Thermal unfolding simulations of a multimeric protein—Transition state and unfolding pathways

The folding of an oligomeric protein poses an extra challenge to the folding problem because the protein not only has to fold correctly; it has to avoid nonproductive aggregation. We have carried out over 100 molecular dynamics simulations using an implicit solvation model at different temperatures to study the unfolding of one of the smallest known tetramers, p53 tetramerization domain (p53tet). We found that unfolding started with disruption of the native tetrameric hydrophobic core. The transition state for the tetramer to dimer transition was characterized as a diverse ensemble of different structures using Φ value analysis in quantitative agreement with experimental data. Despite the diversity, the ensemble was still native‐like with common features such as partially exposed tetramer hydrophobic core and shifts in the dimer–dimer arrangements. After passing the transition state, the secondary and tertiary structures continued to unfold until the primary dimers broke free. The free dimer had little secondary structure left and the final free monomers were random‐coil like. Both the transition states and the unfolding pathways from these trajectories were very diverse, in agreement with the new view of protein folding. The multiple simulations showed that the folding of p53tet is a mixture of the framework and nucleation‐condensation mechanisms and the folding is coupled to the complex formation. We have also calculated the entropy and effective energy for the different states along the unfolding pathway and found that the tetramerization is stabilized by hydrophobic interactions. Proteins 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  C. Arrowsmith,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of the structural stability of the tetrameric oligomerization domain of p53 tumor suppressor. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[2]  A. Fersht,et al.  Folding of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2. 2. Influence of proline isomerization on the folding kinetics and thermodynamic characterization of the transition state of folding. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[3]  B. Lee,et al.  The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. , 1971, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  Valerie Daggett,et al.  Unifying features in protein-folding mechanisms , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  A. Li,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulation of the unfolding of barnase , 1998 .

[6]  L. Serrano,et al.  Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: a study of more than 1000 mutations. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  A. Li,et al.  Characterization of the transition state of protein unfolding by use of molecular dynamics: chymotrypsin inhibitor 2. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  A. Fersht,et al.  Is there a unifying mechanism for protein folding? , 2003, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[9]  B. Pontius Close encounters: why unstructured, polymeric domains can increase rates of specific macromolecular association. , 1993, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[10]  A. Fersht,et al.  Protein Folding and Unfolding at Atomic Resolution , 2002, Cell.

[11]  A. Cavalli,et al.  Weak temperature dependence of the free energy surface and folding pathways of structured peptides , 2002, Proteins.

[12]  M. Karplus,et al.  Effective energy function for proteins in solution , 1999, Proteins.

[13]  M Karplus,et al.  Unfolding proteins by external forces and temperature: the importance of topology and energetics. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  A. Fersht,et al.  Effect of cavity-creating mutations in the hydrophobic core of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[15]  P. Argos,et al.  Knowledge‐based protein secondary structure assignment , 1995, Proteins.

[16]  Alan R. Fersht,et al.  Mechanism of folding and assembly of a small tetrameric protein domain from tumor suppressor p53 , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[17]  V Daggett,et al.  Direct comparison of experimental and calculated folding free energies for hydrophobic deletion mutants of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2: free energy perturbation calculations using transition and denatured states from molecular dynamics simulations of unfolding. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[18]  C. Brooks,et al.  From folding theories to folding proteins: a review and assessment of simulation studies of protein folding and unfolding. , 2001, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[19]  M. Karplus,et al.  Determination of a transition state at atomic resolution from protein engineering data. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  Jun Shimada,et al.  Commitment and nucleation in the protein G transition state. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  N. Pavletich,et al.  Crystal structure of the tetramerization domain of the p53 tumor suppressor at 1.7 angstroms , 1995, Science.

[22]  L Serrano,et al.  The folding of an enzyme. III. Structure of the transition state for unfolding of barnase analysed by a protein engineering procedure. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  S. Jackson,et al.  The folding pathway of ubiquitin from all-atom molecular dynamics simulations. , 2004, Biophysical chemistry.

[24]  C. Levinthal How to fold graciously , 1969 .

[25]  M. Karplus,et al.  Protein Folding: A Perspective from Theory and Experiment. , 1998, Angewandte Chemie.

[26]  G. Marius Clore,et al.  Refined solution structure of the oligomerization domain of the tumour suppressor p53 , 1995, Nature Structural Biology.

[27]  J. Milner,et al.  Cotranslation of activated mutant p53 with wild type drives the wild-type p53 protein into the mutant conformation , 1991, Cell.

[28]  A. Fersht,et al.  Transition-state structure as a unifying basis in protein-folding mechanisms: contact order, chain topology, stability, and the extended nucleus mechanism. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  T. Lazaridis,et al.  On the unfolding of α‐lytic protease and the role of the pro region , 2000, Proteins.

[30]  V. Daggett,et al.  Increasing temperature accelerates protein unfolding without changing the pathway of unfolding. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  A. Levine p53, the Cellular Gatekeeper for Growth and Division , 1997, Cell.

[32]  M. G. Mateu,et al.  Hydrogen exchange of the tetramerization domain of the human tumour suppressor p53 probed by denaturants and temperature. , 2001, European journal of biochemistry.

[33]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[34]  M. Hollstein,et al.  p53 and human cancer: the first ten thousand mutations. , 2000, Advances in cancer research.

[35]  M Karplus,et al.  "New view" of protein folding reconciled with the old through multiple unfolding simulations. , 1997, Science.

[36]  A. Fersht,et al.  The folding of an enzyme. I. Theory of protein engineering analysis of stability and pathway of protein folding. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  M. Karplus,et al.  Effective energy functions for protein structure prediction. , 2000, Current opinion in structural biology.

[38]  K. Takano ON SOLUTION OF , 1983 .

[39]  P. Friedman,et al.  The p53 protein is an unusually shaped tetramer that binds directly to DNA. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  Kresten Lindorff-Larsen,et al.  Calculation of mutational free energy changes in transition states for protein folding. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[41]  M. Karplus,et al.  Three key residues form a critical contact network in a protein folding transition state , 2001, Nature.

[42]  Jörg Gsponer,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of protein folding from the transition state , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[44]  A. Li,et al.  Identification and characterization of the unfolding transition state of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 by molecular dynamics simulations. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[45]  M. Levitt,et al.  Molecular dynamics of native protein. I. Computer simulation of trajectories. , 1983, Journal of molecular biology.

[46]  L. Mirny,et al.  Protein folding theory: from lattice to all-atom models. , 2001, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[47]  A. Fersht,et al.  Nine hydrophobic side chains are key determinants of the thermodynamic stability and oligomerization status of tumour suppressor p53 tetramerization domain , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[48]  V. Daggett,et al.  Characterization of the unfolding pathway of the cell-cycle protein p13suc1 by molecular dynamics simulations: implications for domain swapping. , 2000, Structure.

[49]  H. Berendsen,et al.  ALGORITHMS FOR MACROMOLECULAR DYNAMICS AND CONSTRAINT DYNAMICS , 1977 .

[50]  V. Daggett,et al.  Mapping the interactions present in the transition state for unfolding/folding of FKBP12. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[51]  Ioan Andricioaei,et al.  On the calculation of entropy from covariance matrices of the atomic fluctuations , 2001 .

[52]  M. Karplus,et al.  Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[53]  P. Tompa Intrinsically unstructured proteins. , 2002, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[54]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Oncogenic forms of p53 inhibit p53-regulated gene expression. , 1992, Science.

[55]  Valerie Daggett,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of the protein unfolding/folding reaction. , 2002, Accounts of chemical research.