Traffic Modeling of Transit Oriented Development: Evaluation of Transit Friendly Strategies and Innovative Intersection Designs in West Valley City, UT

Street networks designed to support Transit Oriented Development (TOD) increase accessibility for non-motorized traffic. However, the implications of TOD supportive networks for still dominant vehicular traffic are rarely addressed. Due to this lack of research, decision making in favor of TOD supportive street networks is often a difficult process. The goal of this project is to quantify the traffic impacts of TOD using a study network in West Valley City, Utah. In the methodology, the test network is modified using not only designs typical for TODs, but also some network designs that enhance traffic operations. Proposed network designs represent the alternatives to traditional street widening approaches that should increase traffic efficiency while not discouraging non-motorized modes. This approach would increase the potential of the test network to become a TOD in the future, with two Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) lines already in place. The results indicate that network designs that could be beneficial for TOD, such as enhanced street connectivity, innovative intersection designs, traffic calming measures and Transit Friendly Designs (TFD), do not necessarily decrease the efficiency of vehicular traffic for the most critical travel demand conditions. The major contributions of this study are the indications that TOD-supportive network designs are not necessarily associated with negative effects for vehicular traffic, even in conditions where mode shift does not occur and auto-mode travel demand remains the same. This is a significant finding that could be useful for metropolitan regions looking to retrofit the suburban neighborhoods into multimodal developments.

[1]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Impacts of traffic calming , 2000 .

[2]  Yujia Wu,et al.  COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS FOR MEASURING SPACE-TIME ACCESSIBILITY WITHIN DYNAMIC FLOW TRANSPORTATION NETWORKS , 2001 .

[3]  Richard L. Church,et al.  Mapping transit‐based access: integrating GIS, routes and schedules , 2010, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[4]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Traffic Calming: State of the Practice , 1999 .

[5]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Integration of an Activity-based Model System and a Residential Location Model , 1998 .

[6]  F C Dock,et al.  STREET SYSTEMS AND CLASSIFICATIONS TO SUPPORT SMART GROWTH , 2003 .

[7]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Measuring the Unmeasurable: Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability , 2009 .

[8]  Susan L Handy,et al.  EVALUATING NEIGHBORHOOD ACCESSIBILITY: ISSUES AND METHODS USING GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS , 2000 .

[9]  Susan L Handy,et al.  METHODOLOGIES FOR EXPLORING THE LINK BETWEEN URBAN FORM AND TRAVEL BEHAVIOR , 1996 .

[10]  Debbie A. Niemeier,et al.  Measuring Accessibility: An Exploration of Issues and Alternatives , 1997 .

[11]  David W. Crouse Traffic Calming: A Social Issue , 2004 .

[12]  S. Handy,et al.  Planning For Street Connectivity: Getting from Here to There , 2003 .

[13]  Edward Beimborn,et al.  ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF LOCAL STREET CONNECTIVITY ON ARTERIAL TRAFFIC , 2004 .

[14]  Mike Tresidder,et al.  Using GIS to Measure Connectivity : An Exploration of Issues , 2005 .

[15]  Dick Nelson,et al.  A New Planning Template for Transit-Oriented Development , 2001 .

[16]  C. Berkowitz,et al.  Continuous flow intersection: A public private partnership , 1996, Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference, 1996.

[17]  L King,et al.  THE NEW AASHTO METRIC POLICY ON GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF HIGHWAYS AND STREETS , 1995 .

[18]  Harvey J. Miller,et al.  Measuring Space‐Time Accessibility Benefits within Transportation Networks: Basic Theory and Computational Procedures , 1999 .

[19]  Todd Litman,et al.  MEASURING TRANSPORTATION: TRAFFIC, MOBILITY, AND ACCESSIBILITY , 2003 .

[20]  Kittelson,et al.  A Guidebook for Developing a Transit Performance-Measurement System , 2003 .

[21]  R Elvik,et al.  Area-wide urban traffic calming schemes: a meta-analysis of safety effects. , 2001, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  K. S. Weerasekera,et al.  NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF MID-BLOCK SPEED CONTROL DEVICES AND THEIR IMPORTANCE IN THE OVERALL IMPACT OF TRAFFIC CALMING ON THE ENVIRONMENT , 1998 .

[23]  Joseph L. Schofer,et al.  Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations , 2012 .

[24]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Traffic Generated by Mixed-Use Developments—13-Region Study Using Consistent Built Environment Measures , 2011 .

[25]  Jennifer Dill Measuring Network Connectivity for Bicycling and Walking , 2004 .

[26]  M. McNally,et al.  A COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF TRAVEL CHARACTERISTICS FOR NEO-TRADITIONAL DEVELOPMENTS , 1992 .

[27]  Eric Dumbaugh,et al.  Safe Urban Form: Revisiting the Relationship Between Community Design and Traffic Safety , 2009 .

[28]  Vhb,et al.  Innovative intersection safety improvement strategies and management practices : a domestic scan. , 2006 .

[29]  S. Handy Understanding the Link Between Urban Form and Nonwork Travel Behavior , 1995 .

[30]  Harvey J. Miller,et al.  Modelling accessibility using space-time prism concepts within geographical information systems , 1991, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[31]  Norman W. Garrick,et al.  Street network types and road safety: A study of 24 California cities , 2010 .

[32]  M. Kwan Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: a comparative analysis using a point-based framework , 2010 .

[33]  Joseph E. Hummer,et al.  Travel Time Comparisons Between Seven Unconventional Arterial Intersection Designs , 2001 .

[34]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Quasi-Experimental Study of Traffic Calming Measures in New York City , 2013 .

[35]  Reid Ewing,et al.  BEYOND DENSITY, MODE CHOICE, AND SINGLE-PURPOSE TRIPS , 1995 .

[36]  John Peponis,et al.  The Effects of Street Connectivity upon the Distribution of Local Vehicular Traffic in Metropolitan Atlanta , 2009 .

[37]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment , 2010 .

[38]  J N LaPlante,et al.  AASHTO GUIDE FOR THE PLANNING, DESIGN AND OPERATION OF PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES , 2000 .

[39]  Joseph E. Hummer,et al.  Analyzing System Travel Time in Arterial Corridors with Unconventional Designs Using Microscopic Simulation , 1999 .

[40]  R. Ewing Pedestrian- and Transit-Friendly Design: A Primer for Smart Growth , 1999 .

[41]  Richard H. Pratt,et al.  Transit-Oriented Development -- Traveler Response to Transportation System Changes , 2007 .

[42]  Randall Crane,et al.  Cars and Drivers in the New Suburbs: Linking Access to Travel in Neotraditional Planning , 1994 .

[43]  S Kamen,et al.  The task force. , 1976, Journal of hospital dental practice.

[44]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Regional Versus Local Accessibility: Implications for Nonwork Travel , 1993 .