Investigating How Design Concepts Evolve in Engineering Students

A critical aspect to engineering practice is the ability to design solutions to ill-structured problems. Prior research has shown that such solutions are highly effective when they are evaluated in relation to multiple design concepts. However, prior research has also shown that engineering students tend to fixate on their initial design ideas rather than base their solutions on the integration of many diverse concepts. One recently developed method to overcome the problems of fixation is 77 Design Heuristics. This method for generating design concepts comes in the form of 77 cards, each with a different cognitive prompt for generating a solution (e.g., reduce material, flatten). By using the cards, engineers and engineering students are able to expand their horizons of possible solutions to challenging design problems. Using a first-year engineering course, we integrated the 77 Design Heuristics cards to document how these students develop final concepts in relation to their initial ideas. We analyzed 12 firstyear engineering students, distributed across 3 different design teams. Our findings demonstrate key influences that did foster idea fluency (Theme 1: Influence of 77 Cards on Early Design Concepts) but also ways that students remained attached to particular concepts throughout their design process (Theme 2: Resilient Concepts after Concept Generation).

[1]  Avigail Sachs,et al.  `Stuckness' in the design studio , 1999 .

[2]  Shanna R. Daly,et al.  Design Heuristics in Engineering Concept Generation , 2012 .

[3]  F. Zwicky Discovery, Invention, Research through the morphological approach , 1969 .

[4]  Seda Yilmaz,et al.  Cognitive Heuristics Employed by Design Experts A Case Study , 2009 .

[5]  Ann F. McKenna,et al.  Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field , 2010 .

[6]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  Towards an ‘ideal’ approach for concept generation , 2003 .

[7]  Gerald F. Smith Idea‐Generation Techniques: A Formulary of Active Ingredients , 1998 .

[8]  Ian Dennis,et al.  Cognitive processes in engineering design: a longitudinal study , 1994 .

[9]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[10]  Colleen M. Seifert,et al.  Creativity through design heuristics: A case study of expert product design , 2011 .

[11]  Seda Yilmaz,et al.  Teaching Design Ideation , 2011 .

[12]  William C. Oakes,et al.  Making Sense of Design: A Thematic Analysis of Alumni Perspectives , 2013 .

[13]  J. Cusack Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications , 1994 .

[14]  Robin Adams,et al.  The Informed Design Teaching and Learning Matrix , 2012 .

[15]  Seda Yilmaz,et al.  Cognitive Heuristic Use In Engineering Design Ideation , 2010 .

[16]  Horst Geschka,et al.  Modern Techniques for Solving Problems , 1976 .

[17]  James J. Duderstadt,et al.  Engineering for a Changing World - A Roadmap to the Future of Engineering Practice, Research, and Education (Flexner) , 2008 .

[18]  G. S. Alʹtshuller,et al.  40 Principles: TRIZ Keys to Technical Innovation , 1998 .

[19]  David N. Perkins,et al.  Creativity's camel: The role of analogy in invention. , 1997 .

[20]  Dennis R. Brophy Comparing the Attributes, Activities, and Performance of Divergent, Convergent, and Combination Thinkers , 2001 .

[21]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Design cognition: results from protocol and other empirical studies of design activity , 2016 .

[22]  Johnny Saldaña,et al.  The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers , 2009 .

[23]  John S. Gero,et al.  Design and other types of fixation , 1996 .

[24]  Philip Samuel,et al.  Six Thinking Hats , 1988 .

[25]  G. Altshuller Creativity as an exact science : the theory of the solution of inventive problems , 1984 .

[26]  William C. Oakes,et al.  Preparing Engineers for the Workplace through Service Learning: Perceptions of EPICS Alumni , 2016 .

[27]  Cynthia J. Atman,et al.  A comparison of freshman and senior engineering design processes , 1999 .

[28]  A. Osborn Applied imagination : principles and procedures of creative problem-solving , 1957 .

[29]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  A model of the mechanical design process based on empirical data , 1988, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[30]  Colleen M. Seifert,et al.  COGNITIVE HEURISTICS IN DESIGN IDEATION , 2010 .

[31]  Seda Yilmaz,et al.  Expanding evidence-based pedagogy with Design Heuristics , 2015 .

[32]  Seda Yilmaz,et al.  Assessing Design Heuristics for Idea Generation in an Introductory Engineering Course , 2012 .

[33]  Seda Yilmaz,et al.  A Comparison of Cognitive Heuristics Use between Engineers and Industrial Designers , 2010, DCC.

[34]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  A Study of Design Fixation, Its Mitigation and Perception in Engineering Design Faculty , 2010 .