An Innovative Ultrasonic Time-of-Flight Measurement Method Using Peak Time Sequences of Different Frequencies—Part II: Implementation

This paper researches on the implementation of an ultrasonic time-of-flight (TOF) measuring system by the difference of the peak time sequences (PTSs) of dual frequencies. The process to develop appropriate implementation parameters was demonstrated. Critical characteristics of the transient behavior of the PTS were studied, and their counteracting data processing measures were devised in the process. Obtaining the PTS by averaging repeated test data and the linear regression on the PTS was found to be effective in uncovering the actual TOF of the first wavefront with high precision. A PC-based test bench was built to test the characteristics and to verify the performance of the new TOF measurement system. In our TOF measurement over the distance of 145 cm, a standard deviation (STD) of 0.0113 of a period was achieved by a nominal driving wave period of 25.6 μs (39 kHz) and a frequency difference factor of 0.0048. When applied to a distance measurement, the worst STD of 0.097 mm was achieved with a relative distance ranging up to 1450 mm, given the nominal driving wavelength of 8.6 mm. This new dual-frequency PTS-based TOF measurement system can be economically embedded in a microcontroller, together with a field-programmable gate array, and some simple transistors that are suitable for positioning mobile units indoors or in small open-field environments.

[1]  C. Narduzzi,et al.  Digital time of flight measurement for ultrasonic sensors , 1991, [1991] Conference Record. IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference.

[2]  S. L. Hill,et al.  A multifrequency AM-based ultrasonic system for accuracy distance measurement , 1994 .

[3]  Ming-Shing Young,et al.  Multiple-frequency continuous wave ultrasonic system for accurate distance measurement , 1999 .

[4]  Leopoldo Angrisani,et al.  Ultrasonic time-of-flight estimation through unscented Kalman filter , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[5]  F. Gueuning,et al.  Accurate distance measurement by an autonomous ultrasonic system combining time-of-flight and phase-shift methods , 1996, Quality Measurement: The Indispensable Bridge between Theory and Reality (No Measurements? No Science! Joint Conference - 1996: IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference and IMEKO Tec.

[6]  L. Angrisani,et al.  A measurement method based on Kalman filtering for ultrasonic time-of-flight estimation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[7]  Chi-Ming Yang,et al.  An Innovative Ultrasonic Time-of-Flight Measurement Method Using Peak Time Sequences of Different Frequencies: Part I , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[8]  Lawrence E. Kinsler,et al.  Fundamentals of acoustics , 1950 .

[9]  Herbert Schweinzer,et al.  High resolution ultrasonic distance measurement in air using coded signals , 2002, IMTC/2002. Proceedings of the 19th IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37276).

[10]  O. Cramer The variation of the specific heat ratio and the speed of sound in air with temperature, pressure, humidity, and CO2 concentration , 1993 .

[11]  Leopoldo Angrisani,et al.  Estimating ultrasonic time-of-flight through quadrature demodulation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[12]  Shigeru Okuma,et al.  Distance measurement by an ultrasonic system based on a digital polarity correlator , 2001, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas..