An analysis of tube drawing process used to produce squared sections from round tubes through FE simulation and response surface methodology

Tube drawing process is an attractive manufacturing technique in automobile, medical, and aerospace industries. The quality of fabricated tubes is highly affected by drawing parameters, e.g., die geometry, material properties, friction conditions, and drawing ratio. In the present study, an extensive attempt has been made to find optimal combinations of drawing parameters, i.e., die angle, friction coefficient, tube entrance velocity, and deformation length regarding minimum drawing force and dimensional error as well as maximum linear and peripheral thickness distributions. A combination of finite element model, validated through trial experiments, and face-centered central composite design was used to design a matrix. Then, response surface methodology (RSM) was used to correlate empirical relationships between process factors and responses. The developed RSM models were then used to find the effects of tube drawing parameters on the mentioned performances. RSM was used further for the selection of optimum process parameters to achieve the desired quality regarding tube drawing performance in producing squared sections from round tubes. The results showed that to attain desired quality characteristics, the die angle of 7.5°, deformation length of 3 mm, friction coefficient of 0.3, and entrance velocity of 5 mm/min should be selected. A comparison between the optimal results and those derived from finite element (FE) model showed that the proposed approach would be able to predict optimal drawing process combinations with a high degree of accuracy.

[1]  Mario Fafard,et al.  Optimization on the cold drawing process of 6063 aluminium tubes , 2011 .

[2]  Reza Teimouri,et al.  Experimental investigation and statistical optimization of laser surface cladding parameters , 2015 .

[3]  Sunil Pandey,et al.  Modelling of the effects of welding conditions on dilution of stainless steel claddings produced by gas metal arc welding procedures , 2008 .

[4]  Mansour Aminian,et al.  Application of soft computing techniques for modeling and analysis of MRR and taper in laser machining process as well as weld strength and weld width in laser welding process , 2015, Soft Comput..

[5]  George E. P. Box,et al.  Empirical Model‐Building and Response Surfaces , 1988 .

[6]  Reza Teimouri,et al.  Parametric study along with selection of optimal solutions in dry wire cut machining of cemented tungsten carbide (WC-Co) , 2013 .

[7]  Ghassan T. Kridli,et al.  Investigation of thickness variation and corner filling in tube hydroforming , 2003 .

[8]  Laila S. Bayoumi,et al.  Determination of the forming tool load in plastic shaping of a round tube into a square tubular section , 2009 .

[9]  Kazunari Yoshida,et al.  Mandrel drawing and plug drawing of shape-memory-alloy fine tubes used in catheters and stents , 2004 .

[10]  Ken-ichi Manabe,et al.  Effects of process parameters and material properties on deformation process in tube hydroforming , 2002 .

[11]  G. R. Bai,et al.  Study of the deformation velocity field and drawing force during the dieless drawing of tube , 1999 .

[12]  Saeed Parsa Khanghah,et al.  Optimization of Micro-milling Parameters Regarding Burr Size Minimization via RSM and Simulated Annealing Algorithm , 2015, Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals.

[13]  Yeong-Maw Hwang,et al.  Analysis of tube hydroforming in a square cross-sectional die , 2005 .

[14]  Yang Yuying,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of sheet metal forming process using Pareto-based genetic algorithm , 2008 .

[15]  D. Farrugia,et al.  Study of cold tube drawing by finite-element modelling , 1998 .

[16]  Reza Teimouri,et al.  Determining influence of ultrasonic-assisted friction stir welding parameters on mechanical and tribological properties of AA6061 joints , 2015 .

[17]  Laila S. Bayoumi,et al.  Cold drawing of regular polygonal tubular sections from round tubes , 2001 .

[18]  R. Bahloul,et al.  A study on optimal design of process parameters in single point incremental forming of sheet metal by combining Box–Behnken design of experiments, response surface methods and genetic algorithms , 2014 .

[19]  R. H. Myers,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[20]  André I. Khuri,et al.  Response surface methodology , 2010 .

[21]  Hamed Sohrabpoor,et al.  Experimental studies on ultrasonically assisted friction stir spot welding of AA6061 , 2015 .

[22]  Mario Fafard,et al.  A new method for production of variable thickness aluminium tubes: Numerical and experimental studies , 2011 .

[23]  Reza Teimouri,et al.  Statistical analysis and multiobjective optimization of process parameters in plasma spraying of partially stabilized zirconia , 2014 .

[24]  Taylan Altan,et al.  Finite element analysis of tube hydroforming processes in a rectangular die , 2003 .

[25]  Daw-Kwei Leu,et al.  Finite element simulation of the squaring circular tube , 2005 .

[26]  Reza Teimouri,et al.  Investigation of lubricant condition and machining parameters while turning of AISI 4340 , 2015 .

[27]  Derek J. Pike,et al.  Empirical Model‐building and Response Surfaces. , 1988 .