The application of neural networks in predicting the outcome of in-vitro fertilization.

Infertility affects one in six couples at some time in their lives, with 48% of these couples requiring assisted conception techniques in order to achieve a pregnancy. Whilst the overall clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer is 23%, this varies widely between clinics. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority has attempted to analyse the results of all units, with weighting of different factors affecting assisted conception, and the published data have invariably led to comparisons between units. However, statistical models need to be developed to eliminate bias for valid comparisons. Neural networks offer a novel approach to pattern recognition. In some instances neural networks can identify a wider range of associations than other statistical techniques due in part to their ability to recognize highly non-linear associations. It was hoped that a neural network approach may be able to predict success for individual couples about to undergo in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. A neural network was constructed using the variables of age, number of eggs recovered, number of embryos transferred and whether there was embryo freezing. Overall the network managed to achieve an accuracy of 59%.

[1]  T. Roseboom,et al.  The probability of pregnancy after embryo transfer is affected by the age of the patient, cause of infertility, number of embryos transferred and the average morphology score, as revealed by multiple logistic regression analysis. , 1995, Human reproduction.

[2]  David G. Bounds,et al.  A comparison of neural network and other pattern recognition approaches to the diagnosis of low back disorders , 1990, Neural Networks.

[3]  S Mitchell,et al.  Predicting Outcomes After Liver Transplantation A Connectionist Approach , 1994, Annals of surgery.

[4]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks , 1995 .

[5]  G. Serour,et al.  The prognostic value of successful in-vitro fertilization in subsequent trials. , 1994, Human reproduction.

[6]  L. Bastiaans,et al.  A more realistic approach to the cumulative pregnancy rate after in-vitro fertilization. , 1996, Human reproduction.

[7]  W. Baxt,et al.  Prospective validation of artificial neural network trained to identify acute myocardial infarction , 1996, The Lancet.

[8]  D. Conway,et al.  Population study of causes, treatment, and outcome of infertility. , 1985, British medical journal.

[9]  D. Seidman,et al.  Cumulative pregnancy rate following in-vitro fertilization: the significance of age and infertility aetiology. , 1996, Human reproduction.

[10]  Brian D. Ripley,et al.  Neural Networks and Related Methods for Classification , 1994 .

[11]  M. Seibel,et al.  Parameters that predict success for natural cycle in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. , 1995, Fertility and sterility.

[12]  Heekuck Oh,et al.  Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition , 1993, Adv. Comput..

[13]  A. Shennan,et al.  Blood pressure changes during labour and whilst ambulating with combined spinal epidural analgesia , 1995, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[14]  R. Legro,et al.  Altered responses to stress in women undergoing in-vitro fertilization and recipients of oocyte donation. , 1995, Human reproduction.

[15]  J. Boivin,et al.  Stress level across stages of in vitro fertilization in subsequently pregnant and nonpregnant women. , 1995, Fertility and sterility.