Generative retrieval results in positive academic emotions and long-term retention of cardiovascular anatomy using transthoracic echocardiography.

With increasing medical knowledge, procedural, and diagnostic skills to learn, it is vital for educators to make the limited amount of teaching time available to students effective and efficient. Generative retrieval is an effective and efficient learning tool, improving long-term retention through the practice of retrieval from memory. Forty medical students were randomized to learn normal cardiovascular anatomy using transthoracic echocardiography video clips in a generative retrieval (GR) or standard practice (SP) group. GR participants were required to verbally identify each unlabeled cardiovascular structure after viewing the video. After answering, participants viewed the correctly labeled video. SP participants viewed the same video clips labeled with the correct cardiovascular structure for the same amount of total time without verbally generating an answer. All participants were tested for intermediate (1-wk), late (1-mo), and long-term (6- to 9-mo) retention of cardiovascular anatomy. Additionally, a three-question survey was incorporated to assess perceptions of the learning method. There was no difference in pretest scores. The GR group demonstrated a trend toward improvement in recall at 1 wk [GR = 74.3 (SD 12.3); SP = 65.4 (SD 16.7); P = 0.10] and 1 mo [GR = 69.9 (SD15.6); SP = 64.3 (SD 15.4); P = 0.33]. At the 6- to 9-mo time point, there was a statistically significant difference in scores [GR = 74.3 (SD 9.9); SP = 65.0 (SD 14.1); P = 0.042]. At nearly every time point, learners had a statistically significantly higher perception of effectiveness, enjoyment, and satisfaction with GR. In addition to improved recall, GR is associated with increased perceptions of effectiveness, enjoyment, and satisfaction, which may lead to increased engagement, time spent studying, and improved retention.

[1]  M. Ochs,et al.  Hands‐on or no hands‐on training in ultrasound imaging: A randomized trial to evaluate learning outcomes and speed of recall of topographic anatomy , 2018, Anatomical sciences education.

[2]  John L. Dobson,et al.  Retrieval practice enhances the ability to evaluate complex physiology information , 2018, Medical education.

[3]  T. Raupach,et al.  The effect of repeated testing vs repeated practice on skills learning in undergraduate dental education , 2018, European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe.

[4]  Rocio Glaria,et al.  Relationship among academic engagement, burnout and student perceptions of curriculum delivery in Speech and Language Therapy Students from University of Concepcion, Chile. , 2017, JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association.

[5]  John L. Dobson,et al.  Distributed retrieval practice promotes superior recall of anatomy information , 2017, Anatomical sciences education.

[6]  Alexander J. Sannella,et al.  Student Engagement as a General Factor of Classroom Experience: Associations with Student Practices and Educational Outcomes in a University Gateway Course , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[7]  Jennie Z. Ma,et al.  Generative Retrieval Improves Learning and Retention of Cardiac Anatomy Using Transesophageal Echocardiography , 2017, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[8]  S. Orebaugh,et al.  Ultrasound imaging in medical student education: Impact on learning anatomy and physical diagnosis , 2017, Anatomical sciences education.

[9]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  The Role of Episodic Context in Retrieval Practice Effects , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  S. R. Staugaard,et al.  Does retrieval intentionality really matter? Similarities and differences between involuntary memories and directly and generatively retrieved voluntary memories. , 2016, British journal of psychology.

[11]  T. Raupach,et al.  Test‐enhanced learning of clinical reasoning: a crossover randomised trial , 2016, Medical education.

[12]  John L Dobson,et al.  Self-testing produces superior recall of both familiar and unfamiliar muscle information. , 2015, Advances in physiology education.

[13]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Do students use testing and feedback while learning? A focus on key concept definitions and learning to criterion , 2015 .

[14]  John L. Dobson,et al.  The effect of selected “desirable difficulties” on the ability to recall anatomy information , 2015, Anatomical sciences education.

[15]  Gregory A. Brown,et al.  Online quizzes promote inconsistent improvements on in-class test performance in introductory anatomy and physiology. , 2015, Advances in physiology education.

[16]  John L. Dobson,et al.  Self-testing promotes superior retention of anatomy and physiology information , 2015, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[17]  Jane C. Johnson,et al.  Impact of the clinical ultrasound elective course on retention of anatomical knowledge by second‐year medical students in preparation for board exams , 2015, Clinical anatomy.

[18]  C. St-Onge,et al.  The benefits of testing for learning on later performance , 2014, Advances in Health Sciences Education.

[19]  Heather Carnahan,et al.  Test‐enhanced learning and its effect on comprehension and diagnostic accuracy , 2014, Medical education.

[20]  J. Reeve How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. , 2013 .

[21]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Covert retrieval practice benefits retention as much as overt retrieval practice. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  Claudia E Korcarz,et al.  Focused cardiac ultrasound: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography. , 2013, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[23]  John L Dobson,et al.  Retrieval practice is an efficient method of enhancing the retention of anatomy and physiology information. , 2013, Advances in physiology education.

[24]  Heather Carnahan,et al.  Integration of basic sciences and clinical sciences in oral radiology education for dental students. , 2013, Journal of dental education.

[25]  M. Stringer,et al.  Using real-time ultrasound to teach living anatomy: an alternative model for large classes. , 2012, The New Zealand medical journal.

[26]  G. Harris,et al.  The Christchurch Breast Cancer Patient Register: the first year. , 2012, The New Zealand medical journal.

[27]  Michael C. Rodriguez,et al.  Exploring the Student Engagement Instrument and Career Perceptions with College Students , 2012 .

[28]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Separate mnemonic effects of retrieval practice and elaborative encoding , 2012 .

[29]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding? , 2012, Memory & cognition.

[30]  Mikko Inkinen,et al.  Capturing teacher students’ emotional experiences in context: does inquiry-based learning make a difference? , 2012 .

[31]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Retrieval Practice Produces More Learning than Elaborative Studying with Concept Mapping , 2011, Science.

[32]  C. Ringsted,et al.  Test‐enhanced learning may be a gender‐related phenomenon explained by changes in cortisol level , 2011, Medical education.

[33]  A. Zumwalt,et al.  Building the body: Active learning laboratories that emphasize practical aspects of anatomy and integration with radiology , 2010, Anatomical sciences education.

[34]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Retrieval Mode Distinguishes the Testing Effect from the Generation Effect. , 2010 .

[35]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Metacognitive control and strategy selection: deciding to practice retrieval during learning. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[36]  R. Bjork,et al.  Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance subsequent learning. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  Lisa K. Son,et al.  Learners’ choices and beliefs about self-testing , 2009, Memory.

[38]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practise retrieval when they study on their own? , 2009, Memory.

[39]  G. Ladd,et al.  Continuity and Change in Early School Engagement: Predictive of Children's Achievement Trajectories from First to Eighth Grade? , 2009, Journal of educational psychology.

[40]  Charlotte Ringsted,et al.  The effect of testing on skills learning , 2009, Medical education.

[41]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  The Critical Importance of Retrieval for Learning , 2008, Science.

[42]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Repeated retrieval during learning is the key to long-term retention , 2007 .

[43]  Jennifer A. Fredricks,et al.  School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence , 2004 .

[44]  David J. Shernoff,et al.  Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. , 2003 .

[45]  T. Goetz,et al.  Academic Emotions in Students' Self-Regulated Learning and Achievement: A Program of Qualitative and Quantitative Research , 2002 .

[46]  U. Teichgräber,et al.  Ultrasound anatomy: a practical teaching system in human gross anatomy , 1996, Medical education.

[47]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Improving Self-Regulated Learning With a Retrieval Practice Intervention , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[48]  Silke L. Schneider The Conceptualisation , Measurement , and Coding of Education in German and Cross-National Surveys , 2016 .

[49]  Adam L. Putnam,et al.  Does response mode affect amount recalled or the magnitude of the testing effect? , 2013, Memory & cognition.

[50]  Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia,et al.  Academic Emotions and Student Engagement , 2012 .

[51]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  The Power of Testing Memory Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice , 2006 .