Increased delivery of aerosol to a model lung (attached to a mechanical ventilator) has been demonstrated with an ultrasonic nebulizer as compared to a jet nebulizer. This study examined whether the increased aerosol deposition with an ultrasonic nebulizer could also be demonstrated in vivo. Seven patients (6 male and 1 female) were studied during mechanical ventilalion (Siemens Servo 900C, Middlesex, UK) after open heart surgery. Two studies were performed in each patient. In the first study, aerosol was delivered via a Siemens Servo 945 nebulizer system (high setting) driving a System 22 Acorn jet nebulizer (Medic-Aid, Sussex, UK) containing 3 mL (99m)technetium-labelled human serum albumin (99mTc-HSA) (50 microg; activity 74 MBq). In the second study, a DP100 ultrasonic nebulizer (DP Medical, Meylan, France) containing 12 mL 99mTc-HSA (50 microg; activity 185 MBq) was used. Pulmonary deposition was quantified using a gamma camera. The humidification of the circuit and the ventilator settings were kept constant according to the patient's clinical requirements. The total lung aerosol deposition (mean+/-SD), as a percentage of initial nebulizer activity, was greater using the ultrasonic nebulizer than using the jet nebulizer (53+/-1.4 vs 2.3+/-0.9%; p<0.002). The ultrasonic nebulizer was also associated with a reduction in the time required to complete nebulization (9 vs 21 min, respectively) (p<0.0001). Use of the DP100 ultrasonic nebulizer more than doubled lung deposition compared with the System 22 jet nebulizers in mechanically-ventilated patients. Their efficiency, speed of drug delivery, and compatibility with mechanical ventilator circuits make ultrasonic nebulizers potentially attractive for use during mechanical ventilation.
[1]
M. O'Doherty,et al.
Effect of a spacer on pulmonary aerosol deposition from a jet nebuliser during mechanical ventilation.
,
1995,
Thorax.
[2]
M. O'Doherty,et al.
Delivery of a nebulized aerosol to a lung model during mechanical ventilation. Effect of ventilator settings and nebulizer type, position, and volume of fill.
,
1992,
The American review of respiratory disease.
[3]
R. Perry,et al.
Nebulizer function during mechanical ventilation.
,
1992,
The American review of respiratory disease.
[4]
M. Silverman,et al.
Delivery of therapeutic aerosols to intubated babies.
,
1992,
Archives of disease in childhood.
[5]
M. O'Doherty,et al.
Variability in the measurement of nebulized aerosol deposition in man.
,
1991,
Clinical science.
[6]
M. Silverman,et al.
Evaluation of nebulizers for use in neonatal ventilator circuits.
,
1990,
Critical care medicine.
[7]
M. Newhouse,et al.
Pressurized aerosol versus jet aerosol delivery to mechanically ventilated patients. Comparison of dose to the lungs.
,
1990,
The American review of respiratory disease.
[8]
R. Coleman,et al.
Aerosol delivery in intubated, mechanically ventilated patients
,
1985,
Critical care medicine.
[9]
T. O'riordan,et al.
Aerosol deposition in mechanically ventilated patients. Optimizing nebulizer delivery.
,
1994,
American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.