L2 writing in test and non-test situations: Process and product

Test writers sometimes complain they cannot perform to their true abilities because of time constraints. We therefore examined differences in terms of process and product between texts produced under test and non-test conditions. Ten L2 postgraduates wrote two argumentative essays, one under test conditions, with only forty minutes being allowed and without recourse to resources, and one under non-test conditions, with unlimited time as well as access to the Internet. Keystroke logging, screen capture software, and stimulated recall protocols were used, participants explaining and commenting on their writing processes. Sixteen writing process ttypes were identified. Higher proportions of the processes of translation and surface revision were recorded in the test situation, while meaningful revision and evaluation were both higher in the non-test situation. There was a statistically significant difference between time allocation for different processes at different stages. Experienced teachers awarded the non-test texts a mean score of almost one point (0.8) higher. A correlational analysis examining the relationship between writing process and product quality showed that while the distribution of writing processes can have an impact on text quality in the test situation, it had no effect on the product in the non-testt situation.

[1]  Susan D. Bosher,et al.  The composing processes of three Southeast Asian writers at the post-secondary level: An exploratory study , 1998 .

[2]  Veerle M. Baaijen,et al.  Keystroke Analysis , 2012 .

[3]  Hayes.  identifying the organization of wi iiing processes , 1980 .

[4]  E. Hall.  Variations in Composing Behaviours of Academic ESL Writers in Test and Non-test Situations , 1991 .

[5]  W. Grabe,et al.  Theory and Practice of Writing: An Applied Linguistic Perspective , 1998 .

[6]  L. Faigley,et al.  The Role of Writing Apprehension in Writing Performance and Competence , 1981 .

[7]  Andrew Morozov.  Student attitudes toward the assessment criteria in writing-intensive college courses , 2011 .

[8]  Hiroe Kobayashi,et al.  Effects of First Language on Second Language Writing: Translation versus Direct Composition† , 1992 .

[9]  Tony Silva.  Toward an Understanding of the Distinct Nature of L2 Writing: The ESL Research and Its Implications , 1993 .

[10]  Charlene Polio,et al.  “If I only had more time:” ESL learners' changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions , 1998 .

[11]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  The psychology of written composition , 1987 .

[12]  Alister Cumming,et al.  WRITING EXPERTISE AND SECOND LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY , 1989 .

[13]  Martin East.  Dictionary Use in Foreign Language Writing Exams: Impact and implications , 2008 .

[14]  R. T. Kellogg.  Effects of topic knowledge on the allocation of processing time and cognitive effort to writing processes , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[15]  Liz Hamp-Lyons,et al.  Assessing the Portfolio: Principles for Practice, Theory, and Research , 2000 .

[16]  Sheldon Rosenberg,et al.  Effects of a high information-processing load on the writing process and the story written , 1995, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[17]  INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNING: THE DYNAMICS OF BELIEFS ABOUT L2 WRITING , 2009 .

[18]  S. Graham,et al.  The Role of Self-Regulation and Transcription Skills in Writing and Writing Development , 2000 .

[19]  Miyuki Sasaki,et al.  Toward an Empirical Model of EFL Writing Processes: An Exploratory Study , 2000 .