Relationship between in vitro digestion of proteins and in vivo assessment of their nutritional quality.

The relationship between the nature of in vitro digestion products and protein quality evaluation in rats was established. Eleven protein sources of animal and vegetable origin and of various purities were digested by pepsin then by pancreatin in a dialysis bag of 1,000 molecular weight cutoff. Animal proteins were generally better digested in vitro than vegetable proteins. Amino acid release partly reflected enzyme specificity and varied depending on the nature of the protein. Essential amino acids were generally released rapidly at the expense of non-essential amino acids. The composition of protein hydrolysis products was thus markedly different from that of the protein before digestion. Digestibility determination in rats showed much less variation between proteins than the in vitro method; the two digestibility measurements did not correlate. However, by using stepwise multiple regression analysis, the amino acid composition of in vitro digestion products was found to correlate with the protein efficiency ratio (PER) more accurately than protein composition (R2 = 0.981 and 0.934, respectively). A regression analysis with net protein ratio (NPR) gave lower R2 coefficients than with PER (0.941 and 0.921, respectively). When regression equations were employed to predict the PER and digestion products were used instead of protein composition, an improvement was seen for almost all the test proteins, especially beef, rapeseed and wheat gluten. Better evaluation of protein quality by the use of protein digestion products demonstrates the possible impact of amino acid availability on protein quality.

[1]  K. T. Wang,et al.  Simplified protein hydrolysis with methanesulphonic acid at elevated temperature for the complete amino acid analysis of proteins. , 1988, Journal of chromatography.

[2]  C. Vachon,et al.  Enzymatic Conditions of an In Vitro Method to Study Protein Digestion , 1986 .

[3]  S. Gauthier,et al.  Dialysis Cell for the In Vitro Measurement of Protein Digestibility , 1986 .

[4]  G. Green,et al.  Role of dietary protein in rat pancreatic enzyme secretory response to a meal. , 1983, The Journal of nutrition.

[5]  M. Friedman,et al.  Inter‐ and Intra‐Laboratory Variation in Amino Acid Analysis of Food Proteins , 1983 .

[6]  C. Vachon,et al.  Enzymatic digestion method with dialysis to assess proteinodamage; Application to alkali-treated proteins containing lysinoalennane , 1982 .

[7]  C. Vachon,et al.  Assessment of protein digestibility by in vitro enzymatic hydrolysis with simultaneous dialysis. , 1982, The Journal of nutrition.

[8]  R. D. Phillips,et al.  In vitro assay for predicting protein efficiency ratio as measured by rat bioassay: collaborative study. , 1982, Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists.

[9]  Z. Bloomgarden,et al.  Amino acid disposition by liver and gastrointestinal tract after protein and glucose ingestion. , 1981, The American journal of physiology.

[10]  L. D. Satterlee,et al.  The DC-PER assay: a method for predicting protein quality solely from amino acid compositional data. , 1980 .

[11]  E. Evans,et al.  An assessment of methods used to determine protein quality. , 1978, World review of nutrition and dietetics.

[12]  Y. S. Kim,et al.  Protein digestion and absorption in the rat. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  W. Sauer,et al.  APPARENT AVAILABILITIES OF AMINO ACIDS IN CORN. WHEAT AND BARLEY FOR GROWING PIGS , 1977 .

[14]  Report of the American Institute of Nurtition ad hoc Committee on Standards for Nutritional Studies. , 1977, The Journal of nutrition.

[15]  R. Simpson,et al.  Complete amino acid analysis of proteins from a single hydrolysate. , 1976, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[16]  W. H. Liu,et al.  The inhibitory properties of avian ovoinhibitors aganist proteolytic enzymes. , 1971, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[17]  R. Buchanan In vivo and in vitro methods of measuring nutritive value of leaf-protein preparations , 1969, British Journal of Nutrition.

[18]  A. E. Stevenson,et al.  Measurement of feed intake by grazing cattle and sheep , 1963 .

[19]  J. Mauron,et al.  The availability of lysine, methionine and tryptophan in condensed milk and milk powder; in vitro digestion studies. , 1955, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[20]  D. B. Duncan MULTIPLE RANGE AND MULTIPLE F TESTS , 1955 .