Electrical conductivity and piezoresistive response of 3D printed thermoplastic polyurethane/multiwalled carbon nanotube composites

Additive manufacturing (AM) is an emerging field experiencing rapid growth. This paper presents a feasibility study of using fused-deposition modeling (FDM) techniques with smart materials to fabricate objects with sensing and actuating capabilities. The fabrication of objects with sensing typically requires the integration and assembly of multiple components. Incorporating sensing elements into a single FDM process has the potential to significantly simplify manufacturing. The integration of multiple materials, especially smart materials and those with multi-functional properties, into the FDM process is challenging and still requires further development. Previous works by the authors have demonstrated a good printability of thermoplastic polyurethane/multiwall carbon nanotubes (TPU/MWCNT) while maintaining conductivity and piezoresistive response. This research explores the effects of layer height, nozzle temperature, and bed temperature on the electrical conductivity and piezoresistive response of printed TPU/MWCNT nanocomposites. An impedance analyzer was used to determine the conductivity of printed samples under different printing conditions from 5Hz-13MHz. The samples were then tested under compression loads to measure the piezoresistive response. Results show the conductivity and piezoresistive response are only slightly affected by the print parameters and they can be largely considered independent of the print conditions within the examined ranges of print parameters. This behavior simplifies the printing process design for TPU/MWCNT complex structures. This work demonstrates the possibility of manufacturing embedded and multidirectional flexible strain sensors using an inexpensive and versatile method, with potential applications in soft robotics, flexible electronics, and health monitoring.

[1]  Zuowan Zhou,et al.  Carbon nanotube network structure induced strain sensitivity and shape memory behavior changes of thermoplastic polyurethane , 2015 .

[2]  Yiu-Wing Mai,et al.  Dispersion and alignment of carbon nanotubes in polymer matrix: A review , 2005 .

[3]  Cameron J. Hohimer,et al.  The impact of nozzle and bed temperatures on the fracture resistance of FDM printed materials , 2017, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[4]  X. Tao,et al.  Carbon nanotube-reinforced polyurethane composite fibers , 2006 .

[5]  Changki Mo,et al.  3D printed thermoplastic polyurethane with isotropic material properties , 2017, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[6]  David A. Hutchins,et al.  A Simple, Low-Cost Conductive Composite Material for 3D Printing of Electronic Sensors , 2012, PloS one.

[7]  Siba Sankar Mahapatra,et al.  OPTIMIZATION OF PROCESS PARAMETERS IN FUSED DEPOSITION MODELING USING WEIGHTED PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS , 2011 .

[8]  Nahal Aliheidari,et al.  3D printed highly elastic strain sensors of multiwalled carbon nanotube/thermoplastic polyurethane nanocomposites , 2017 .

[9]  P. Wright,et al.  Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS , 2002 .

[10]  N. Aliheidari,et al.  Fracture resistance measurement of fused deposition modeling 3D printed polymers , 2017 .

[11]  G. Rizvi,et al.  Effect of processing conditions on the bonding quality of FDM polymer filaments , 2008 .

[12]  F. Fruggiero,et al.  State of the art of additive manufacturing: Review for tolerances, mechanical resistance and production costs , 2016 .

[13]  Joshua M. Pearce,et al.  3-D Printing of Open Source Appropriate Technologies for Self-Directed Sustainable Development , 2010, Journal of Sustainable Development.

[14]  A. Pegoretti,et al.  Electrically conductive nanocomposites for fused deposition modelling , 2017 .

[15]  Chul B. Park,et al.  Process-microstructure-electrical conductivity relationships in injection-molded polypropylene/carbon nanotube nanocomposite foams , 2017 .

[16]  Chul B. Park,et al.  Polypropylene/carbon nanotube nano/microcellular structures with high dielectric permittivity, low dielectric loss, and low percolation threshold , 2014 .

[17]  Cameron J. Hohimer,et al.  Mechanical Behavior of 3D Printed Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube/Thermoplastic Polyurethane Nanocomposites , 2017 .

[18]  T. Peijs,et al.  Conductive network formation in the melt of carbon nanotube/thermoplastic polyurethane composite , 2009 .

[19]  S. Timsit,et al.  Electrical contact resistance: properties of stationary interfaces , 1998, Electrical Contacts - 1998. Proceedings of the Forty-Fourth IEEE Holm Conference on Electrical Contacts (Cat. No.98CB36238).

[20]  A. K. Sood,et al.  Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts , 2010 .

[21]  T. Gries,et al.  Extrusion of CNT-modified Polymers with Low Viscosity - Influence of Crystallization and CNT Orientation on the Electrical Properties , 2013 .