Selective and Divided Attention: Extracting Information from Simultaneous Sound Sources

The way in which sounds interact and interfere with each other (both acoustically and perceptually) has an important influence on how well an auditory display can convey information. While spatial separation of simultaneous sound sources has been shown to be very effective when a listener must report the content of one source and ignore another source (a condition known as selective attention), little is known about how spatial separation influences performance in divided-attention tasks, i.e., tasks in which the listener must report the content of more than one simultaneous source. This paper reports preliminary results from a pilot study investigating how perceived spatial separation of sources and consistency in source locations influences performance on selectiveand divided-attention tasks. Results demonstrate that 1) in both selectiveand divided-attention tasks, overall performance is generally better when sources are perceived at different locations than when they are perceived at the same location; 2) in both selectiveand divided-attention tasks, randomly changing the perceived source locations from trial to trial tends to degrade performance compared to conditions where the source locations are fixed; and 3) both of the above effects are larger for selective-attention tasks than dividedattention tasks.

[1]  R L Freyman,et al.  The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Douglas S Brungart,et al.  The effects of spatial separation in distance on the informational and energetic masking of a nearby speech signal. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Richard L Freyman,et al.  Auditory target detection in reverberation. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  G. Kidd,et al.  The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  B. Shinn-Cunningham ACOUSTICS AND PERCEPTION OF SOUND IN EVERYDAY ENVIRONMENTS , 2003 .

[6]  Douglas S Brungart,et al.  Within-ear and across-ear interference in a cocktail-party listening task. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  J. Bird Effects of a difference in fundamental frequency in separating two sentences. , 1997 .

[8]  B Kollmeier,et al.  Directivity of binaural noise reduction in spatial multiple noise-source arrangements for normal and impaired listeners. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  R V Shannon,et al.  Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.

[10]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[11]  B G Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Spatial unmasking of nearby speech sources in a simulated anechoic environment. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  G. Kidd,et al.  Similarity, uncertainty, and masking in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  C. Darwin AUDITORY GROUPING AND ATTENTION TO SPEECH , 2001 .

[14]  R L Freyman,et al.  Spatial release from informational masking in speech recognition. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  W. T. Nelson,et al.  A speech corpus for multitalker communications research. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  G. Kidd,et al.  The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  D S Brungart,et al.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  C. Mason,et al.  Release from masking due to spatial separation of sources in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  B. Franklin Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance. , 1981 .

[20]  Barbara G. Shinn-Cunningham SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY, SPATIAL UNMASKING, AND REALISM IN REVERBERANT SPATIAL AUDITORY DISPLAYS , 2002 .

[21]  G. Kidd,et al.  Evidence for spatial tuning in informational masking using the probe-signal method. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Localizing nearby sound sources in a classroom: binaural room impulse responses. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Spatial hearing advantages in everyday environments , 2003 .

[24]  S. Sheft,et al.  A simulated “cocktail party” with up to three sound sources , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  A. Bronkhorst,et al.  Multichannel speech intelligibility and talker recognition using monaural, binaural, and three-dimensional auditory presentation. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Hideki Kawahara,et al.  Concurrent vowel identification. I. Effects of relative amplitude and F0 difference , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  C. Darwin,et al.  Effects of fundamental frequency and vocal-tract length changes on attention to one of two simultaneous talkers. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  B. Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Note on informational masking. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  J. Culling,et al.  Perceptual separation of concurrent speech sounds: absence of across-frequency grouping by common interaural delay. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Barbara G. Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  PERCEPTUAL CONSENQUECES OF INCLUDING REVERBERATION IN SPATIAL AUDITORY DISPLAYS , 2003 .

[31]  B. Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Informational masking: counteracting the effects of stimulus uncertainty by decreasing target-masker similarity. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  A. de Cheveigné,et al.  Vowel-specific effects in concurrent vowel identification. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  Masanao Ebata,et al.  Spatial unmasking and attention related to the cocktail party problem , 2003 .

[34]  B. Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Note on informational masking (L) , 2003 .

[35]  Stuart Gatehouse,et al.  Perceptual segregation of competing speech sounds: the role of spatial location. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.