Inspector Baxter: The Social Aspects of Integrating a Robot as a Quality Inspector in an Assembly Line

We are interested in the social implications of working alongside robots. In this paper we look at a humanoid robot quality inspector, acting alongside workers in an assembly line. This setting is viable in small scale assembly lines where human assembly workers provide flexible, rapid assembly. A robotic quality inspector could enhance the quality assurance process, but places the robot in a position of relative seniority to the assembly workers. We present the results of an initial in-lab pilot study designed with our industry collaborators. In our pilot, a humanoid robot visually inspected participants' assembled products in a shared workspace and provided critiques that follow simple models of robotic social feedback. Our findings suggest that people's opinions of the robot (trust, impression of intelligence, etc.) changed based on the robot's social behaviors while it is judging the participant's work. Additionally, people rated the robot more negatively if they disagreed with the robot's opinions of their work, regardless of the robot social behavior and the value of its critique.

[1]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Influences of Evaluation and Gaze from a Robot and Humans’ Fear of Negative Evaluation on Their Preferences of the Robot , 2015, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[2]  Derek Cormier,et al.  Would You Do as a Robot Commands? An Obedience Study for Human-Robot Interaction , 2013 .

[3]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Using Robots to Moderate Team Conflict: The Case of Repairing Violations , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[4]  Stephane Durocher,et al.  Placing robots in positions of authority : a human-robot interaction obedience study , 2013 .

[5]  Karon E. MacLean,et al.  Gestures for industry Intuitive human-robot communication from human observation , 2013, 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[6]  Xiaotian Wang,et al.  Dynamic Emotion-Based Human-Robot Collaborative Assembly in Manufacturing : The Preliminary Concepts , 2014 .

[7]  J. Miura,et al.  Human-Robot Collaborative Assembly by On-line Human Action Recognition Based on an FSM Task Model , 2013 .

[8]  Ehud Sharlin,et al.  Toward Acceptable Domestic Robots: Applying Insights from Social Psychology , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[9]  I. ClintHeyer.  Human-Robot Interaction and Future Industrial Robotics Applications , 2010 .

[10]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Human–Robot Interaction , 2016, Hum. Factors.

[11]  A. Bicchi,et al.  Physical human-robot interaction: Dependability, safety, and performance , 2008, 2008 10th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control.

[12]  S. Milgram.  BEHAVIORAL STUDY OF OBEDIENCE. , 1963, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[13]  Marek P. Michalowski,et al.  Robots in the wild: observing human-robot social interaction outside the lab , 2006, 9th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, 2006..

[14]  Karon E. MacLean,et al.  Analysis of task-based gestures in human-robot interaction , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  Alois Knoll,et al.  Joint-action for humans and industrial robots for assembly tasks , 2008, RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[16]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Toward sociable robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[17]  Terrence Fong,et al.  Collaboration, Dialogue, Human-Robot Interaction , 2001, ISRR.

[18]  Charles C. Kemp,et al.  Human-Robot Interaction for Cooperative Manipulation: Handing Objects to One Another , 2007, RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[19]  James Everett Young,et al.  Autonomy, Embodiment, and Obedience to Robots , 2015, HRI.

[20]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[21]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.