Computer-Based "Mental Set" Tasks: An Alternative Approach to Studying Design Fixation

The term “design fixation” refers to a phenomenon where designers unknowingly limit the space within which they search for solutions. In an attempt to study this phenomenon experimentally, researchers typically set participants open-ended design problems, prime them with an example solution, and measure their performance through a variety of subjective metrics. This approach gives rise to various problems, including limited data capture and highly subjective evaluation of design behavior. To address these problems, we studied design fixation with a computer-based task inspired by psychological paradigms used to study “mental set” (also known as the “Einstellung effect”). The task consisted of a gamelike activity requiring participants to design a bridge within a specified budget. The use of a digital environment facilitated continuous data capture during the design activities. The constrained task (and direct quantitative measures) permitted a more objective analysis of design performance, including the occurrence of fixation. The results showed that participants who developed a mental set during the task failed to find alternative, more efficient solutions in trials admitting multiple solutions, compared to the participants who did not fall victim to this mental block. In addition, during the process of designing, the occurrence of mental set resulted in participants adopting a less efficient design behavior and reporting a different subjective experience of the task. The method used and the results obtained show an exciting alternative for studying design fixation experimentally and promote a wider exploration of the variety of design activities in which fixation might occur.

[1]  Fernand Gobet,et al.  The Mechanism of the Einstellung (Set) Effect , 2010 .

[2]  H. Simon,et al.  A simulation of memory for chess positions. , 1973 .

[3]  Luis A. Vasconcelos,et al.  Inspiration and fixation: Questions, methods, findings, and challenges , 2016 .

[4]  Gerd Fricke,et al.  Successful approaches in dealing with differently precise design problems , 1999 .

[5]  A. Luchins,et al.  New Experimental Attempts at Preventing Mechanization in Problem Solving , 1950 .

[6]  G. La Rocca,et al.  Knowledge-based engineering to support aircraft multidisciplinary design and optimization , 2010 .

[7]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  A Study of Design Fixation, Its Mitigation and Perception in Engineering Design Faculty , 2010 .

[8]  Peter McLeod,et al.  Why good thoughts block better ones. , 2014, Scientific American.

[9]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  Modeling the Role of Sketching in Design Idea Generation , 2014 .

[10]  David Radcliffe,et al.  Impact of CAD tools on creative problem solving in engineering design , 2009, Comput. Aided Des..

[11]  L. Mo,et al.  Schema induction in problem solving: a multidimensional analysis. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Expertise in Design: an overview , 2004 .

[13]  David Barlex,et al.  Sketching: Friend or Foe to the Novice Designer? , 2000 .

[14]  P. McLeod,et al.  Why good thoughts block better ones: The mechanism of the pernicious Einstellung (set) effect , 2008, Cognition.

[15]  A. Luchins Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of Einstellung. , 1942 .

[16]  Michael E Atwood,et al.  A process model for water jug problems , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  Alain Bernard,et al.  The evolution, challenges, and future of knowledge representation in product design systems , 2013, Comput. Aided Des..

[18]  J P Kassirer,et al.  Cognitive errors in diagnosis: instantiation, classification, and consequences. , 1989, The American journal of medicine.

[19]  K. Duncker,et al.  On problem-solving , 1945 .

[20]  Nathaniel Crilly,et al.  Fixation and creativity in concept development: the attitudes and practices of expert designers , 2015 .

[21]  David R. Michael,et al.  Serious Games: Games That Educate, Train, and Inform , 2005 .

[22]  Kathryn Henderson,et al.  On Line and On Paper: Visual Representations, Visual Culture, and Computer Graphics in Design Engineering , 1998 .

[23]  P. Croskerry The Importance of Cognitive Errors in Diagnosis and Strategies to Minimize Them , 2003, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[24]  Maryanne M. Gobble,et al.  Design Thinking , 2010, The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible.

[25]  Staffan Björk,et al.  Game Research Methods. An Overview , 2015 .

[26]  Marine Agogué,et al.  The impact of age and training on creativity: A design-theory approach to study fixation effects , 2014 .

[27]  Carey K. Morewedge,et al.  Debiasing Decisions , 2015 .

[28]  Raymonde Guindon Designing the design process: exploiting opportunistic thoughts , 1990 .

[29]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  A model of the mechanical design process based on empirical data , 1988, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[30]  Norman R. F. Maier,et al.  Reasoning and learning. , 1931 .

[31]  John R. Anderson,et al.  History of Success and Current Context in Problem Solving Combined Influences on Operator Selection , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[32]  E. Reingold,et al.  The Einstellung effect in anagram problem solving: evidence from eye movements , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[33]  Ian Dennis,et al.  Cognitive processes in engineering design: a longitudinal study , 1994 .

[34]  Stephen Culley,et al.  Beyond the concept: characterisations of later-stage creative behaviour in design , 2016, Research in Engineering Design.

[35]  Ekaterina P. Volkova,et al.  Emotion categorization of body expressions in narrative scenarios , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[36]  Peter Lloyd,et al.  Influences on Solution Search Processes in Design Organisations , 1999 .

[37]  N. Crilly The roles that artefacts play: technical, social and aesthetic functions , 2010 .

[38]  Marci S. DeCaro,et al.  From poor performance to success under stress: working memory, strategy selection, and mathematical problem solving under pressure. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[39]  M. E. Tresselt,et al.  The Einstellung Effect in Immediate and Delayed Problem-Solving , 1953 .

[40]  Robert J. Youmans,et al.  Design fixation: Classifications and modern methods of prevention , 2014, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[41]  A. Luchins,et al.  On recent usage of the Einstellung-effect as a test of rigidity. , 1951, Journal of consulting psychology.

[42]  A. Luchins,et al.  Rigidity of behavior : a variational approach to the effect of Einstellung , 1961 .

[43]  Robert J. Youmans,et al.  The effects of physical prototyping and group work on the reduction of design fixation , 2011 .

[44]  P. Saariluoma Error in chess: The apperception-restructuring view , 1992, Psychological research.

[45]  Matti Perttula,et al.  The idea exposure paradigm in design idea generation , 2007 .

[46]  Martin E. Knowles,et al.  Immediate and sustained effects of planning in a problem-solving task. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[47]  Valerie J. Caracelli,et al.  Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs , 1989 .

[48]  T. M. Amabile The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. , 1983 .

[49]  Paul A Howard-Jones,et al.  The Effect of Play on the Creativity of Young Children During Subsequent Activity , 2002 .

[50]  Stephen Culley,et al.  Analysing creative behaviour in the later stage design process , 2013 .

[51]  Michael Joseph French,et al.  Conceptual Design for Engineers , 1985 .

[52]  Jacob Bronowski The Creative Process , 1985 .

[53]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Fixation or inspiration? A meta-analytic review of the role of examples on design processes , 2015 .

[54]  Julie S. Linsey,et al.  Design Fixation in Physical Modeling: An Investigation on the Role of Sunk Cost , 2011 .

[55]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[56]  B Bender,et al.  ON THE SUPERIORITY OF OPPORTUNISTIC DESIGN STRATEGIES DURING EARLY EMBODIMENT DESIGN , 2004 .