A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories

The decomposition of scientific literature into disciplinary and subdisciplinary structures is one of the core goals of scientometrics. How can we achieve a good decomposition? The ISI subject categories classify journals included in the Science Citation Index (SCI). The aggregated journal-journal citation matrix contained in the Journal Citation Reports can be aggregated on the basis of these categories. This leads to an asymmetrical matrix (citing versus cited) that is much more densely populated than the underlying matrix at the journal level. Exploratory factor analysis of the matrix of subject categories suggests a 14-factor solution. This solution could be interpreted as the disciplinary structure of science. The nested maps of science (corresponding to 14 factors, 172 categories, and 6,164 journals) are online at . Presumably, inaccuracies in the attribution of journals to the ISI subject categories average out so that the factor analysis reveals the main structures. The mapping of science could, therefore, be comprehensive and reliable on a large scale albeit imprecise in terms of the attribution of journals to the ISI subject categories. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Mapping the backbone of science , 2004, Scientometrics.

[2]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Top-down decomposition of the Journal Citation Reportof the Social Science Citation Index: Graph- and factor-analytical approaches , 2004, Scientometrics.

[3]  R. May.  The Scientific Wealth of Nations , 1997, Science.

[4]  Bruce Hendrickson,et al.  Knowledge Mining With VxInsight: Discovery Through Interaction , 1998, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems.

[5]  Lois Mai Chan.  A Guide to the Library of Congress Classification. Fifth Edition. Library and Information Science Text Series. , 1999 .

[6]  Alexander I. Pudovkin,et al.  Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[7]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The development of frames of references , 1986, Scientometrics.

[8]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Pajek - Program for Large Network Analysis , 1999 .

[9]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Nanotechnology as a field of science: Its delineation in terms of journals and patents , 2007, Scientometrics.

[10]  M. Newman,et al.  Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents , 1973, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[12]  B. C. Griffith,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Literatures I: Identifying and Graphing Specialties , 1974 .

[13]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes , 2004, Scientometrics.

[14]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Betweenness Centrality" as an Indicator of the , 2006 .

[15]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Mapping the structure and evolution of chemistry research , 2009, Scientometrics.

[16]  Francis Narin,et al.  Clustering of scientific journals , 1973, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[17]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Various methods for the mapping of science , 1987, Scientometrics.

[18]  B. Martin,et al.  Some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy , 1983 .

[19]  F. Fisher,et al.  Near-Decomposability, Partition and Aggregation, and the Relevance of Stability Discussions , 1963 .

[20]  Jae-On Kim,et al.  Factor Analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues , 1978 .

[21]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Metaphors and Diaphors in Science Communication , 2005 .

[22]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  How cross-disciplinary is bionanotechnology? Explorations in the specialty of molecular motors , 2007, Scientometrics.

[23]  Derek J. de Solla Price,et al.  The science/technology relationship, the craft of experimental science, and policy for the improvement of high technology innovation☆ , 1993 .

[24]  Patrick Doreian,et al.  Structural equivalence in a journal network , 1985, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[25]  Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez,et al.  A new technique for building maps of large scientific domains based on the cocitation of classes and categories , 2004, Scientometrics.

[26]  Loet Leydesdorff.  Visualization of the citation impact environments of scientific journals: An online mapping exercise , 2007 .

[27]  Bernward Joerges,et al.  The Transverse Science and Technology Culture: Dynamics and Roles of Research-technology , 2002 .

[28]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Interdisciplinary dynamics of modern science: analysis of cross-disciplinary citation flows , 2000 .

[29]  L. Leydesdorff.  Caveats for the use of citation indicators in research and journal evaluations , 2008 .

[30]  Michel Zitt,et al.  Facing Diversity of Science: A Challenge for Bibliometric Indicators , 2005 .

[31]  E. Garfield.  Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. , 1972, Science.

[32]  Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez,et al.  Visualizing the marrow of science , 2007 .

[33]  A. Porter,et al.  Interdisciplinary research: meaning, metrics and nurture , 2006 .

[34]  M. Callon,et al.  From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis , 1983 .

[35]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Co-occurrence matrices and their applications in information science: Extending ACA to the Web environment , 2006 .

[36]  Michael McGill,et al.  Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval , 1983 .

[37]  Loet Leydesdorff.  Can scientific journals be classified in terms of aggregated journal-journal citation relations using the Journal Citation Reports? , 2006 .

[38]  Stephen J. Bensman.  Bradford's Law and Fuzzy Sets: Statistical Implications for Library Analyses , 2001 .

[39]  H. Simon,et al.  Near decomposability and the speed of evolution , 2002 .

[40]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity , 2007, Scientometrics.

[41]  Anthony Rj. Van Raan.  4. The Interdisciplinary Nature of Science: Theoretical Framework and Bibliometric-Empirical Approach , 2000 .

[42]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Aggregation of Variables in Dynamic Systems , 1961 .

[43]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[44]  Patrick Doreian,et al.  Structural equivalence in a psychology journal network , 1985, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[45]  H. Simon,et al.  The Organization of Complex Systems , 1977 .

[46]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The relation between Pearson's correlation coefficient r and Salton's cosine measure , 2009, ArXiv.

[47]  M E J Newman,et al.  Modularity and community structure in networks. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  R. Burt.  Toward a structural theory of action , 1982 .

[49]  G. Furnas,et al.  Pictures of relevance: a geometric analysis of similarity measures , 1987 .

[50]  Ronald N. Kostoff,et al.  Global nanotechnology research metrics , 2007, Scientometrics.

[51]  Loet Leydesdorff.  Words and co-words as indicators of intellectual organization , 1989 .

[52]  M. Callon,et al.  Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology , 1986 .

[53]  S. Bradford.  "Sources of information on specific subjects" by S.C. Bradford , 1985 .

[54]  Stephen J. Bensman,et al.  Classification and powerlaws: The logarithmic transformation , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[55]  Isabel Gómez,et al.  An approach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicators , 2001, Scientometrics.

[56]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Clustering thescience citation index® using co-citations , 1985, Scientometrics.

[57]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[58]  D J PRICE,et al.  NETWORKS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS. , 1965, Science.

[59]  H. Moed,et al.  The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance , 1985 .

[60]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Clusters and Maps of Science Journals Based on Bi-connected Graphs in the Journal Citation Reports , 2009, ArXiv.

[61]  Isabel Gómez,et al.  Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[62]  Satoru Kawai,et al.  An Algorithm for Drawing General Undirected Graphs , 1989, Inf. Process. Lett..

[63]  Michel Zitt,et al.  Relativity of citation performance and excellence measures: From cross-field to cross-scale effects of field-normalisation , 2005, Scientometrics.

[64]  Loet Leydesdroff.  Words and co-words as indicators of intellectual organization , 1989 .

[65]  Joachim Schummer,et al.  Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology , 2004, Scientometrics.

[66]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Dynamic animations of journal maps: Indicators of structural changes and interdisciplinary developments , 2008 .

[67]  Stephen J. Bensman.  Distributional differences of the impact factor in the sciences versus the social sciences: An analysis of the probabilistic structure of the 2005 journal citation reports , 2008 .

[68]  María Bordons,et al.  Analysis of Cross-Disciplinary Research Through Bibliometric Tools , 2004 .