory: implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning , 2002 .

[74]  R. Mayer.  Rote Versus Meaningful Learning , 2002 .

[75]  H. Mandl,et al.  Conditions and effects of example elaboration , 2002 .

[76]  J. G. Schuurman,et al.  Redirecting learners' attention during training: Effects on cognitive load, transfer test performance and training efficiency. , 2002 .

[77]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive load theory and aging: effects of worked examples on training efficiency , 2002 .

[78]  Patricia D. Mautone,et al.  Pictorial aids for learning by doing in a multimedia geology simulation game. , 2002 .

[79]  P. Chandler,et al.  Assimilating complex information , 2002 .

[80]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  Goal Configurations and Processing Strategies as Moderators Between Instructional Design and Cognitive Load: Evidence From Hypertext-Based Instruction , 2003 .

[81]  R. Atkinson,et al.  Structuring the Transition From Example Study to Problem Solving in Cognitive Skill Acquisition: A Cognitive Load Perspective , 2003 .

[82]  Detlev Leutner,et al.  Cognitive load in reading a foreign language text with multimedia aids and the influence of verbal and spatial abilities , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[83]  Peter Nickel,et al.  Sensitivity and Diagnosticity of the 0.1-Hz Component of Heart Rate Variability as an Indicator of Mental Workload , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[84]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  The Expertise Reversal Effect , 2003 .

[85]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory , 2003 .

[86]  D. Leutner,et al.  Direct Measurement of Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[87]  Hans Gruber,et al.  Cognitive Load beim Lernen aus Lösungsbeispielen , 2003 .

[88]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia learning in an interactive self-explaining environment: What works in the design of agent , 2003 .

[89]  R. Mayer,et al.  Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[90]  P. Kirschner,et al.  Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning , 2003 .

[91]  Richard Catrambone,et al.  Designing Instructional Examples to Reduce Intrinsic Cognitive Load: Molar versus Modular Presentation of Solution Procedures , 2004 .

[92]  R. Mayer.  Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[93]  D. Leutner,et al.  Assessment of Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning with Dual-Task Methodology: Auditory Load and Modality Effects , 2004 .

[94]  Anna M. Rose,et al.  Affective responses to financial data and multimedia: the effects of information load and cognitive load , 2004, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[95]  Fred Paas,et al.  Mental Effort and Performance as Determinants for the Dynamic Selection of Learning Tasks in Air Traffic Control Training , 2004 .

[96]  L. Siegel,et al.  Working memory and access to numerical information in children with disability in mathematics. , 2004, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[97]  R. Moreno.  Decreasing Cognitive Load for Novice Students: Effects of Explanatory versus Corrective Feedback in Discovery-Based Multimedia , 2004 .

[98]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory: Instructional Implications of the Interaction between Information Structures and Cognitive Architecture , 2004 .

[99]  F. Paas,et al.  Memory load and the cognitive pupillary response in aging. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[100]  H. Tabbers,et al.  Multimedia instructions and cognitive load theory: effects of modality and cueing. , 2004, The British journal of educational psychology.

[101]  Fred Paas,et al.  Exploring Multidimensional Approaches to the Efficiency of Instructional Conditions , 2004 .

[102]  Sang D. Choi,et al.  An investigation of myocardial aerobic capacity as a measure of both physical and cognitive workloads , 2005 .

[103]  John Sweller,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: The Split-Attention Principle in Multimedia Learning , 2005 .

[104]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Commonsense Conceptions of Emergent Processes: Why Some Misconceptions Are Robust , 2005 .

[105]  R. Moreno,et al.  Cognitive load and learning effects of having students organize pictures and words in multimedia environments: The role of student interactivity and feedback , 2005 .

[106]  John Sweller,et al.  The Redundancy Principle in Multimedia Learning , 2005, The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning.

[107]  Atsuo Murata,et al.  An Attempt to Evaluate Mental Workload Using Wavelet Transform of EEG , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[108]  Bhiksha Raj,et al.  A Comparison Between Spoken Queries and Menu-Based Interfaces for In-car Digital Music Selection , 2005, INTERACT.

[109]  J. Sweller,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: The Modality Principle in Multimedia Learning , 2005 .

[110]  Wolfgang Schnotz,et al.  Enabling, facilitating, and inhibiting effects of animations in multimedia learning: Why reduction of cognitive load can have negative results on learning , 2005 .

[111]  John Sweller,et al.  The impact of sequencing and prior knowledge on learning mathematics through spreadsheet applications , 2005 .

[112]  Paul Ginns.  Meta-Analysis of the Modality Effect. , 2005 .

[113]  Martin Valcke,et al.  Multimedia learning in social sciences: limitations of external graphical representations , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[114]  Fred Paas,et al.  Design of interactive and dynamic anatomical visualizations: the implication of cognitive load theory. , 2005, Anatomical record. Part B, New anatomist.

[115]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions , 2005 .

[116]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  When static media promote active learning: annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia instruction. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[117]  Andrew T. Stull,et al.  Three Experimental Comparisons of Learner-generated versus Author-provided Graphic Organizers , 2007 .

[118]  Jennifer L. Chiu,et al.  Teaching and Assessing Knowledge Integration in Science , 2006, Science.

[119]  Daniel Bodemer,et al.  External and mental referencing of multiple representations , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[120]  M. Rinck,et al.  Multimedia learning: Working memory and the learning of word and picture diagrams , 2006 .

[121]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Technological Advances in Inquiry Learning , 2006 .

[122]  Stephan Schwan,et al.  Effects of presentation speed of a dynamic visualization on the understanding of a mechanical system , 2008 .

[123]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Just-in-time information presentation: Improving learning a troubleshooting skill. , 2006 .

[124]  Remy M. J. P. Rikers.  A critical reflection on emerging topics in cognitive load research , 2006 .

[125]  Thomas Huk,et al.  Who benefits from learning with 3D models? the case of spatial ability , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[126]  R. Catrambone,et al.  Can learning from molar and modular worked examples be enhanced by providing instructional explanations and prompting self-explanations? * , 2006 .

[127]  James D. Slotta,et al.  Helping Students Understand Challenging Topics in Science Through Ontology Training , 2006 .

[128]  Paul Ayres.  Impact of Reducing Intrinsic Cognitive Load on Learning in a Mathematical Domain. , 2006 .

[129]  Jeffrey T. Steedle,et al.  Working memory, fluid intelligence, and science learning , 2006 .

[130]  Tina Seufert,et al.  Cognitive load and the format of instructional aids for coherence formation , 2006 .

[131]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching , 2006 .

[132]  Fred Paas,et al.  Timing of cueing in complex problem-solving tasks: Learner versus system control , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[133]  R. Moreno,et al.  Does the modality principle hold for different media? A test of the method-affects-learning hypothesis , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[134]  F. Paas,et al.  Teaching complex rather than simple tasks: balancing intrinsic and germane load to enhance transfer of learning , 2006 .

[135]  S. Ainsworth.  DeFT: A Conceptual Framework for Considering Learning with Multiple Representations. , 2006 .

[136]  Robert K. Atkinson,et al.  Animated pedagogical agents: does their degree of embodiment impact learning from static or animated worked examples? , 2007 .

[137]  W. Schnotz,et al.  A Reconsideration of Cognitive Load Theory , 2007 .

[138]  Robert K. Atkinson,et al.  Fostering multimedia learning of science: Exploring the role of an animated agent's image , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[139]  Slava Kalyuga.  Expertise Reversal Effect and Its Implications for Learner-Tailored Instruction , 2007 .

[140]  Tomi Laitinen,et al.  Heart rate and performance during combat missions in a flight simulator. , 2007, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[141]  Béatrice S. Hasler,et al.  Learner Control, Cognitive Load and Instructional Animation , 2007 .

[142]  Fred Paas,et al.  Instructional efficiency of animation: effects of interactivity through mental reconstruction of static key frames , 2007 .

[143]  R. Mayer,et al.  Interactive Multimodal Learning Environments , 2007 .

[144]  John Sweller,et al.  Redundancy in foreign language reading comprehension instruction: Concurrent written and spoken presentations , 2007 .

[145]  Susanne M. Jaeggi,et al.  On how high performers keep cool brains in situations of cognitive overload , 2007, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[146]  Roland Brünken,et al.  The impact of intrinsic cognitive load on the effectiveness of graphical help for coherence formation , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[147]  Geraldine Clarebout,et al.  In Search of Pedagogical Agents' Modality and Dialogue Effects in Open Learning Environments , 2007 .

[148]  Brianna Scott,et al.  Navigational spatial displays: The role of metacognition as cognitive load * , 2007 .

[149]  R. Mayer,et al.  Does the modality principle for multimedia learning apply to science classrooms , 2007 .

[150]  R. Moreno.  Optimising learning from animations by minimising cognitive load: cognitive and affective consequences of signalling and segmentation methods , 2007 .

[151]  J. Merriënboer,et al.  Selecting learning tasks: Effects of adaptation and shared control on learning efficiency and task involvement☆ , 2008 .

[152]  P. Kirschner,et al.  Cognitive load measurements and stimulated recall interviews for studying the effects of information and communications technology , 2008 .

[153]  Krista E. DeLeeuw,et al.  A Comparison of Three Measures of Cognitive Load: Evidence for Separable Measures of Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Load , 2008 .

[154]  Fred Paas,et al.  Effects of studying sequences of process-oriented and product-oriented worked examples on troubleshooting transfer efficiency , 2008 .

[155]  Brian C. Nelson,et al.  Managing cognitive load in educational multi-user virtual environments: reflection on design practice , 2008 .

[156]  Cheryl I. Johnson,et al.  Revising the Redundancy Principle in Multimedia Learning. , 2008 .

[157]  Graham Cooper,et al.  Research into Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design at UNSW , 2008 .

[158]  Jan Elen,et al.  The effects of multimedia design features on primary school learning materials , 2008 .

[159]  Zeynel Kablan,et al.  Instructional efficiency of integrated and separated text with animated presentations in computer-based science instruction , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[160]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  The consequences of fading instructional guidance on delayed performance: the case of financial services training , 2008 .

[161]  Jose L. Pardo-Vazquez,et al.  External validation of the computerized, group administrable adaptation of the “operation span task” , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[162]  F. Paas,et al.  Instructional Efficiency: Revisiting the Original Construct in Educational Research , 2008 .

[163]  Gary R. Morrison,et al.  Controlling split attention and redundancy in physical therapy instruction , 2008 .

[164]  Faaizah Shahbodin,et al.  Chemistry problem solving instruction: a comparison of three computer-based formats for learning from hierarchical network problem representations , 2009 .

[165]  Tamara van Gog,et al.  State of the art research into Cognitive Load Theory , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[166]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Effects of fading support on hypertext navigation and performance in student-centered e-learning environments , 2009, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[167]  Ernest C. D. M. van Lieshout,et al.  The effect of illustrations in arithmetic problem-solving: Effects of increased cognitive load , 2009 .

[168]  Peter E. Doolittle,et al.  Multimedia learning and individual differences: Mediating the effects of working memory capacity with segmentation , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[169]  Mari Carmen Puerta Melguizo,et al.  The effects of the number of links and navigation support on cognitive load and learning with hypertext: The mediating role of reading order , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[170]  K. Scheiter,et al.  The Scientific Value of Cognitive Load Theory: A Research Agenda Based on the Structuralist View of Theories , 2009 .

[171]  T. S. Hilbert,et al.  Example-Based Learning in Heuristic Domains: A Cognitive Load Theory Account , 2009 .

[172]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  Explaining the split-attention effect: Is the reduction of extraneous cognitive load accompanied by an increase in germane cognitive load? , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[173]  Roland Brünken,et al.  Memory characteristics and modality in multimedia learning: An aptitude–treatment–interaction study , 2009 .

[174]  Detlev Leutner,et al.  The impact of goal specificity and goal type on learning outcome and cognitive load , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[175]  John Sweller,et al.  The worked-example effect using ill-defined problems: Learning to recognise designers' styles , 2009 .

[176]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  Learning with hypermedia: The influence of representational formats and different levels of learner control on performance and learning behavior , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[177]  Fred Paas,et al.  Observational learning from animated models: Effects of modality and reflection on transfer , 2009 .

[178]  Fred Paas,et al.  Uncovering cognitive processes: Different techniques that can contribute to cognitive load research and instruction , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[179]  Robert Z. Zheng,et al.  Effects of multimedia on cognitive load, self-efficacy, and multiple rule-based problem solving , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[180]  André Tricot,et al.  Prior knowledge in learning from a non-linear electronic document: Disorientation and coherence of the reading sequences , 2009, Computers in Human Behavior.

[181]  F. Paas,et al.  Attention guidance in learning from a complex animation: Seeing is understanding? , 2010 .