Chiral phosphorothioate analogues of B-DNA: The crystal structure of Rp-d¦Gp(S)CpGp(S)CpGp(S)C¦☆

Abstract The compound Rp-d¦Gp(S)CpGp(S)CpGp(S)C¦, an analogue of the deoxyoligomer d(G-C) 3 , crystallizes in space group P 2 1 2 1 2 1 with a = 34.90 A , b = 39.15 A and c = 20.64 A . The structure, which is not isomorphous with any previously determined deoxyoligonucleotide, was refined to an R factor of 14.5% at a resolution of 2.17 A, with 72 solvent molecules located. The two strands of the asymmetric unit form a right-handed double helix, which is a new example of a B -DNA conformation and brings to light an important and overlooked component of flexibility of the double helix. This flexibility is manifest in the alternation of the backbone conformation between two states, defined by the adjacent torsion angles e and ζ, trans.gauche —( B I) and gauche—.trans ( B II). B I is characteristic of classical of B -DNA and has an average C (1′) to C (1′) separation of 4.5 A. The corresponding separation for B II is 5.3 A. Each state is associated with a distinct phosphate orientation where the plane of the PO2 (or POS) group is alternately near horizontal or vertical with respect to the helix axis. The B I and B II conformations are out of phase on the two strands. As a consequence, on one strand purine-pyrimidine stacking is better than pyrimidine-purine, while the converse holds for the other strand. At each base-pair step, good and bad stacking alternate across the helix axis. The pattern of alternation is regular in the context of a fundamental dinucleotide repeat. Re-examination of the B -DNA dodecamer d(C-G-C-G-A-A-T-T-C-G-C-G) shows that the C-G-C-G regions contain the B I and B II conformations, and the associated dual phosphate orientation and asymmetric base stacking. Different mechanisms are used in the two structures to avoid clashes between guanine residues on opposite strands, a combination of lateral slide, tilt and helical twist in the present structure, and base roll, tilt and longitudinal slide (Calladine rules) in the dodecamer. The flexibility of the phosphate orientations demonstrated in this structure is important, since it offers a structural basis for protein-nucleic acid recognition.

[1]  J. Suggs,et al.  Evidence for sequence-specific conformational changes in DNA from the melting temperatures of DNA phosphorothioate derivatives. , 1985, Nucleic acids research.

[2]  E Westhof,et al.  Crystallographic refinement of yeast aspartic acid transfer RNA. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Synthesis of d(GC) and d(CG) octamers containing alternating phosphorothioate linkages: effect of the phosphorothioate group on the B-Z transition. , 1985, Biochemistry.

[4]  P. Frey,et al.  Bond order and charge localization in nucleoside phosphorothioates. , 1985, Science.

[5]  H. Vosberg,et al.  Relaxation of supercoiled phosphorothioate DNA by mammalian topoisomerases is inhibited in a base-specific manner. , 1985, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[6]  D. Rabinovich,et al.  A new approach to structure determination of large molecules by multi-dimensional search methods , 1984 .

[7]  T. Jovin,et al.  Assignment of resonances in the phosphorus-31 nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum of poly[d(A-T)] from phosphorothioate substitution. , 1983, Biochemistry.

[8]  H R Drew,et al.  Ordered water structure around a B-DNA dodecamer. A quantitative study. , 1983, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  H R Drew,et al.  Reversible bending and helix geometry in a B-DNA dodecamer: CGCGAATTBrCGCG. , 1982, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[10]  C R Calladine,et al.  Mechanics of sequence-dependent stacking of bases in B-DNA. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  Robin Taylor,et al.  Molecular structures of nucleosides and nucleotides. 2. Orthogonal coordinates for standard nucleic acid base residues , 1982 .

[12]  H R Drew,et al.  Structure of a B-DNA dodecamer. III. Geometry of hydration. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  H R Drew,et al.  Structure of a B-DNA dodecamer. II. Influence of base sequence on helix structure. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  A Klug,et al.  Sequence-dependent variation in the conformation of DNA. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  A. Rich,et al.  Left-handed double helical DNA: variations in the backbone conformation. , 1981, Science.

[16]  Dorothy Crowfoot Hodgkin,et al.  BIOMOLECULAR STRUCTURE, CONFORMATION, FUNCTION, AND EVOLUTION , 1981 .

[17]  Richard E. Dickerson,et al.  Crystal structure analysis of a complete turn of B-DNA , 1980, Nature.

[18]  W. Saenger,et al.  Crystal and Molecular Structure of Adenosine 5′‐O‐Phosphorothioate O‐p‐Nitrophenyl Ester (Sp Diastereomer) , 1979 .

[19]  S. A. Salisbury,et al.  DNA double helical fragment at atomic resolution , 1978, Nature.

[20]  H. Vosberg,et al.  Incorporation of phosphorothioate groups into fd and phi X174 DNA. , 1977, Biochemistry.

[21]  F. Eckstein Untersuchung der Wirkungsweise von Enzymen mit Nucleosidphosphorothioaten , 1975 .

[22]  D. Suck,et al.  On the Mechanism of Ribonuclease A , 1974 .

[23]  M. Sundaralingam,et al.  Conformational analysis of the sugar ring in nucleosides and nucleotides. A new description using the concept of pseudorotation. , 1972, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[24]  D W Hukins,et al.  Optimised parameters for A-DNA and B-DNA. , 1972, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[25]  W. Saenger,et al.  Stereochemistry of a substrate for pancreatic ribonuclease. Crystal and molecular structure of the triethylammonium salt of uridine 2', 3'-0,0-cyclophosphorothioate , 1970 .