How to benefit from open innovation? An empirical investigation of open innovation, external partnerships and firm capabilities in the automotive industry

Prior research on open innovation primarily focused on theoretical perceptions about the transaction of technologies in information technology, pharmaceutical and electronics industry. Research about open innovation in the automotive industry has hardly received attention. However, the automotive industry has long been cooperating with external partners and nowadays acquires about three quarters of the value created from their suppliers. Based on theoretical findings of other industries, we examine the role of technology transactions and external partnerships in fostering firm capabilities. Survey responses from the German automotive industry let us empirically test seven hypotheses with a multiple regression model. Based on a firm's individual resource configuration and capability level, results show that some firms clearly profit more from openness than others. With this study, we extend research about open innovation in an industry where it has not been done before and empirically test the concept to overcome the prescriptive character of recent research on open innovation.

[1]  Dilek Çetindamar,et al.  Understanding technology management as a dynamic capability: A framework for technology management activities , 2009 .

[2]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[3]  D. Chronéer,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF AN EFFECTIVE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS: TOWARDS A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR PROCESS INDUSTRY , 2006 .

[4]  D. Gann,et al.  How open is innovation , 2010 .

[5]  Thomas Lager,et al.  Equipment supplier/user collaboration in the process industries: In search of enhanced operating performance , 2010 .

[6]  Mari Sako,et al.  Supplier relations in the UK car industry: good news—bad news , 1994 .

[7]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[8]  Paul Humphreys,et al.  European car makers and their suppliers: changes at the interface , 1998 .

[9]  P. Trott,et al.  WHY 'OPEN INNOVATION' IS OLD WINE IN NEW BOTTLES , 2009, International Journal of Innovation Management.

[10]  Francisco J. Molina-Castillo,et al.  Product competence exploitation and exploration strategies: The impact on new product performance through quality and innovativeness , 2011 .

[11]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[12]  Alexander Brem.  The Boundaries of Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Conceptual Background and Essays on Selected Theoretical and Empirical Aspects , 2008 .

[13]  Eric W. K. Tsang,et al.  Knowledge management and innovation strategy in the Asia Pacific: Toward an institution-based view , 2008 .

[14]  O. Bertrand.  Effects of foreign acquisitions on R&D activity: Evidence from firm-level data for France , 2009 .

[15]  Eric W. K. Tsang,et al.  How do internal capabilities and external partnerships affect innovativeness? , 2009 .

[16]  H. Ernst,et al.  Opening Up the Innovation Process: The Role of Technology Aggressiveness , 2009 .

[17]  Cynthia W. Cann,et al.  Post-purchase strategy: A key to successful industrial marketing and customer satisfaction , 1995 .

[18]  O. Gassmann,et al.  Open R&D and Open Innovation: Exploring the Phenomenon , 2009 .

[19]  B. Weijters,et al.  The effect of rating scale format on response styles: the number of response categories and response catgory labels , 2010 .

[20]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[21]  David Ford,et al.  Develop your Technology Strategy , 1988 .

[22]  Andrea Fosfuri,et al.  Managing External Knowledge Flows: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity , 2009 .

[23]  P. Cooke.  Regionally asymmetric knowledge capabilities and open innovation: Exploring 'Globalisation 2'--A new model of industry organisation , 2005 .

[24]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: A research agenda , 2006 .

[25]  Z. Zhao,et al.  A multilevel perspective on knowledge transfer: evidence from the Chinese automotive industry , 2009 .

[26]  S. Borgatti,et al.  The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology , 2003 .

[27]  M. Porter.  TECHNOLOGY AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE , 1985 .

[28]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[29]  Julie L Davis,et al.  Edison in the Boardroom: How Leading Companies Realize Value from Their Intellectual Assets , 2001 .

[30]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery , 2003 .

[31]  Oliver Gassmann,et al.  Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: Three Core Process Archetypes , 2004 .

[32]  A. Albers,et al.  Open Innovation in the Automotive Industry , 2010 .

[33]  Linda Argote,et al.  Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[34]  Alan W. Pearson,et al.  Innovation in Process Plant: A Case Study of Ethylene , 1995 .

[35]  Alexander Brem,et al.  Innovation management in emerging technology ventures – the concept of an integrated idea management , 2007 .

[36]  Balaji R. Koka,et al.  The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct , 2006 .

[37]  Nina Baur,et al.  Datenanalyse mit SPSS für Fortgeschrittene , 2004 .

[38]  A. Arora,et al.  Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy , 2002 .

[39]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Beyond High Tech: Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other Industries , 2006 .

[40]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[41]  A. Brem,et al.  Product development in the automotive industry: crucial success drivers for technological innovations , 2008 .

[42]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[43]  K. Valkokari,et al.  KNOWLEDGE AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT IN CUSTOMER–SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS , 2010 .

[44]  Gerard A. Athaide,et al.  Managing Seller–Buyer Relationships during New Product Development* , 2009 .

[45]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[46]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[47]  Petri Rouvinen,et al.  Characteristics of product and process innovators: some evidence from the Finnish innovation survey , 2002 .

[48]  M. Tushman,et al.  External Communication and Project Performance: An Investigation Into the Role of Gatekeepers , 2011 .

[49]  Thomas Lager,et al.  Success factors for the development of process technology in process industry. Part 2: a ranking of success factors on an operational level and a dynamic model for company implementation , 2005 .

[50]  U. Lichtenthaler.  OpenInnovation:rentDebates,andFutureDirections , 2011 .

[51]  Jakob Edler,et al.  Changes in the Strategic Management of Technology: Results of a Global Benchmarking Study , 2002 .

[52]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  Managing Joint Ventures , 2009 .

[53]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[54]  A. Bonaccorsi,et al.  Strategic Partnerships in New Product Development: an Italian Case Study , 1994 .

[55]  David Kline,et al.  Rembrandts in the Attic: Unlocking the Hidden Value of Patents , 1999 .

[56]  Gerard A. Athaide,et al.  Understanding New Product Co-Development Relationships in Technology-Based, Industrial Markets , 2003 .