Challenges and strategies of matrix effects using chromatography-mass spectrometry: An overview from research versus regulatory viewpoints
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Krska,et al. Evaluation of Matrix Effects and Extraction Efficiencies of LC–MS/MS Methods as the Essential Part for Proper Validation of Multiclass Contaminants in Complex Feed , 2020, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.
[2] B. Matuszewski. Standard line slopes as a measure of a relative matrix effect in quantitative HPLC-MS bioanalysis. , 2006, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.
[3] D. Barceló,et al. Analytical quality assurance in veterinary drug residue analysis methods: matrix effects determination and monitoring for sulfonamides analysis. , 2015, Talanta.
[4] B. Łozowicka,et al. Compensation of matrix effects in seed matrices followed by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis of pesticide residues. , 2019, Journal of chromatography. A.
[5] H. Rosing,et al. Stable isotopically labeled internal standards in quantitative bioanalysis using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry: necessity or not? , 2005, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.
[6] T. Olah,et al. The effects of sample preparation methods on the variability of the electrospray ionization response for model drug compounds. , 1999, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.
[7] A. Fernández-Alba,et al. Development and validation of a LC–MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of aflatoxins, dyes and pesticides in spices , 2010, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.
[8] D. Stein,et al. Evaluation of matrix effect and chromatography efficiency: new parameters for validation of method development , 2005, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.
[9] Michael Thompson,et al. Standard additions: myth and reality. , 2008, The Analyst.
[10] H. Aboul‐Enein,et al. Reduction of matrix effects through a simplified QuEChERS method and using small injection volumes in a LC-MS/MS system for the determination of 28 pesticides in fruits and vegetables , 2016 .
[11] Rudolf Krska,et al. Optimization and validation of a quantitative liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric method covering 295 bacterial and fungal metabolites including all regulated mycotoxins in four model food matrices. , 2014, Journal of chromatography. A.
[12] W. Lambert,et al. Matrix effect in bio-analysis of illicit drugs with LC-MS/MS: Influence of ionization type, sample preparation, and biofluid , 2003, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.
[13] Achille Cappiello,et al. Overcoming matrix effects in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. , 2008, Analytical chemistry.
[14] Francisco Raposo,et al. Performance parameters for analytical method validation: Controversies and discrepancies among numerous guidelines , 2020, TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry.
[15] S. Lehotay,et al. Combination of analyte protectants to overcome matrix effects in routine GC analysis of pesticide residues in food matrixes. , 2005, Analytical chemistry.
[16] C. Mallet,et al. A study of ion suppression effects in electrospray ionization from mobile phase additives and solid-phase extracts. , 2004, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.
[17] Ivo Leito,et al. Comparison of different methods aiming to account for/overcome matrix effects in LC/ESI/MS on the example of pesticide analyses , 2013 .
[18] Thorsten Reemtsma,et al. Evaluation of three calibration methods to compensate matrix effects in environmental analysis with LC-ESI-MS , 2004, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.
[19] A. Fernández-Alba,et al. Overcoming matrix effects using the dilution approach in multiresidue methods for fruits and vegetables. , 2011, Journal of chromatography. A.
[20] S. Kollipara,et al. International Guidelines for Bioanalytical Method Validation: A Comparison and Discussion on Current Scenario , 2011 .
[21] P. Adamowicz,et al. Simple approach for evaluation of matrix effect in the mass spectrometry of synthetic cannabinoids , 2016, Journal of Analytical Chemistry.
[22] Dana Boyd Barr,et al. Biological Matrix Effects in Quantitative Tandem Mass Spectrometry-Based Analytical Methods: Advancing Biomonitoring , 2016, Critical reviews in analytical chemistry.
[23] D L Buhrman,et al. Quantitation of SR 27417 in human plasma using electrospray liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: A study of ion suppression , 1996, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.
[24] Michael Thompson,et al. Harmonized guidelines for single-laboratory validation of methods of analysis (IUPAC Technical Report) , 2002 .
[25] C. Poole,et al. Matrix-induced response enhancement in pesticide residue analysis by gas chromatography. , 2007, Journal of chromatography. A.
[26] Achille Cappiello,et al. An overview of matrix effects in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. , 2011, Mass spectrometry reviews.
[27] Francisco Raposo,et al. Evaluation of analytical calibration based on least-squares linear regression for instrumental techniques: A tutorial review , 2016 .
[28] Willy Lambert,et al. Countering matrix effects in environmental liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry water analysis for endocrine disrupting chemicals. , 2004, Journal of chromatography. A.
[29] L. Alder,et al. Reduction of matrix effects in liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry by dilution of the sample extracts: how much dilution is needed? , 2012, Analytical chemistry.
[30] Sherry Wang,et al. Does a stable isotopically labeled internal standard always correct analyte response? A matrix effect study on a LC/MS/MS method for the determination of carvedilol enantiomers in human plasma. , 2007, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.
[31] A. M. Gillespie,et al. Explanation of the matrix-induced chromatographic response enhancement of organophosphorus pesticides during open tubular column gas chromatography with splitless or hot on-column injection and flame photometric detection , 1993 .
[32] Yong Huang,et al. Matrix effect and recovery terminology issues in regulated drug bioanalysis. , 2012, Bioanalysis.
[33] B. Matuszewski,et al. Strategies for the assessment of matrix effect in quantitative bioanalytical methods based on HPLC-MS/MS. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.
[34] Cornelius Rimayi,et al. Alternative calibration techniques for counteracting the matrix effects in GC-MS-SPE pesticide residue analysis - a statistical approach. , 2015, Chemosphere.
[35] Vinod P. Shah,et al. Workshop/conference report—Quantitative bioanalytical methods validation and implementation: Best practices for chromatographic and ligand binding assays , 2007, The AAPS Journal.
[36] W. Price,et al. Using calibration approaches to compensate for remaining matrix effects in quantitative liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization multistage mass spectrometric analysis of phytoestrogens in aqueous environmental samples. , 2007, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.
[37] M Hjelm,et al. Nomenclature for automated and mechanised analysis (Recommendations 1989) , 1989, European journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry : journal of the Forum of European Clinical Chemistry Societies.
[38] Erin Chambers,et al. Systematic and comprehensive strategy for reducing matrix effects in LC/MS/MS analyses. , 2007, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.
[39] Y. Michotte,et al. Validation of bioanalytical LC-MS/MS assays: evaluation of matrix effects. , 2009, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.
[40] J. Antignac,et al. The ion suppression phenomenon in liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry and its consequences in the field of residue analysis , 2005 .
[41] P. Kebarle,et al. From ions in solution to ions in the gas phase - the mechanism of electrospray mass spectrometry , 1993 .
[42] Vinod P. Shah,et al. Bioanalytical Method Validation—A Revisit with a Decade of Progress , 2000, Pharmaceutical Research.
[43] W. Niessen,et al. Matrix effects in quantitative pesticide analysis using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. , 2006, Mass spectrometry reviews.
[44] M. Rashid,et al. Comparative assessment of bioanalytical method validation guidelines for pharmaceutical industry. , 2016, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.
[45] M. I. Maguregui,et al. Bioanalytical chromatographic method validation according to current regulations, with a special focus on the non-well defined parameters limit of quantification, robustness and matrix effect. , 2014, Journal of chromatography. A.
[46] Dieter Zimmer,et al. Matrix effects during analysis of plasma samples by electrospray and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry: practical approaches to their elimination. , 2003, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.
[47] P. N. Shaw,et al. Standard addition with internal standardisation as an alternative to using stable isotope labelled internal standards to correct for matrix effects-Comparison and validation using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric assay of vitamin D. , 2018, Journal of chromatography. A.
[48] S. Lehotay,et al. Variability of matrix effects in liquid and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of pesticide residues after QuEChERS sample preparation of different food crops. , 2012, Journal of chromatography. A.
[49] Steven J Lehotay,et al. Fast and easy multiresidue method employing acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and "dispersive solid-phase extraction" for the determination of pesticide residues in produce. , 2003, Journal of AOAC International.