The variability of automated QRS duration measurement

Aims Previous studies have demonstrated substantial variability in manual assessment of QRS complex duration (QRSd). Disagreements in QRSd measurements were also found in several automated algorithms tested on digitized electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings. The aim of our study was to investigate the variability of automated QRSd measurements performed by two commercially available electrocardiographs. Methods and Results Two GE MAC 5000 (GE-1 and GE-2) electrocardiographs and two Mortara ELI 350 (Mortara-1 and Mortara-2) electrocardiographs were used in the study. Participants for the study were recruited from patients hospitalized in the department of cardiology of a university hospital. Participants underwent up to four recording sessions within a single day with a different electrocardiograph at each session when two to four immediately successive ECG recordings were undertaken. In 76 patients, 683 ECGs were recorded; the mean QRSd was 109.0 ± 26.1 ms. The QRSd difference ≥10 ms between the first and second intra-session ECG was found in 7, 3, 20, and 14% of ECG pairs for GE-1, GE-2, Mortara-1, and Mortara-2, respectively. No inter-session difference in QRSd was found within both manufacturers. In individual patients, Mortara calculated the mean QRSd to be longer by 7.3 ms (95% CI: 6.2-8.5 ms, P < 0.0001) with a 2.1-times (95% CI: 1.9-2.4) greater standard deviation of the mean QRSd (7.1 vs. 3.3 ms, P < 0.001). Conclusion Electrocardiographs from two manufacturers measured QRSd values with a systematic difference and a significantly different level of precision. This may have important clinical implications in selection of suitable candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

[1]  J. Daubert,et al.  The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  John L Sapp,et al.  Cardiac-resynchronization therapy for mild-to-moderate heart failure. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  B. Sarubbi,et al.  QRS width in right bundle branch block. Accuracy and reproducibility of manual measurement. , 2000, International journal of cardiology.

[4]  M. Link,et al.  2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update of the 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2012, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[5]  M Demeester,et al.  Assessment of the performance of electrocardiographic computer programs with the use of a reference data base. , 1985, Circulation.

[6]  P. Diggle,et al.  Analysis of Longitudinal Data. , 1997 .

[7]  E. W. Hancock,et al.  Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part I: the electrocardiogram and its technology a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Card , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  P. Diggle,et al.  Analysis of Longitudinal Data , 2003 .

[9]  M. Haissaguerre,et al.  Reliability and Reproducibility of QRS Duration in the Selection of Candidates for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[10]  E. W. Hancock,et al.  Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram. Part I: The electrocardiogram and its technology. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Car , 2007, Heart rhythm.

[11]  Katerina Hnatkova,et al.  Subject-specific heart rate dependency of electrocardiographic QT, PQ, and QRS intervals. , 2008, Journal of electrocardiology.

[12]  Wojciech Zareba,et al.  Cardiac-resynchronization therapy for the prevention of heart-failure events. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  M. Gold,et al.  Cardiac Resynchronization Induces Major Structural and Functional Reverse Remodeling in Patients With New York Heart Association Class I/II Heart Failure , 2009, Circulation.

[14]  P. Macfarlane,et al.  Comparison of automated measurements of electrocardiographic intervals and durations by computer-based algorithms of digital electrocardiographs. , 2014, American heart journal.

[15]  Lluís Mont,et al.  2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). , 2013, European heart journal.

[16]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[17]  E. W. Hancock,et al.  AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part III: intraventricular conduction disturbances: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  T. Betts,et al.  Accuracy of manual QRS duration assessment: its importance in patient selection for cardiac resynchronization and implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy. , 2009, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.