A skin sensitization safety assessment of a new bleach activator technology in detergent applications

A new chemical called nonanoyl amido caproylacid oxybenzenesulphonate (NACAOBS) is being developed for use as a bleach activator in laundry detergents. Bleach activators, like NACAOBS, are typically used at levels between 2% and 6% in laundry detergents. NACAOBS is stable in aqueous solutions, but undergoes rapid perhydrolysis when combined with water and peroxygen bleach in laundry detergents. Animal testing demonstrated that NACAOBS, as a raw material, is a weak skin sensitizer. Clinical testing, including extended simulated laundry pretreatment, human repeat insult patch testing and home use testing was then undertaken, following sufficient reassurance of 1) the weak sensitization potential of the substance, 2) its rapid degradation in laundry wash solutions and, consequently, 3) low‐to‐negligible consumer dermal exposures to the native substance. Results confirmed the skin sensitization safety profile of laundry detergents containing NACAOBS, namely the absence of any reaction suggestive of contact sensitization (even under exaggerated dermal exposure conditions in a detergent matrix), and a skin compatibility profile comparable to that of current detergents. Further confirmation of the skin safety profile was obtained from a successful 12‐month market test of a granular detergent containing 3.6% of the new substance, during which not a single adverse skin reaction was reported. In addition, NOBS (an oxybenzenesulphonate structural analogue to NACAOBS) has similar toxicological properties and has been safely marketed in detergents at similar levels for many years. It can be concluded that the likelihood of NACAOBS to induce skin sensitization or even elicit allergic reactions in consumer detergent use scenarios is negligible.

[1]  I Kimber,et al.  Local lymph node assay: validation assessment for regulatory purposes. , 2000, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

[2]  D A Basketter,et al.  An expert system rulebase for identifying contact allergens. , 1994, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[3]  G F Gerberick,et al.  A skin sensitization risk assessment approach for evaluation of new ingredients and products. , 2000, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

[4]  I Kimber,et al.  Contact allergenic potency: correlation of human and local lymph node assay data. , 2001, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

[5]  K. Andolsek,et al.  Risk assessment , 2003, Nature.

[6]  G F Gerberick,et al.  An interlaboratory evaluation of the Buehler test for the identification and classification of skin sensitizers , 1996, Contact dermatitis.

[7]  I. Kimber,et al.  Use of the local lymph node assay for the estimation of relative contact allergenic potency , 2000, Contact dermatitis.

[8]  J Hilton,et al.  The murine local lymph node assay. , 1995, Methods in molecular biology.

[9]  M K Robinson,et al.  A risk assessment process for allergic contact sensitization. , 1989, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[10]  M K Robinson,et al.  A review of the Buehler guinea pig skin sensitization test and its use in a risk assessment process for human skin sensitization. , 1990, Toxicology.

[11]  D. Basketter,et al.  Influence of application vehicle on skin sensitization to methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone: an analysis using the local lymph node assay , 1999, Contact dermatitis.

[12]  D. Basketter,et al.  The impact of vehicle on assessment of relative skin sensitization potency of 1,4-dihydroquinone in the local lymph node assay. , 1999, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

[13]  I Kimber,et al.  The local lymph node assay: a viable alternative to currently accepted skin sensitization tests. , 1996, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[14]  M. Barratt,et al.  Development of an expert system rulebase for identifying contact allergens. , 1994, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[15]  I Kimber,et al.  Skin sensitisation, vehicle effects and the local lymph node assay. , 2001, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[16]  I Kimber,et al.  Skin sensitization testing in potency and risk assessment. , 2001, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[17]  D. Basketter REVIEW Skin sensitization: risk assessment , 1998, International journal of cosmetic science.

[18]  G F Gerberick,et al.  The importance of exposure estimation in the assessment of skin sensitization risk , 2000, Contact dermatitis.

[19]  M. C. Newman,et al.  The practice of structure activity relationships (SAR) in toxicology. , 2000, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.