Learning As It Happens: A Decade of Analyzing and Shaping a Large-Scale Online Learning System

With the advent of computers in education, and the ample availability of online learning and practice environments, enormous amounts of data on learning become available. The purpose of this paper is to present a decade of experience with analyzing and improving an online practice environment for math, which has thus far recorded over a billion responses. We present the methods we use to both steer and analyze this system in real-time, using scoring rules on accuracy and response times, a tailored rating system to provide both learners and items with current ability and difficulty ratings, and an adaptive engine that matches learners to items. Moreover, we explore the quality of fit by means of prediction accuracy and parallel item reliability. Limitations and pitfalls are discussed by diagnosing sources of misfit, like violations of unidimensionality and unforeseen dynamics. Finally, directions for development are discussed, including embedded learning analytics and a focus on online experimentation to evaluate both the system itself and the users’ learning gains. Though many challenges remain open, we believe that large steps have been made in providing methods to efficiently manage and research educational big data from a massive online learning system.

[1]  Han L J van der Maas,et al.  Navigating Massive Open Online Courses. , 2015, Science.

[2]  Radek Pelánek,et al.  Application of Time Decay Functions and the Elo System in Student Modeling , 2014, EDM.

[3]  Gunter Maris,et al.  Filtering Data for Detecting Differential Development , 2015 .

[4]  Abe D. Hofman,et al.  The Balance-Scale Task Revisited: A Comparison of Statistical Models for Rule-Based and Information-Integration Theories of Proportional Reasoning , 2015, PloS one.

[5]  S. Klinkenberg High Speed High Stakes Scoring Rule - Assessing the Performance of a New Scoring Rule for Digital Assessment , 2014, CAA.

[6]  L. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[7]  Cornelis A.W. Glas,et al.  Computerized adaptive testing : theory and practice , 2000 .

[8]  G. Maris,et al.  Speed-Accuracy Response Models: Scoring Rules based on Response Time and Accuracy , 2012 .

[9]  Radek Pelánek,et al.  Student Models for Prior Knowledge Estimation , 2015, EDM.

[10]  Kurt VanLehn,et al.  Repair Theory: A Generative Theory of Bugs in Procedural Skills , 1980, Cogn. Sci..

[11]  A. Elo The rating of chessplayers, past and present , 1978 .

[12]  R. Siegler Three aspects of cognitive development , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  Abe D. Hofman,et al.  Tracing the Development of Typewriting Skills in an Adaptive E-Learning Environment , 2015, Perceptual and motor skills.

[14]  M. R. Novick,et al.  Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. , 1971 .

[15]  Mark H. Ashcraft,et al.  The development of mental arithmetic: A chronometric approach☆ , 1982 .

[16]  Paul De Boeck,et al.  Can fast and slow intelligence be differentiated , 2012 .

[17]  S. Klinkenberg,et al.  Computer adaptive practice of Maths ability using a new item response model for on the fly ability and difficulty estimation , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[18]  R. Hambleton,et al.  Fundamentals of Item Response Theory , 1991 .

[19]  Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al.  Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics , 1977 .

[20]  Matthieu J. S. Brinkhuis,et al.  Tracking educational progress , 2014 .

[21]  Abe D. Hofman,et al.  Distinguishing Fast and Slow Processes in Accuracy - Response Time Data , 2016, PloS one.

[22]  Bernard P. Veldkamp,et al.  Computerized adaptive testing in computer assisted learning , 2011 .

[23]  M. Glickman Parameter Estimation in Large Dynamic Paired Comparison Experiments , 1999 .

[24]  Wim van den Noortgate,et al.  Adaptive item-based learning environments based on the item response theory: possibilities and challenges , 2010, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[25]  Mark E. Glickman,et al.  Dynamic paired comparison models with stochastic variances , 2001 .

[26]  D. Hunter,et al.  mixtools: An R Package for Analyzing Mixture Models , 2009 .

[27]  Radek Pelánek,et al.  Elo-based learner modeling for the adaptive practice of facts , 2017, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[28]  Howard Wainer,et al.  Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Primer , 2000 .

[29]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[30]  H. Wainer Computerized adaptive testing: A primer, 2nd ed. , 2000 .

[31]  Chun Wang,et al.  A mixture hierarchical model for response times and response accuracy. , 2015, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[32]  Abe D. Hofman,et al.  Fast and slow strategies in multiplication , 2018, Learning and Individual Differences.

[33]  William H. Batchelder,et al.  The statistical analysis of a thurstonian model for rating chess players , 1979 .

[34]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Growth of Logical Thinking , 1959 .

[35]  Georg Rasch,et al.  Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests , 1981, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[36]  Caspar M. Groeneveld Implementation of an Adaptive Training and Tracking Game in Statistics Teaching , 2014, CAA.

[37]  P. Molenaar A Manifesto on Psychology as Idiographic Science: Bringing the Person Back Into Scientific Psychology, This Time Forever , 2004 .

[38]  Han L. J. van der Maas,et al.  Delaying access to a problem-skipping option increases effortful practice: Application of an A/B test in large-scale online learning , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[39]  M. Straatemeier,et al.  Learning multiplication: An integrated analysis of the multiplication ability of primary school children and the difficulty of single digit and multidigit multiplication problems , 2015 .

[40]  D. Lazer,et al.  The Parable of Google Flu: Traps in Big Data Analysis , 2014, Science.

[41]  William H. Batchelder,et al.  Dynamic paired-comparison scaling , 1992 .

[42]  Brenda R. J. Jansen,et al.  The Influence of Experiencing Success in Math on Math Anxiety, Perceived Math Competence, and Math Performance. , 2013 .