Challenges and strategies of matrix effects using chromatography-mass spectrometry: An overview from research versus regulatory viewpoints

Abstract Matrix components of a sample can affect the quantitative measurement of the target analytes. This singularity is named “matrix effects” and should be considered for method validation procedure. Two main strategies to overcome matrix effects were suggested in the scientific literature: reducing the presence of components responsible for the effects and compensating the influence of matrix effects in the calibration methodology. It has been recommended that the best option to surpass matrix effects at research level is to establish a systematic optimization by the combination of approaches. On the other hand, from the method validation regulatory viewpoint, the information contained in the different method validation guidelines about matrix effects was uncommon. In fact, only in 54% of the evaluated regulatory documents the term matrix effects was mentioned explicitly in their contents. In addition, in the rest of the guidance documents addressing matrix effects, the subject was typically considered only superficially.

[1]  R. Krska,et al.  Evaluation of Matrix Effects and Extraction Efficiencies of LC–MS/MS Methods as the Essential Part for Proper Validation of Multiclass Contaminants in Complex Feed , 2020, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[2]  B. Matuszewski Standard line slopes as a measure of a relative matrix effect in quantitative HPLC-MS bioanalysis. , 2006, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[3]  D. Barceló,et al.  Analytical quality assurance in veterinary drug residue analysis methods: matrix effects determination and monitoring for sulfonamides analysis. , 2015, Talanta.

[4]  B. Łozowicka,et al.  Compensation of matrix effects in seed matrices followed by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis of pesticide residues. , 2019, Journal of chromatography. A.

[5]  H. Rosing,et al.  Stable isotopically labeled internal standards in quantitative bioanalysis using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry: necessity or not? , 2005, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[6]  T. Olah,et al.  The effects of sample preparation methods on the variability of the electrospray ionization response for model drug compounds. , 1999, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[7]  A. Fernández-Alba,et al.  Development and validation of a LC–MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of aflatoxins, dyes and pesticides in spices , 2010, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[8]  D. Stein,et al.  Evaluation of matrix effect and chromatography efficiency: new parameters for validation of method development , 2005, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[9]  Michael Thompson,et al.  Standard additions: myth and reality. , 2008, The Analyst.

[10]  H. Aboul‐Enein,et al.  Reduction of matrix effects through a simplified QuEChERS method and using small injection volumes in a LC-MS/MS system for the determination of 28 pesticides in fruits and vegetables , 2016 .

[11]  Rudolf Krska,et al.  Optimization and validation of a quantitative liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric method covering 295 bacterial and fungal metabolites including all regulated mycotoxins in four model food matrices. , 2014, Journal of chromatography. A.

[12]  W. Lambert,et al.  Matrix effect in bio-analysis of illicit drugs with LC-MS/MS: Influence of ionization type, sample preparation, and biofluid , 2003, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[13]  Achille Cappiello,et al.  Overcoming matrix effects in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. , 2008, Analytical chemistry.

[14]  Francisco Raposo,et al.  Performance parameters for analytical method validation: Controversies and discrepancies among numerous guidelines , 2020, TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry.

[15]  S. Lehotay,et al.  Combination of analyte protectants to overcome matrix effects in routine GC analysis of pesticide residues in food matrixes. , 2005, Analytical chemistry.

[16]  C. Mallet,et al.  A study of ion suppression effects in electrospray ionization from mobile phase additives and solid-phase extracts. , 2004, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[17]  Ivo Leito,et al.  Comparison of different methods aiming to account for/overcome matrix effects in LC/ESI/MS on the example of pesticide analyses , 2013 .

[18]  Thorsten Reemtsma,et al.  Evaluation of three calibration methods to compensate matrix effects in environmental analysis with LC-ESI-MS , 2004, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[19]  A. Fernández-Alba,et al.  Overcoming matrix effects using the dilution approach in multiresidue methods for fruits and vegetables. , 2011, Journal of chromatography. A.

[20]  S. Kollipara,et al.  International Guidelines for Bioanalytical Method Validation: A Comparison and Discussion on Current Scenario , 2011 .

[21]  P. Adamowicz,et al.  Simple approach for evaluation of matrix effect in the mass spectrometry of synthetic cannabinoids , 2016, Journal of Analytical Chemistry.

[22]  Dana Boyd Barr,et al.  Biological Matrix Effects in Quantitative Tandem Mass Spectrometry-Based Analytical Methods: Advancing Biomonitoring , 2016, Critical reviews in analytical chemistry.

[23]  D L Buhrman,et al.  Quantitation of SR 27417 in human plasma using electrospray liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: A study of ion suppression , 1996, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[24]  Michael Thompson,et al.  Harmonized guidelines for single-laboratory validation of methods of analysis (IUPAC Technical Report) , 2002 .

[25]  C. Poole,et al.  Matrix-induced response enhancement in pesticide residue analysis by gas chromatography. , 2007, Journal of chromatography. A.

[26]  Achille Cappiello,et al.  An overview of matrix effects in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. , 2011, Mass spectrometry reviews.

[27]  Francisco Raposo,et al.  Evaluation of analytical calibration based on least-squares linear regression for instrumental techniques: A tutorial review , 2016 .

[28]  Willy Lambert,et al.  Countering matrix effects in environmental liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry water analysis for endocrine disrupting chemicals. , 2004, Journal of chromatography. A.

[29]  L. Alder,et al.  Reduction of matrix effects in liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry by dilution of the sample extracts: how much dilution is needed? , 2012, Analytical chemistry.

[30]  Sherry Wang,et al.  Does a stable isotopically labeled internal standard always correct analyte response? A matrix effect study on a LC/MS/MS method for the determination of carvedilol enantiomers in human plasma. , 2007, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[31]  A. M. Gillespie,et al.  Explanation of the matrix-induced chromatographic response enhancement of organophosphorus pesticides during open tubular column gas chromatography with splitless or hot on-column injection and flame photometric detection , 1993 .

[32]  Yong Huang,et al.  Matrix effect and recovery terminology issues in regulated drug bioanalysis. , 2012, Bioanalysis.

[33]  B. Matuszewski,et al.  Strategies for the assessment of matrix effect in quantitative bioanalytical methods based on HPLC-MS/MS. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[34]  Cornelius Rimayi,et al.  Alternative calibration techniques for counteracting the matrix effects in GC-MS-SPE pesticide residue analysis - a statistical approach. , 2015, Chemosphere.

[35]  Vinod P. Shah,et al.  Workshop/conference report—Quantitative bioanalytical methods validation and implementation: Best practices for chromatographic and ligand binding assays , 2007, The AAPS Journal.

[36]  W. Price,et al.  Using calibration approaches to compensate for remaining matrix effects in quantitative liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization multistage mass spectrometric analysis of phytoestrogens in aqueous environmental samples. , 2007, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[37]  M Hjelm,et al.  Nomenclature for automated and mechanised analysis (Recommendations 1989) , 1989, European journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry : journal of the Forum of European Clinical Chemistry Societies.

[38]  Erin Chambers,et al.  Systematic and comprehensive strategy for reducing matrix effects in LC/MS/MS analyses. , 2007, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[39]  Y. Michotte,et al.  Validation of bioanalytical LC-MS/MS assays: evaluation of matrix effects. , 2009, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[40]  J. Antignac,et al.  The ion suppression phenomenon in liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry and its consequences in the field of residue analysis , 2005 .

[41]  P. Kebarle,et al.  From ions in solution to ions in the gas phase - the mechanism of electrospray mass spectrometry , 1993 .

[42]  Vinod P. Shah,et al.  Bioanalytical Method Validation—A Revisit with a Decade of Progress , 2000, Pharmaceutical Research.

[43]  W. Niessen,et al.  Matrix effects in quantitative pesticide analysis using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. , 2006, Mass spectrometry reviews.

[44]  M. Rashid,et al.  Comparative assessment of bioanalytical method validation guidelines for pharmaceutical industry. , 2016, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[45]  M. I. Maguregui,et al.  Bioanalytical chromatographic method validation according to current regulations, with a special focus on the non-well defined parameters limit of quantification, robustness and matrix effect. , 2014, Journal of chromatography. A.

[46]  Dieter Zimmer,et al.  Matrix effects during analysis of plasma samples by electrospray and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry: practical approaches to their elimination. , 2003, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[47]  P. N. Shaw,et al.  Standard addition with internal standardisation as an alternative to using stable isotope labelled internal standards to correct for matrix effects-Comparison and validation using liquid chromatography-​tandem mass spectrometric assay of vitamin D. , 2018, Journal of chromatography. A.

[48]  S. Lehotay,et al.  Variability of matrix effects in liquid and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of pesticide residues after QuEChERS sample preparation of different food crops. , 2012, Journal of chromatography. A.

[49]  Steven J Lehotay,et al.  Fast and easy multiresidue method employing acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and "dispersive solid-phase extraction" for the determination of pesticide residues in produce. , 2003, Journal of AOAC International.