Documentation errors in instrumentation and electrical systems: Toward productivity improvement using System Information Modeling

Documentation errors have been identified as a significant problem within the construction and engineering industry. Errors contained with contract documents can contribute to loss of profit, reduced productivity, and cost and time overruns as well as contractual disputes. Research has identified that as much as 60% of variations in construction and engineering projects are a result of errors and omissions contained within poor quality documentation. Considering this alarming statistic and the impact that poor quality documentation can have on productivity, the research presented in this paper classifies and quantifies errors in 106 drawings and the cable schedule used to document for the electrical package for an Iron Ore Stacker Conveyor. The research reveals that Computer Aided Design (CAD) used to produce the electrical drawings was ineffective, inefficient and costly to produce as they contained an array of errors. In addressing the need to eliminate documentation errors and improve productivity, the cable schedule is used to create a Systems Information Management to develop a 1:1 object orientated model using the software Dynamic Asset Documentation. As a result, of using this approach it is estimated that a 94% cost saving and a substantial improvement in productivity could have been attained in this particular case.

[1]  Viviane M. J. Robinson,et al.  The Origins and Status of Action Research , 1984 .

[2]  Awad S. Hanna,et al.  Best Practices from WisDOT Mega and ARRA Projects - Request for Information: Benchmarks and Metrics , 2012 .

[3]  Laura Smith,et al.  Between idealism and reality: Meeting the challenges of participatory action research , 2010 .

[4]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Exchanging Preliminary Information in Concurrent Engineering: Alternative Coordination Strategies , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[5]  H. Abdul-Rahman.  Some observations on the issues of quality cost in construction , 1997 .

[6]  Karl-Olof Nylén,et al.  Cost of failure in a major civil engineering project , 1996 .

[7]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Causal Discovery and Inference of Project Disputes , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[8]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Determinants of rework in building construction projects , 2004 .

[9]  John F. McGeorge.  DESIGN PRODUCTIVITY: A QUALITY PROBLEM , 1988 .

[10]  Thomas R Black.  Evaluating Social Science Research: An Introduction , 1994 .

[11]  S. Parker.  Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities , 1970 .

[12]  M. Hugentobler,et al.  Conducting Action Research: Relationships between Organization Members and Researchers , 1992 .

[13]  R. M. Eastman.  Engineering information release prior to final design freeze , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[14]  Andi,et al.  Design documents quality in the Japanese construction industry: factors influencing and impacts on construction process , 2003 .

[15]  Peter R. Hibberd.  Variations in construction contracts , 1986 .

[16]  P. Love,et al.  Contract Documentation and the Incidence of Rework in Projects , 2005 .

[17]  Berreksi Youceff.  Implementation of ISO 9001:2000 quality management system for construction biddings procedures in construction management practice , 2006 .

[18]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Rework in Civil Infrastructure Projects: Determination of Cost Predictors , 2010 .

[19]  David J. Edwards,et al.  Forensic Project Management: An Exploratory Examination of the Causal Behavior of Design-Induced Rework , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[20]  G. Susman,et al.  An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. , 1978 .

[21]  Steven J. Taylor,et al.  Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Guidebook and Resource , 2015 .

[22]  Sherif Ali Mohtady Mohamed,et al.  INDICATORS OF DESIGN AND DOCUMENTATION DEFICIENCY , 1997 .

[23]  Rajkumar Roy,et al.  Design Rework Prediction in Concurrent Design Environment: Current Trends and Future Research Directions , 2009 .

[24]  Donald K. Hicks,et al.  Improvements in design review management , 1988 .

[25]  Arthur A. Defraites.  Fee versus Quality , 1989 .

[26]  Robert Lopez,et al.  Research Report Causal Ascription of Disputes in Construction Projects , 2008 .

[27]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Design Error Costs in Construction Projects , 2012 .

[28]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Determining the probability distribution of rework costs in construction and engineering projects , 2013 .

[29]  Colin Robson,et al.  Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers , 1993 .

[30]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[31]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  A Model-Based Framework to Overlap Product Development Activities , 1997 .

[32]  Paul C. Stern,et al.  Evaluating Social Science Research , 1979 .

[33]  Paul A. Tilley.  Lean Design Management: A New Paradigm for Managing the Design and Documentation Process to Improve Quality? , 2005 .

[34]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Concurrent Engineering in the Construction Industry , 1997 .

[35]  N. Denzin.  The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods , 1977 .

[36]  Paul A. Tilley,et al.  Design and documentation quality survey : comparison of designers' and contractors' perspectives. (A survey investigating changes in design and documentation quality within the Australian construction industry and its effect on construction process efficiency) , 2000 .

[37]  Steve Rowlinson,et al.  A Definition of Procurement Systems , 1998 .

[38]  W. B. Ledbetter,et al.  MEASURING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION QUALITY COSTS , 1989 .

[39]  John Gardiner.  Management of Design Documentation Where Do We Go from Here , 1994 .

[40]  Richard L. Baskerville,et al.  Distinguishing action research from participative case studies , 1997 .