Driver distraction in long-haul truck drivers

Research on driver distraction has typically been conducted by means of epidemiology or experimental testing. The study presented here uses a naturalistic approach, where real-world driving data were collected from truck drivers as they worked their normal delivery runs. Crash, near-crash, and crash-relevant conflict data from 41 long-haul truck drivers, driving approximately 140,000 miles, were examined. Of the 2737 crashes, near-crashes, and crash-relevant conflicts (collectively termed “critical incidents”) that were recorded, 178 were attributed to “driver distraction”. The 178 distraction-related critical incidents were analyzed and 34 unique distraction types were identified. Results showed that a small number of long-haul drivers were involved in a disproportionate number of distraction-related critical incidents. For example, two of the drivers accounted for 43 of the 178 distraction incidents. Important insight was also gained into the relative safety impacts of different distracting agents and behaviors. The frequency and duration of a task, along with the visual demand associated with performing the task, were found to contribute in combination to the prevalence of critical incidents. Finally, it was found that simply because a task does not necessarily require visual attention does not mean that long-haul drivers will not look (sometimes often) away from the roadway. However, it is also clear that visually demanding tasks carry the highest degree of risk, relative to other categories of tasks.

[1]  Peter A. Hancock,et al.  The distraction effects of phone use during a crucial driving maneuver. , 2003 .

[2]  Michael J. Goodman,et al.  DRIVER DISTRACTION WITH WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND ROUTE GUIDANCE SYSTEMS , 2000 .

[3]  Eric Rodgman,et al.  The role of driver distraction in traffic crashes , 2001 .

[4]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  J M Violanti,et al.  Cellular phones and traffic accidents: an epidemiological approach. , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  The 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Phase II – Results of the 100-Car Field Experiment , 2006 .

[7]  J C Stutts,et al.  The role of driver distraction in crashes: an analysis of 1995-1999 Crashworthiness Data System Data. , 2001, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.

[8]  Richard J. Hanowski,et al.  Methodological overview of the drowsy driver warning system field operational test , 2004 .

[9]  Michael Mercadante,et al.  The causes and consequences of distraction in everyday driving. , 2003, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.

[10]  I. Brown,et al.  Vision in Vehicles III , 1991 .

[11]  Myra Blanco,et al.  The impact of secondary task cognitive processing demand on driving performance. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Paul Green,et al.  FURTHER ON-THE-ROAD TESTS OF DRIVER INTERFACES : EXAMINATION OF A ROUTE GUIDANCE SYSTEM AND A CAR PHONE , 1993 .