Risk assessment of the maintenance process for onshore oil and gas transmission pipelines under uncertainty

Abstract Research on risk assessment of the maintenance process for onshore oil and gas transmission pipelines has been attracting ever more attention from the academic community. Due to the existence of uncertainties, risk propagation can hardly be precisely and/or robustly assessed. Therefore, in this paper, considering that decision-makers prefer uncertainty-informed risk information rather than unreliable “precise” risk values, a new insight is provided to deal with risk assessment of the onshore pipeline maintenance process under uncertainty. The risk assessment model is built on the framework of quantitative risk assessment based on AHP and expert knowledge. Meanwhile, to represent and quantify uncertainty, interval analysis is utilized to extend the whole model into an interval environment. As a result, an interval quantified risk assessment model is established for the onshore pipeline maintenance process. The study shows that interval analysis can effectively internalize, represent, quantify and propagate the uncertainty in the risk assessment model. In the specific case of emergency maintenance for the Gangqing dual pipeline, the interval scores to respectively characterize the occurrence likelihood and consequence severity are computed. As a result, the uncertainty-informed overall risk of the emergency maintenance process is determined and intuitively pinpointed in an interval risk matrix. The risk rating of the case is estimated as Level 2, indicating that operations with respect to emergency maintenance are well organized and the possibility of accident occurrence is low. Thus, maintenance can be carried out well under supervision. Even if a secondary accident would occur, the accident scope will be quite small and emergency measures are adequate enough to control the development of the accident and reduce accident losses. Moreover, the sensitivity sorting of sub-indexes of occurrence likelihood is obtained as I11 > I23 > I13 > I22 > I34 > I12 > I33 > I21 > I31 > I32, indicating that improvement in the management capacity (I11), normal operations (I13) and completeness of protection (I22) will effectively reduce the occurrence of accidents and improve operational safety. Furthermore, risk estimation under the condition of missing data is tackled by using Monte Carlo simulations and provides a reasonable option when crucial information is lacking.

[1]  Ramon E. Moore,et al.  Interval analysis and fuzzy set theory , 2003, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[2]  Liu Ling.  Threat assessment for air combat target based on interval TOPSIS , 2009 .

[3]  T. Aven,et al.  Concerns, Challenges, and Directions of Development for the Issue of Representing Uncertainty in Risk Assessment , 2014, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[4]  Wei Liang,et al.  Dual-tree complex wavelet transform and SVD based acoustic noise reduction and its application in leak detection for natural gas pipeline , 2016 .

[5]  R. Baker Kearfott,et al.  Introduction to Interval Analysis , 2009 .

[6]  Luis Mateus Rocha,et al.  Computing Uncertainty in Interval Based Sets , 1996 .

[7]  Hongyong Liu,et al.  Risk propagation mechanism: Qingdao Crude Oil Leaking and Explosion case study , 2015 .

[8]  Wei Liang,et al.  A comprehensive risk evaluation method for natural gas pipelines by combining a risk matrix with a bow-tie model , 2015 .

[9]  Qunli Wu,et al.  Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation of the Power Distribution Network Planning Project Based on Improved IAHP and Multi-Level Extension Assessment Method , 2016 .

[10]  V. Kreinovich,et al.  Experimental uncertainty estimation and statistics for data having interval uncertainty. , 2007 .

[11]  Xiang Li,et al.  A sustainability root cause analysis methodology and its application , 2011, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[12]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[13]  Zhang Hon.  To implement the pipeline integrity management by learning from Huangdao accident , 2014 .

[14]  Hongwei Zhu,et al.  Quantitative risk analysis on leakage failure of submarine oil and gas pipelines using Bayesian network , 2016 .

[15]  Jay D. Johnson,et al.  A sampling-based computational strategy for the representation of epistemic uncertainty in model predictions with evidence theory , 2007 .

[16]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Literature review of methods for representing uncertainty , 2013 .

[17]  Rehan Sadiq,et al.  A fuzzy Bayesian belief network for safety assessment of oil and gas pipelines , 2016 .

[18]  Terje Aven,et al.  On the Need for Restricting the Probabilistic Analysis in Risk Assessments to Variability , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[19]  Wei Liang,et al.  Integrated leakage detection and localization model for gas pipelines based on the acoustic wave method , 2014 .

[20]  Cheng-Chung Lin,et al.  A study of storage tank accidents , 2006 .

[21]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Some considerations on the treatment of uncertainties in risk assessment for practical decision making , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[22]  William Ho,et al.  Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications - A literature review , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Possibility theory and statistical reasoning , 2006, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[24]  Prasanta Kumar Dey,et al.  A risk‐based model for inspection and maintenance of cross‐country petroleum pipeline , 2001 .

[25]  Qixin Cao,et al.  Development of new pipeline maintenance system for repairing early-built offshore oil pipelines , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology.

[26]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  An exploration of alternative approaches to the representation of uncertainty in model predictions , 2003, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[27]  Sushil Kumar,et al.  Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Genserik Reniers,et al.  On the assessment of uncertainty in risk diagrams , 2016 .