Quality of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Plans Using a ⁶⁰Co Magnetic Resonance Image Guidance Radiation Therapy System.

PURPOSE This work describes a commercial treatment planning system, its technical features, and its capabilities for creating (60)Co intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment plans for a magnetic resonance image guidance radiation therapy (MR-IGRT) system. METHODS AND MATERIALS The ViewRay treatment planning system (Oakwood Village, OH) was used to create (60)Co IMRT treatment plans for 33 cancer patients with disease in the abdominal, pelvic, thorax, and head and neck regions using physician-specified patient-specific target coverage and organ at risk (OAR) objectives. Backup plans using a third-party linear accelerator (linac)-based planning system were also created. Plans were evaluated by attending physicians and approved for treatment. The (60)Co and linac plans were compared by evaluating conformity numbers (CN) with 100% and 95% of prescription reference doses and heterogeneity indices (HI) for planning target volumes (PTVs) and maximum, mean, and dose-volume histogram (DVH) values for OARs. RESULTS All (60)Co IMRT plans achieved PTV coverage and OAR sparing that were similar to linac plans. PTV conformity for (60)Co was within <1% and 3% of linac plans for 100% and 95% prescription reference isodoses, respectively, and heterogeneity was on average 4% greater. Comparisons of OAR mean dose showed generally better sparing with linac plans in the low-dose range <20 Gy, but comparable sparing for organs with mean doses >20 Gy. The mean doses for all (60)Co plan OARs were within clinical tolerances. CONCLUSIONS A commercial (60)Co MR-IGRT device can produce highly conformal IMRT treatment plans similar in quality to linac IMRT for a variety of disease sites. Additional work is in progress to evaluate the clinical benefit of other novel features of this MR-IGRT system.

[1]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Effectiveness of noncoplanar IMRT planning using a parallelized multiresolution beam angle optimization method for paranasal sinus carcinoma. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  C. Reddy,et al.  Prediction of chest wall toxicity from lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  Sunita Ghosh,et al.  A treatment planning study comparing helical tomotherapy with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for the treatment of anal cancer. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[4]  M. Moerland,et al.  A conformation number to quantify the degree of conformality in brachytherapy and external beam irradiation: application to the prostate. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  Tomas Kron,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging for adaptive cobalt tomotherapy: A proposal , 2006, Journal of medical physics.

[6]  Georges Noël,et al.  Conformity index: a review. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  J. R. Palta,et al.  WE-E-ValA-06: A Real-Time MRI Guided External Beam Radiotherapy Delivery System , 2006 .

[8]  S. Marnitz,et al.  Helical tomotherapy versus conventional intensity-modulated radiation therapy for primary chemoradiation in cervical cancer patients: an intraindividual comparison. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  B W Raaymakers,et al.  Magnetic-field-induced dose effects in MR-guided radiotherapy systems: dependence on the magnetic field strength , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  E. Adams,et al.  A comparison between cobalt and linear accelerator-based treatment plans for conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy. , 2008, The British journal of radiology.

[11]  H. Romeijn,et al.  Comparative analysis of 60Co intensity-modulated radiation therapy. , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  B W Raaymakers,et al.  Integrating a MRI scanner with a 6 MV radiotherapy accelerator: dose increase at tissue–air interfaces in a lateral magnetic field due to returning electrons , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  H. Romeijn,et al.  Comparative analysis of 60Co intensity-modulated radiation therapy , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Cedric X. Yu,et al.  Helical tomotherapy versus single-arc intensity-modulated arc therapy: a collaborative dosimetric comparison between two institutions. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  Shuichi Ozawa,et al.  A dose comparison study between XVI and OBI CBCT systems. , 2008, Medical physics.

[16]  J. Leyden,et al.  LOCALIZED ACNEIFORM ERUPTION FOLLOWING COBALT IRRADIATION , 1972, The British journal of dermatology.

[17]  Sasa Mutic,et al.  The ViewRay system: magnetic resonance-guided and controlled radiotherapy. , 2014, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[18]  P. Cadman,et al.  Co-60 tomotherapy: a treatment planning investigation. , 2011, Medical physics.

[19]  L. Schreiner,et al.  Practical and clinical considerations in Cobalt-60 tomotherapy , 2009, Journal of medical physics.