Digital slide imaging in cervicovaginal cytology: a pilot study.

CONTEXT Digital whole slide imaging is the anticipated future of anatomic pathology, where sign-out of glass slides will be replaced by scanned images. Whole slide imaging has been successfully used in surgical pathology, but its usefulness and clinical application have been limited in cytology for several reasons, including lack of availability of z-axis depth focusing and large file size. Recently, several systems have become available in the United States for whole slide imaging with z-axis technology. OBJECTIVE To determine the accuracy and efficiency of whole slide imaging, as compared with traditional glass slides, for use in cervicovaginal diagnostic cytology. DESIGN Eleven cervicovaginal cytology cases (ThinPrep and SurePath) scanned at ×20, ×40, and ×40 z-stack magnifications using the BioImagene iScan Coreo Au 3.0 scanner were evaluated by 4 cytotechnologists and 3 pathologists in a blinded study. Different magnification scans were recorded as separate cases and presented in a randomized sequence. Corresponding glass slides were also reviewed. For each case, the diagnoses and total time to reach each diagnosis were recorded. RESULTS Diagnostic accuracy was higher and average time per case was lower with glass slides as compared with all digital images. Among the digital images, the ×40 or ×40 z-stack had the highest diagnostic accuracy and lowest interpretation time. CONCLUSIONS Whole slide imaging is a viable option for the purposes of teaching and consultations, and as a means of archiving cases. However, considering the large file size and total time to reach diagnosis on digital images, whole slide imaging is not yet ready for daily cervicovaginal diagnostic cytology screening use.

[1]  Liron Pantanowitz,et al.  Digital Imaging in Cytopathology , 2011, Pathology research international.

[2]  A. Evans,et al.  Frequently asked questions concerning the use of whole-slide imaging telepathology for neuropathology frozen sections. , 2010, Seminars in diagnostic pathology.

[3]  Mari Mino-Kenudson,et al.  Whole-slide imaging digital pathology as a platform for teleconsultation: a pilot study using paired subspecialist correlations. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[4]  Jaime Rodriguez-Canales,et al.  EGFR and KRAS mutation analysis in cytologic samples of lung adenocarcinoma enabled by laser capture microdissection , 2012, Modern Pathology.

[5]  Liron Pantanowitz,et al.  The impact of digital imaging in the field of cytopathology , 2009, CytoJournal.

[6]  John D. Pfeifer,et al.  Review of the current state of whole slide imaging in pathology , 2011, Journal of pathology informatics.

[7]  Lewis A. Hassell,et al.  Whole Slide Images and Digital Media in Pathology Education, Testing, and Practice: The Oklahoma Experience , 2011, Analytical cellular pathology.

[8]  David C Wilbur,et al.  A novel automated screening and interpretation process for cervical cytology using the internet transmission of low‐resolution images , 2005, Cancer.

[9]  Thomas Gahm,et al.  Digital Imagery/Telecytology , 1998, Acta Cytologica.

[10]  Shaimaa Al-Janabi,et al.  Whole slide images for primary diagnostics of gastrointestinal tract pathology: a feasibility study. , 2012, Human pathology.

[11]  In Sun Kim,et al.  Accuracy and reproducibility of telecytology diagnosis of cervical smears. A tool for quality assurance programs. , 2003, American journal of clinical pathology.

[12]  Tim-Rasmus Kiehl,et al.  Primary frozen section diagnosis by robotic microscopy and virtual slide telepathology: the University Health Network experience. , 2009, Human pathology.

[13]  D L Rosenthal,et al.  Telecytology: intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of cervical-vaginal smears. , 2001, Human pathology.