Model Based Evaluation of Bridge Decks Using Ground Penetrating Radar

: Ground penetrating radar (GPR) has become a viable technology for non-destructive condition assessment of reinforced concrete structures. Interpretation of the radar signal is typically performed through preliminary filtering techniques and interpretation is based on viewing numerous signals in the form of a scan. Although anomalies can be evident in the scanned image, quantification and interpretation of the main issue remain ambiguous. This article presents the ambiguity and common methods of interpretation based on response amplitude and travel time. An integrated medium is developed and used as a forward modeling tool to generate a realistic radar reflection of a reinforced concrete bridge deck with defects. A healthy deck reflection is obtained from a separate model and is combined with an inverse solution to quantifiably estimate unknown subsurface properties such as layer thickness and dielectric constants of subsurface materials evident in the realistic radar trace as well as. The forward modeling tool and associated model based assessment provides an objective computational alternative to the interpretation of scanned images.

[1]  Vincenzo Barrile,et al.  Application of radar technology to reinforced concrete structures: a case study , 2005 .

[2]  W. Hassenzahl.  FIELD QUALITY OF THE END SECTIONS OF SSC DIPOLES , 1987 .

[3]  A. Taflove,et al.  Numerical Solution of Steady-State Electromagnetic Scattering Problems Using the Time-Dependent Maxwell's Equations , 1975 .

[4]  K R Maser,et al.  MODELING THE ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPERTIES OF CONCRETE , 1993 .

[5]  R. G. Plumb,et al.  Ground-penetrating radar antenna modeling , 1996, IGARSS '96. 1996 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[6]  Lawrence Carin,et al.  Ultra-wideband, short-pulse ground-penetrating radar: simulation and measurement , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[7]  Kavitha Arunachalam,et al.  Microwave NDT of cement-based materials using far-field reflection coefficients , 2006 .

[8]  Masanobu Shinozuka,et al.  ELECTROMAGNETIC IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION FOR DAMAGE DETECTION , 2000 .

[9]  James S. Mellett,et al.  Ground penetrating radar applications in engineering, environmental management, and geology , 1995 .

[10]  Steve Millard,et al.  Location of steel reinforcement in concrete using ground penetrating radar and neural networks , 2005 .

[11]  G. Arliguie,et al.  Ability of the direct wave of radar ground-coupled antenna for NDT of concrete structures , 2006 .

[12]  Carey M. Rappaport.  Interpreting and improving the PML absorbing boundary condition using anisotropic lossy mapping of space , 1996 .

[13]  Imad L. Al-Qadi,et al.  OPTIMIZATION OF GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR DATA TO PREDICT LAYER THICKNESSES IN FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS , 2003 .

[14]  R. G. Plumb,et al.  Introducing the effects of dispersive media into the finite-difference time-domain algorithm [ground-penetrating radar] , 1998, IGARSS '98. Sensing and Managing the Environment. 1998 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing. Symposium Proceedings. (Cat. No.98CH36174).

[15]  Richard G. Plumb,et al.  A matched-filter-based reverse-time migration algorithm for ground-penetrating radar data , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[16]  Weng Cho Chew,et al.  Finite-difference time-domain simulation of ground penetrating radar on dispersive, inhomogeneous, and conductive soils , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[17]  Hung-Liang Chen,et al.  Detection of Sub-Surface Anomalies in Concrete Bridge Decks using Ground Penetrating Radar , 1997 .

[18]  G. Mur.  Absorbing Boundary Conditions for the Finite-Difference Approximation of the Time-Domain Electromagnetic-Field Equations , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[19]  M. Sadiku.  Numerical Techniques in Electromagnetics , 2000 .

[20]  Allen Taflove,et al.  The Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FD-TD) Method for Electromagnetic Scattering and Interaction Problems , 1987 .

[21]  Kenneth R. Maser.  Automated Interpretation for Sensing in Situ Conditions , 1988 .

[22]  Udaya B. Halabe,et al.  Condition assessment of reinforced concrete structures using electromagnetic waves , 1993 .

[23]  B. Strand,et al.  Solving inverse electromagnetic problems using FDTD and gradient‐based minimization , 2006 .

[24]  Kun Jiang,et al.  Bridge Deck Reinforcing Steel Cover Depth Prediction Using GPR , 2006 .

[25]  Magda El-Shenawee,et al.  Suppressing GPR Clutter from Randomly Rough Ground Surfaces to Enhance Nonmetallic Mine Detection , 2003 .

[26]  T. Scullion,et al.  Road evaluation with ground penetrating radar , 2000 .

[27]  H. Chen,et al.  Finite-difference time-domain simulation of GPR data , 1998 .

[28]  Oral Buyukozturk,et al.  ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPERTIES OF CONCRETE AT MICROWAVE FREQUENCY RANGE , 1998 .

[29]  Andreas Becht,et al.  Inversion strategy in crosshole radar tomography using information of data subsets , 2004 .

[30]  Paul A. Bosela,et al.  Application of Nondestructive Evaluation to Subway Tunnel Systems , 2003 .

[31]  Christopher L. Barnes,et al.  EFFECTIVENESS OF GROUND PENETRATING RADAR IN PREDICTING DECK REPAIR QUANTITIES , 2004 .

[32]  Carey M. Rappaport,et al.  A general method for FDTD modeling of wave propagation in arbitrary frequency-dispersive media , 1997 .

[33]  Julie Q. Shang,et al.  Measurement of Complex Permittivity of Asphalt Pavement Materials , 1999 .

[34]  A. Benedetto,et al.  Reliability of signal processing technique for pavement damages detection and classification using ground penetrating radar , 2005, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[35]  Jean-Pierre Berenger,et al.  A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves , 1994 .

[36]  Imad L. Al-Qadi,et al.  Dielectric Properties of Portland Cement Concrete at Low Radio Frequencies , 1995 .

[37]  K. Yee.  Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving maxwell's equations in isotropic media , 1966 .