Periprocedural Mortality in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the PROGRESS-CTO Registry

Background: Death is a rare but devastating complication of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods: We examined the clinical characteristics and procedural outcomes of patients who died periprocedurally in the Prospective Global Registry for the Study of CTO Interventions (PROGRESS-CTO). Results: Of the 12 928 patients who underwent CTO percutaneous coronary intervention between 2012 and 2022, 52 (0.4%) died during the index hospitalization. Patients who died were more likely to have a history of heart failure (43% versus 28%; P=0.023). The J-CTO ([Multicenter CTO Registry of Japan]; 2.8±1.1 versus 2.4±1.3; P=0.019), PROGRESS-CTO mortality (2.6±0.9 versus 1.6±1.1; P<0.001), and PROGRESS-CTO pericardiocentesis (2.9±1.1 versus 1.9±1.3; P<0.001) scores were higher in patients who died. In these patients, the use of left ventricular assist devices was also higher (41% versus 3.5%; P<0.001), and retrograde crossing was more often the first crossing strategy (33% versus 13%; P<0.001). The cause of death was cardiac in 43 patients (83%) and noncardiac in 9 patients (17%). Complications leading to cardiac death were: tamponade in 30 patients (58%), acute myocardial infarction in 9 (17.3%), and cardiac arrest/shock in 4 (7.7%). Noncardiac causes of death were: stroke in 3 (5.8%), renal failure in 2 (3.8%), respiratory distress in 2 (3.8%), and hemorrhagic shock in 2 (3.8%). Conclusions: Approximately 0.4% of patients who underwent CTO percutaneous coronary intervention died during the index hospitalization. The main cause of death was tamponade in 58%. PROGRESS-CTO complication scores might help in risk stratification and procedural planning in patients undergoing CTO percutaneous coronary intervention. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT02061436.

[1]  F. Jaffer,et al.  External validation of the PROGRESS-CTO complication risk scores: Individual patient data pooled analysis of 3 registries. , 2022, International Journal of Cardiology.

[2]  F. Jaffer,et al.  Validation of the OPEN-CLEAN Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Perforation Score in a Multicenter Registry. , 2022, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  S. Garcia,et al.  A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. , 2022, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[4]  E. Mahmud,et al.  Development and validation of a scoring system for predicting clinical coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions: the PROGRESS-CTO perforation score. , 2022, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[5]  E. Mahmud,et al.  Incidence, Mechanisms, Treatment, and Outcomes of Coronary Artery Perforation During Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2022, The American Journal of Cardiology.

[6]  L. Azzalini The New PROGRESS-CTO Complication Scores: The Peace of Mind of Taking a Calculated Risk. , 2022, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[7]  F. Jaffer,et al.  Predicting Periprocedural Complications in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The PROGRESS-CTO Complication Scores. , 2022, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[8]  S. Garcia,et al.  Incidence, Treatment, and Outcomes of Coronary Artery Perforation During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. , 2022, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[9]  E. Brilakis,et al.  Femoral or Radial Approach in Treatment of Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion: A Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2022, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[10]  L. Stanberry,et al.  Assessment of the OPEN-CLEAN Chronic total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Perforation score in the PROGRESS-CTO Registry. , 2022, Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions.

[11]  J. Spratt,et al.  Defining Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Complexity and Risk: An Analysis of the United Kingdom BCIS Database 2006-2016. , 2022, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[12]  R. Virmani,et al.  Definitions and Clinical Trial Design Principles for Coronary Artery Chronic Total Occlusion Therapies: CTO-ARC Consensus Recommendations. , 2021, Circulation.

[13]  B. Beleslin,et al.  Randomized Controlled Comparison of Optimal Medical Therapy with Percutaneous Recanalization of Chronic Total Occlusion (COMET-CTO). , 2021, International heart journal.

[14]  J. Moses,et al.  Development and validation of a prediction model for angiographic perforation during chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: OPEN‐CLEAN perforation score , 2021, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[15]  J. Spertus,et al.  Outcomes of retrograde chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: A report from the OPEN‐CTO registry , 2020, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[16]  J. Ottervanger,et al.  Complex Large-Bore Radial percutaneous coronary intervention: rationale of the COLOR trial study protocol , 2020, BMJ Open.

[17]  J. Mangione,et al.  Chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention in Latin America , 2020, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[18]  M. Montorfano,et al.  Long-Term Outcomes of Chronic Total Occlusion Recanalization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Complex Non-Occlusive Coronary Artery Disease. , 2019, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  Yuji Hamazaki,et al.  Assessment of reattempted percutaneous coronary intervention strategy for chronic total occlusion after prior failed procedures: Analysis of the Japanese CTO‐PCI Expert Registry , 2019, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[20]  Paul A. Harris,et al.  The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners , 2019, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[21]  Seung‐Jung Park,et al.  Randomized Trial Evaluating Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for the Treatment of Chronic Total Occlusion: The DECISION-CTO Trial , 2019, Circulation.

[22]  P. Arora,et al.  Incidence and in-hospital outcomes of single-vessel coronary chronic total occlusion treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2018, International journal of cardiology.

[23]  C. Di Mario,et al.  Temporal Trends in Chronic Total Occlusion Interventions in Europe: 17 626 Procedures From the European Registry of Chronic Total Occlusion , 2018, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[24]  F. Neumann,et al.  A Randomized Trial to Assess Regional Left Ventricular Function After Stent Implantation in Chronic Total Occlusion: The REVASC Trial. , 2018, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[25]  C. Di Mario,et al.  A randomized multicentre trial to compare revascularization with optimal medical therapy for the treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions , 2018, European heart journal.

[26]  E. Kretov,et al.  The IMPACTOR-CTO Trial. , 2018, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[27]  E. Brilakis,et al.  Long-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Total Occlusion in Patients Who Have Undergone Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting vs Those Who Have Not. , 2017, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[28]  J. Spertus,et al.  Early Procedural and Health Status Outcomes After Chronic Total Occlusion Angioplasty: A Report From the OPEN-CTO Registry (Outcomes, Patient Health Status, and Efficiency in Chronic Total Occlusion Hybrid Procedures). , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[29]  Jacqueline L. Green,et al.  Coronary artery perforations after contemporary percutaneous coronary interventions: Evaluation of incidence, risk factors, outcomes, and predictors of mortality , 2017, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[30]  J. Spratt,et al.  The Hybrid Algorithm for Treating Chronic Total Occlusions in Europe: The RECHARGE Registry. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[31]  J. Tijssen,et al.  Percutaneous Intervention for Concurrent Chronic Total Occlusions in Patients With STEMI: The EXPLORE Trial. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[32]  Jennifer Taylor Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. , 2012, European heart journal.

[33]  Y. Hayashi,et al.  Predicting successful guidewire crossing through chronic total occlusion of native coronary lesions within 30 minutes: the J-CTO (Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan) score as a difficulty grading and time assessment tool. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[34]  P. Harris,et al.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap) - A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support , 2009, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[35]  S. Ellis,et al.  Increased Coronary Perforation in the New Device Era: Incidence, Classification, Management, and Outcome , 1994, Circulation.

[36]  Maarten L. Simoons,et al.  The third universal definition of myocardial infarction , 2013 .