Implied motion from static photographs influences the perceived position of stationary objects

A growing amount of evidence suggests that viewing a photograph depicting motion activates the same direction-selective neurons involved in the perception of real motion. It has been shown that prolonged exposure (adaptation) to photographs depicting directional motion can induce motion adaptation and consequently motion aftereffect. The present study investigated whether adapting to photographs depicting humans, animals, and vehicles that move leftward or rightward also generates a positional aftereffect (the motion-induced position shift--MIPS), in which the perceived spatial position of a target pattern is shifted in the opposite direction to that of adaptation. Results showed that adapting to still photographs depicting objects that move in a particular direction shifts the perceived position of subsequently presented stationary objects opposite to the depicted adaptation direction and that this effect depends on the retinotopic location of the adapting stimulus. These results suggest that the implied motion could activate the same direction-selective and speed-tuned mechanisms that produce positional aftereffect when viewing real motion.

[1]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Sensitivity of MST neurons to optic flow stimuli. I. A continuum of response selectivity to large-field stimuli. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Temporal and Spatial Frequency Tuning of the Flicker Motion Aftereffect , 1996, Vision Research.

[3]  G. Orban,et al.  Coding of Shape and Position in Macaque Lateral Intraparietal Area , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  J. Gaddum Probit Analysis , 1948, Nature.

[5]  David Whitaker,et al.  Motion Adaptation Distorts Perceived Visual Position , 2002, Current Biology.

[6]  S. Nishida,et al.  Contrast Dependencies of Two Types of Motion Aftereffect , 1997, Vision Research.

[7]  Szonya Durant,et al.  Temporal dependence of local motion induced shifts in perceived position , 2004, Vision Research.

[8]  J H van Hateren,et al.  Simulating human cones from mid-mesopic up to high-photopic luminances. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[9]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Sensitivity of MST neurons to optic flow stimuli. II. Mechanisms of response selectivity revealed by small-field stimuli. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Activation in Human MT/MST by Static Images with Implied Motion , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  Tom Troscianko,et al.  Optimal feature integration in visual search. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[12]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Motion adaptation shifts apparent position without the motion aftereffect , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  Emad N Eskandar,et al.  Parietal activity and the perceived direction of ambiguous apparent motion , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  S. McKee,et al.  Statistical properties of forced-choice psychometric functions: Implications of probit analysis , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain activity accompanying perception of implied motion in abstract paintings. , 2007, Spatial vision.

[16]  Sieu K. Khuu,et al.  The perceived position shift of a pattern that contains internal motion is accompanied by a change in the pattern’s apparent size and shape , 2007, Vision Research.

[17]  J. Winawer,et al.  A Motion Aftereffect From Still Photographs Depicting Motion , 2008, Psychological science.

[18]  Jeannette A. M. Lorteije,et al.  Implied Motion Activation in Cortical Area MT Can Be Explained by Visual Low-level Features , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  David Whitney,et al.  Flexible retinotopy: motion-dependent position coding in the visual cortex. , 2010, Science.

[20]  E. Bullmore,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of implicit-motion perception or ‘representational momentum’ , 2000, Current Biology.

[21]  Harold E. Bedell,et al.  Spatial and temporal properties of the illusory motion-induced position shift for drifting stimuli , 2007, Vision Research.

[22]  David Whitney,et al.  Second-order motion shifts perceived position , 2006, Vision Research.

[23]  G. Mather,et al.  The motion aftereffect reloaded , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  S. Nishida,et al.  Complete interocular transfer of motion aftereffect with flickering test , 1994, Vision Research.

[25]  Alice Mado Proverbio,et al.  Observation of Static Pictures of Dynamic Actions Enhances the Activity of Movement-Related Brain Areas , 2009, PloS one.

[26]  Nicholas J. Priebe,et al.  The Neural Representation of Speed in Macaque Area MT/V5 , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  S M Kosslyn,et al.  Can imagery be distinguished from other forms of internal representation? Evidence from studies of information retrieval times , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[28]  Shin'ya Nishida,et al.  Linking lower and higher stages of motion processing? , 1997, Vision Research.

[29]  Y. Dan,et al.  Asymmetry in Visual Cortical Circuits Underlying Motion-Induced Perceptual Mislocalization , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  George Mather,et al.  Distinct position assignment mechanisms revealed by cross-order motion , 2008, Vision Research.

[31]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[32]  K. Tanaka,et al.  Analysis of motion of the visual field by direction, expansion/contraction, and rotation cells clustered in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  Timothy Ledgeway,et al.  Visual adaptation reveals asymmetric spatial frequency tuning for motion. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[34]  Jeannette A. M. Lorteije,et al.  Delayed Response to Animate Implied Motion in Human Motion Processing Areas , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  Jonathan Winawer,et al.  A motion aftereffect from visual imagery of motion , 2010, Cognition.

[36]  M. Osaka,et al.  Implied motion because of instability in Hokusai Manga activates the human motion-sensitive extrastriate visual cortex: an fMRI study of the impact of visual art , 2010, Neuroreport.

[37]  K. D. De Valois,et al.  Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors. , 1991, Vision research.

[38]  Jeannette A. M. Lorteije,et al.  Adaptation to Real Motion Reveals Direction-selective Interactions between Real and Implied Motion Processing , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  Ikuya Murakami,et al.  Illusory position shift induced by plaid motion , 2009, Vision Research.

[40]  Adrian L Williams,et al.  Static representations of speed and their neural correlates in human area MT/V5 , 2009, Neuroreport.

[41]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[42]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[43]  David Whitney,et al.  Position shifts following crowded second-order motion adaptation reveal processing of local and global motion without awareness. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[44]  Paul V McGraw,et al.  Motion-Sensitive Neurones in V5/MT Modulate Perceived Spatial Position , 2004, Current Biology.

[45]  George Mather,et al.  Motion-induced position shifts occur after motion integration , 2009, Vision Research.

[46]  David Whitney,et al.  The influence of visual motion on perceived position , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.