Vegetation changes at oligotrophic grasslands managed for a declining butterfly

A selection of sites occupied by the EU-protected marsh fritillary ( Euphydryas aurinia ) in western Czech Republic were subjected to a vegetation survey 15 years ago and again recently. In the 66 time-replicated 25 m 2 plots from 12 sites, representing the diversity of E. aurinia -occupied oligotrophic grasslands in the Slavko-vský les Protected Landscape Area (and covering a fifth of the currently-occupied Czech sites), we recorded quantitative representation of vascular plants and mosses. We analysed the data using multivariate ordina-tions, asking how the vegetation changed between the surveys, how was it affected by the conservation management applied and how it affected occupancy by the butterfly larval nests; the vegetation patterns were interpreted using Ellenberg’s plant indicator values. Between the two surveys, the overall representation of the larval host plant, Succisa pratensis , did not change; tree and herbs layers (both grasses and forbs) increased and the moss layer decreased. Across surveys, the main driver of vascular plants’ species composition was moisture, followed by soil reaction and nitrogen, whereas in mosses, nitrogen was the main factor. The main change between the surveys was the increase of nitrogen accompanied by decreased light, probably due to increase of competitively strong plants. Butterfly occupancy declined at sites with high soil moisture and increased at sites with higher soil reaction. Mowing of moist nitrogen-rich sites, but not drier nitrogen-poor sites, increased occupancy, illustrating the need for context-dependent interventions. All the evidence thus shows that E. aurinia prefers drier, warmer and less acidic conditions within the generally moist acidic grasslands and that ongoing eutrophication represents a potential problem in the future.

[1]  Samantha K. Bussan Can cattle grazing benefit grassland butterflies? , 2022, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[2]  K. Porter,et al.  Combining modelling, field data and genetic variation to understand the post-reintroduction population genetics of the Marsh Fritillary butterfly (Euphydryas aurinia) , 2021, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[3]  T. Fartmann,et al.  Occurrence of an endangered grassland butterfly is mainly driven by habitat heterogeneity, food availability, and microclimate , 2021, Insect science.

[4]  C. Schulze,et al.  To graze or to mow? The influence of grassland management on grasshoppers (Orthoptera) on a flood protection embankment in the Donau-Auen National Park (Austria) , 2021, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[5]  T. Schmitt,et al.  Gene-flow within a butterfly metapopulation: the marsh fritillary Euphydryas aurinia in western Bohemia (Czech Republic) , 2021, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[6]  Valentin Amrhein,et al.  Negative effects of nitrogen deposition on Swiss butterflies , 2021, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[7]  E. Ruprecht,et al.  Grassland management and land use history shape species composition and diversity in Transylvanian semi‐natural grasslands , 2021 .

[8]  H. Van Dyck,et al.  The decline of butterflies in Europe: Problems, significance, and possible solutions , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  F. Hayes,et al.  Effects of tropospheric ozone and elevated nitrogen input on the temperate grassland forbs Leontodon hispidus and Succisa pratensis , 2020, Global Ecology and Conservation.

[10]  B. Dumont,et al.  How does pasture size alter plant–herbivore interactions among grazing cattle? , 2020, Grass and Forage Science.

[11]  P. Poschlod,et al.  Ellenberg N values of bryophytes in Central Europe* , 2020 .

[12]  J. Paderewski,et al.  Fen grassland vegetation under different land uses (Biebrza National Park, Poland) , 2020 .

[13]  D. Pauly,et al.  The Protected Area Paradox and refugee species: The giant panda and baselines shifted towards conserving species in marginal habitats , 2020, Conservation Science and Practice.

[14]  A. Helden,et al.  Is grazing always the answer to grassland management for arthropod biodiversity? Lessons from a gravel pit restoration project , 2020, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[15]  J. Askling,et al.  Extreme weather affects colonization–extinction dynamics and the persistence of a threatened butterfly , 2020, Journal of Applied Ecology.

[16]  A. Rammig,et al.  Quantifying impacts of the 2018 drought on European ecosystems in comparison to 2003 , 2019, Biogeosciences.

[17]  C. Stevens,et al.  Mowing mitigates the negative impacts of N addition on plant species diversity , 2019, Oecologia.

[18]  T. Hickler,et al.  Biodiversity-rich European grasslands: Ancient, forgotten ecosystems , 2018, Biological Conservation.

[19]  J. Warren,et al.  Microhabitat selection by ovipositing females and pre-diapause larvae of a Welsh population of Euphydryas aurinia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) , 2018, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[20]  Jacqueline Loos,et al.  The challenge of abandonment for the sustainable management of Palaearctic natural and semi-natural grasslands , 2018 .

[21]  Z. Botta‐Dukát,et al.  The effect of abandonment on vegetation composition and soil properties in Molinion meadows (SW Poland) , 2018, PloS one.

[22]  M. Wrzesień,et al.  Conservation status and trends in the transformation of Molinia meadows in the Łąki w Komborni Natura 2000 site, SE Poland , 2017 .

[23]  D. Zelený,et al.  Management of semi-natural grasslands benefiting both plant and insect diversity: The importance of heterogeneity and tradition , 2017 .

[24]  M. WallisDeVries,et al.  Pathways for the effects of increased nitrogen deposition on fauna , 2017 .

[25]  R. Ejrnæs,et al.  The collapse of marsh fritillary (Euphydryas aurinia) populations associated with declining host plant abundance , 2017 .

[26]  M. Malicki,et al.  Ellenberg's indicator values support prediction of suitable habitat for pre-diapause larvae of endangered butterfly Euphydryas aurinia , 2017, PloS one.

[27]  I. Hůnová,et al.  Nitrogen deposition and its impact on forest ecosystems in the Czech Republic - change in soil chemistry and ground vegetation , 2017 .

[28]  M. Weiser,et al.  Surrounding vegetation mediates frequency of plant–herbivore interactions in leaf-feeders but not in other herbivore groups , 2016 .

[29]  P. Poschlod,et al.  Grazing vs. mowing: A meta-analysis of biodiversity benefits for grassland management , 2016 .

[30]  A. Bartoňová,et al.  Cluster biodiversity as a multidimensional structure evolution strategy: checkerspot butterflies of the group Euphydryas aurinia (Rottemburg, 1775) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) , 2016 .

[31]  T. Schmitt,et al.  Three in One—Multiple Faunal Elements within an Endangered European Butterfly Species , 2015, PloS one.

[32]  R. Pakeman,et al.  High‐nature‐value grasslands have the capacity to cope with nutrient impoverishment induced by mowing and livestock grazing , 2015 .

[33]  H. Meister,et al.  Testing for local monophagy in the regionally oligophagous Euphydryas aurinia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) , 2015, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[34]  T. Merckx,et al.  Reshaping agri-environmental subsidies: From marginal farming to large-scale rewilding , 2015 .

[35]  S. Nilsson,et al.  Land-use changes, farm management and the decline of butterflies associated with semi-natural grasslands in southern Sweden , 2013 .

[36]  C. Stevens,et al.  Impact of nitrogen deposition at the species level , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  J. Müller,et al.  Impact of Land-Use Intensity and Productivity on Bryophyte Diversity in Agricultural Grasslands , 2012, PloS one.

[38]  F. Herzog,et al.  Interactive effects of landscape context constrain the effectiveness of local agri‐environmental management , 2012 .

[39]  R. Kowalczyk,et al.  Conservation implications of the refugee species concept and the European bison: king of the forest or refugee in a marginal habitat? , 2012 .

[40]  J. Settele,et al.  Dos and Don’ts for butterflies of the Habitats Directive of the European Union , 2012 .

[41]  Z. Fric,et al.  Mark–recapture on large spatial scale reveals long distance dispersal in the Marsh Fritillary, Euphydryas aurinia , 2011 .

[42]  Teja Tscharntke,et al.  Landscape-moderated biodiversity effects of agri-environmental management: a meta-analysis , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  R. ffrench-Constant,et al.  Butterflies on the brink: habitat requirements for declining populations of the marsh fritillary (Euphydryas aurinia) in SW England , 2011, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[44]  D. Roy,et al.  The effects of habitat fragmentation on niche requirements of the marsh fritillary, Euphydryas aurinia, (Rottemburg, 1775) on calcareous grasslands in southern UK , 2011, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[45]  S. Fattorini A RESOURCE-BASED HABITAT VIEW FOR CONSERVATION: BUTTERFLIES IN THE BRITISH LANDSCAPE , 2010 .

[46]  T. Herben,et al.  Restoration of Species‐Rich, Nutrient‐Limited Mountain Grassland by Mowing and Fertilization , 2010 .

[47]  V. Vandvik,et al.  Nitrogen deposition threatens species richness of grasslands across Europe. , 2010, Environmental pollution.

[48]  T. Schmitt,et al.  Changing demography and dispersal behaviour: ecological adaptations in an alpine butterfly , 2010, Oecologia.

[49]  T. Schmitt,et al.  Demography, dispersal and movement pattern of Euphydryas aurinia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) at the Iberian Peninsula: an alarming example in an increasingly fragmented landscape? , 2010, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[50]  A. Bleeker,et al.  Changes in species richness and composition in European acidic grasslands over the past 70 years: the contribution of cumulative atmospheric nitrogen deposition , 2010 .

[51]  G. Phoenix,et al.  Bryophyte physiological responses to, and recovery from, long-term nitrogen deposition and phosphorus fertilisation in acidic grassland. , 2008, The New phytologist.

[52]  Stéphane Dray,et al.  Testing the species traits-environment relationships: the fourth-corner problem revisited. , 2008, Ecology.

[53]  Matthew H Poore,et al.  Runoff water quality from manured riparian grasslands with contrasting drainage and simulated grazing pressure , 2008 .

[54]  P. Dinnétz,et al.  Food plant density, patch isolation and vegetation height determine occurrence in a Swedish metapopulation of the marsh fritillary Euphydryas aurinia (Rottemburg, 1775) (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) , 2007, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[55]  Robert J. Wilson,et al.  Minimum viable metapopulation size, extinction debt, and the conservation of a declining species. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[56]  Henrik G. Smith,et al.  Effects of grassland abandonment, restoration and management on butterflies and vascular plants , 2006 .

[57]  R. Xu,et al.  Habitat utilization by ovipositing females and larvae of the Marsh fritillary (Euphydryas aurinia) in a mosaic of meadows and croplands , 2006, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[58]  Henrik G. Smith,et al.  The relationship between local extinctions of grassland butterflies and increased soil nitrogen levels , 2006 .

[59]  Nicolas Schtickzelle,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics and conservation of the marsh fritillary butterfly: Population viability analysis and management options for a critically endangered species in Western Europe , 2005 .

[60]  Z. Fric,et al.  Marsh Fritillary (Euphydryas aurinia) in the Czech Republic: monitoring, metapopulation structure, and conservation of an endangered butterfly , 2004 .

[61]  K. Kiehl,et al.  Alternative management on fens: Response of vegetation to grazing and mowing , 2003 .

[62]  Z. Fric,et al.  Habitat of pre-hibernating larvae of the endangered butterfly Euphydryas aurinia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): What can be learned from vegetation composition and architecture? , 2003 .

[63]  T. Fartmann,et al.  Combining larval habitat quality and metapopulation structure – the key for successful management of pre-alpine Euphydryas aurinia colonies , 2003, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[64]  N. J. Ouborg,et al.  Effects of population size and genetic variation on the response of Succisa pratensis to eutrophication and acidification , 2003 .

[65]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Dynamic populations in a dynamic landscape: the metapopulation structure of the marsh fritillary butterfly , 2002 .

[66]  I. Pen,et al.  When random sampling does not work: standard design falsely indicates maladaptive host preferences in a butterfly , 2002 .

[67]  N. Boatman,et al.  Ecological impacts of arable intensification in Europe. , 2001, Journal of environmental management.

[68]  M. Morris The effects of structure and its dynamics on the ecology and conservation of arthropods in British grasslands , 2000 .

[69]  P. Legendre,et al.  RELATING BEHAVIOR TO HABITAT: SOLUTIONS TO THEFOURTH-CORNER PROBLEM , 1997 .

[70]  J. Thomas Holocene climate changes and warm man‐made refugia may explain why a sixth of British butterflies possess unnatural early‐successional habitats , 1993 .

[71]  F. Fukarek Pflanzensoziologie , 1964 .

[72]  Matthias Weitzel,et al.  A question of adaptability: Climate and habitat change lower trait diversity in butterfly communities in south-western Germany , 2013 .

[73]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  Canoco Reference Manual and User’s Guide: Software for Ordination (version 5.0) , 2012 .

[74]  J. Sádlo,et al.  Vegetace České republiky 3. Vodní a mokřadní vegetace , 2011 .

[75]  J. Gamarra,et al.  Metapopulation Ecology , 2007 .

[76]  Chris van Swaay,et al.  Biotope use and trends of European butterflies , 2006, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[77]  邬建国 Metapopulation(复合种群)究竟是什么? , 2000 .