A novel metamodel management strategy for robust trajectory design of an expendable launch vehicle

Uncertainty-based design optimization has been widely acknowledged as an advanced methodology to address competing objectives of aerospace vehicle design, such as reliability and robustness. Despite the usefulness of uncertainty-based design optimization, the computational burden associated with uncertainty propagation and analysis process still remains a major challenge of this field of study. The metamodeling is known as the most promising methodology for significantly reducing the computational cost of the uncertainty propagation process. On the other hand, the nonlinearity of the uncertainty-based design optimization problem's design space with multiple local optima reduces the accuracy and efficiency of the metamodels prediction. In this article, a novel metamodel management strategy, which controls the evolution during the optimization process, is proposed to alleviate these difficulties. For this purpose, a combination of improved Latin hypercube sampling and artificial neural networks are involved. The proposed strategy assesses the created metamodel accuracy and decides when a metamodel needs to be replaced with the real model. The metamodeling and metamodel management strategy are conspired to propose an augmented strategy for robust design optimization problems. The proposed strategy is applied to the multiobjective robust design optimization of an expendable launch vehicle. Finally, based on non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II, a compromise between optimality and robustness is illustrated through the Pareto frontier. Results illustrate that the proposed strategy could improve the computational efficiency, accuracy, and globality of optimizer convergence in uncertainty-based design optimization problems.

[1]  Jafar Roshanian,et al.  Hybrid search multi-discipline feasible design optimization of a typical Space Launch Vehicle , 2015, 2015 7th International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies (RAST).

[2]  Greg Dukeman,et al.  Rapid Trajectory Optimization for the ARES I Launch Vehicle , 2008 .

[3]  Mauro Pontani Particle swarm optimization of ascent trajectories of multistage launch vehicles , 2014 .

[4]  Surekha Kamath,et al.  Particle Swarm Optimization Applied to Ascent Phase Launch Vehicle Trajectory Optimization Problem , 2015 .

[5]  Mateen-ud-Din Qazi,et al.  Nearly-orthogonal sampling and neural network metamodel driven conceptual design of multistage space launch vehicle , 2006, Comput. Aided Des..

[6]  K. Binder,et al.  A Guide to Monte Carlo Simulations in Statistical Physics: Preface , 2005 .

[7]  Contributions to multidisciplinary design optimization under uncertainty, application to launch vehicle design. (Contributions à l'optimisation multidisciplinaire sous incertitudes, application à la conception de lanceurs) , 2015 .

[8]  S. K. Shrivastava,et al.  Determination of optimal trajectory under design constraints for a satellite launch vehicle , 1975 .

[9]  V. Adimurthy Launch vehicle trajectory optimization including rotational dynamics , 1976 .

[10]  Xiaoming X. Cheng,et al.  Efficient ascent trajectory optimization using convex models based on the Newton–Kantorovich/Pseudospectral approach , 2017 .

[11]  Thomas J. Sooy,et al.  Aerodynamic Predictions, Comparisons, and Validations Using Missile DATCOM (97) and Aeroprediction 98 (AP98) , 2005 .

[12]  Anthony J. Calise,et al.  Generation of Launch Vehicle Abort Trajectories Using a Hybrid Optimization Method , 2002 .

[13]  A. J. Booker,et al.  A rigorous framework for optimization of expensive functions by surrogates , 1998 .

[14]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  A Method for Launch Vehicle Performance Analysis via Surrogate Modeling , 2016 .

[15]  Brian M. Sutter,et al.  Six-Degree-of-Freedom Trajectory Targeting and Optimization for Titan Launch Vehicles , 1997 .

[16]  Reza Esmaelzadeh,et al.  A new approach to trajectory optimization based on direct transcription and differential flatness , 2015 .

[17]  Permoon Mateen,et al.  Hammersley Sampling and Support-Vector-Regression-Driven Launch Vehicle Design , 2007 .

[18]  Chi-Keong Goh,et al.  Computational Intelligence in Expensive Optimization Problems , 2010 .

[19]  V. Adimurthy,et al.  Launch vehicle trajectory optimization , 1986 .

[20]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization , 2009 .

[21]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  A Classification of Uncertainty for Early Product and System Design , 2007 .

[22]  N. Tzannetakis,et al.  Design optimization through parallel-generated surrogate models, optimization methodologies and the utility of legacy simulation software , 2002 .

[23]  David W. Coit,et al.  Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: A tutorial , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[24]  Christophe Talbot,et al.  Overview of some optimal control methods adapted to expendable and reusable launch vehicle trajectories , 2006 .

[25]  Masoud Ebrahimi,et al.  A novel evolution control strategy for surrogate-assisted design optimization , 2018 .

[26]  Ann-Britt Ryberg,et al.  Metamodel-Based Multidisciplinary Design Optimization for Automotive Applications , 2012 .

[27]  Peter H. Zipfel,et al.  Modeling and Simulation of Aerospace Vehicle Dynamics, Second Edition , 2007 .

[28]  Michel van Tooren,et al.  Review of uncertainty-based multidisciplinary design optimization methods for aerospace vehicles , 2011 .

[29]  I. Michael Ross,et al.  Rapid Trajectory Optimization of Multi-Agent Hybrid Systems , 2004 .

[30]  David Jeremy McCormick,et al.  Distributed uncertainty analysis techniques for conceptual launch vehicle design , 2001 .

[31]  I. Michael Ross,et al.  A Fast Approach to Multi-Stage Launch Vehicle Trajectory Optimization , 2003 .

[32]  R. Brusch Trajectory optimization for the Atlas/Centaur launch vehicle , 1977 .

[33]  Reza Jamilnia,et al.  Simultaneous optimization of staging and trajectory of launch vehicles using two different approaches , 2012 .

[34]  William B. Blake Missile Datcom: User's Manual - 1997 FORTRAN 90 Revision. , 1998 .

[35]  Ashok Joshi,et al.  Effect of Initial Flight Path Angle Error and Control Constraint on the Optimized Ascent Trajectory of a Typical Launch Vehicle , 2014 .

[36]  Hiroaki Kobayashi,et al.  Development of realistic optimization method of TSTO spaceplane - Multi-objective and robust optimization , 2004 .

[37]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  Capturing the Global Feasible Design Space for Launch Vehicle Ascent Trajectories , 2015 .

[38]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  Launch Vehicle Performance Analysis using Extreme Value Theory , 2015 .

[39]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms in Aeronautical and Aerospace Engineering , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[40]  Thomas C Manemeit Optimization and Sensitivity Analysis for a Launch Trajectory , 2014 .

[41]  Shinji Suzuki,et al.  Modified Genetic Algorithm for Constrained Trajectory Optimization , 2005 .

[42]  He Linshu,et al.  Support Vector Regression-driven Multidisciplinary Design Optimization for Multi-Stage Space Launch Vehicle Considering Throttling Effect , 2006 .

[43]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Metamodeling in Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: How Far Have We Really Come? , 2014 .

[44]  Anthony J. Calise,et al.  Further improvements to a hybrid method for launch vehicle ascent trajectory optimization , 2000 .

[45]  Jeremy Rea,et al.  Launch Vehicle Trajectory Optimization Using a Legendre Pseudospectral Method , 2003 .

[46]  Chonggang Xu,et al.  Abstract , 2001, Veterinary Record.

[47]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  A review of robust optimal design and its application in dynamics , 2005 .

[48]  Hui Tian,et al.  Uncertainty analysis and design optimization of hybrid rocket motor powered vehicle for suborbital flight , 2015 .

[49]  Bruce A. Conway,et al.  Particle Swarm Optimization Applied to Space Trajectories , 2010 .

[50]  Rodolphe Le Riche,et al.  Decoupled UMDO formulation for interdisciplinary coupling satisfaction under uncertainty , 2014 .

[51]  Rodolphe Le Riche,et al.  Challenges and future trends in Uncertainty-Based Multidisciplinary Design Optimization for space transportation system design , 2013 .

[52]  Ilya Loshchilov,et al.  Surrogate-Assisted Evolutionary Algorithms , 2013 .

[53]  Ali Kamran,et al.  Hybrid Optimization Method for Multidisciplinary Design of Air Launched Satellite Launch Vehicle , 2009 .

[54]  Sean P. Kenny,et al.  Needs and Opportunities for Uncertainty- Based Multidisciplinary Design Methods for Aerospace Vehicles , 2002 .

[55]  Geoffrey T. Parks,et al.  Review of improved Monte Carlo methods in uncertainty-based design optimization for aerospace vehicles , 2016 .

[56]  W. Buhl,et al.  Optimal ascent trajectories for advanced launch vehicles , 1992 .

[57]  Mauro Pontani,et al.  Simple method for performance evaluation of multistage rockets , 2014 .

[58]  Sergei Utyuzhnikov,et al.  Handling Uncertainty and Finding Robust Pareto Frontier in Multiobjective Optimization Using Fuzzy Set Theory , 2010 .

[59]  Jae-Woo Lee,et al.  Investigations on Missile Configuration Aerodynamic Characteristics for Design Optimization , 2014 .

[60]  Ali A. Bataleblu,et al.  Robust trajectory optimization of space launch vehicle using computational intelligence , 2015, 2015 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC).

[61]  James B. Holt,et al.  Application of Design of Experiments and Surrogate Modeling within the NASA Advanced Concepts Office, Earth-to-Orbit Design Process , 2016 .

[62]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Robustness-based design optimization under data uncertainty , 2011 .

[63]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[64]  L. Perrot,et al.  FAST AND ACCURATE INTEGRATION OF LAUNCHER TRAJECTORY APPLIED TO TRAJECTORY OPTIMIZATION , 1998 .

[65]  Roy J. Hartfield,et al.  Optimization of an Aero Assisted Launch Vehicle , 2010 .

[66]  Tarek Elhabian,et al.  Rapid Trajectory Optimization Using Computational Intelligence for Guidance and Conceptual Design of Multistage Space Launch Vehicles , 2005 .

[67]  N. P. Zeitlin,et al.  NASA ground and launch systems processing technology area roadmap , 2012, 2012 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[68]  Hans Janssen,et al.  Efficiency enhancement of optimized Latin hypercube sampling strategies: Application to Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis and meta-modeling , 2015 .

[69]  Yaochu Jin,et al.  Surrogate-assisted evolutionary computation: Recent advances and future challenges , 2011, Swarm Evol. Comput..

[70]  Ramana V. Grandhi,et al.  Improved Distributed Hypercube Sampling , 2002 .

[71]  Anthony J. Calise,et al.  Optimization of Launch Vehicle Ascent Trajectories with Path Constraints and Coast Arcs , 1999 .

[72]  J. Betts Survey of Numerical Methods for Trajectory Optimization , 1998 .

[73]  Sophia Lefantzi,et al.  DAKOTA : a multilevel parallel object-oriented framework for design optimization, parameter estimation, uncertainty quantification, and sensitivity analysis. , 2011 .

[74]  Christie Alisa Maddock,et al.  Return and abort trajectory optimisation for reusable launch vehicles , 2017 .

[75]  James B. Holt,et al.  An Expert System-Driven Method for Parametric Trajectory Optimization During Conceptual Design , 2015 .

[76]  Ali Kamran,et al.  Integrated System Design of Air Launched Small Space Launch Vehicle using Genetic Algorithm , 2009 .