Marine management--towards an integrated implementation of the European Marine Strategy Framework and the Water Framework Directives.

Through implementing environmental Directives, Europe has moved towards coordinated and integrated catchment-to-coast management, following the most novel legislation on ecosystem-based approaches worldwide. The novel joint synthesis of this direction reviewed here allows us to regard the Water Framework Directive (WFD) as a 'deconstructing structural approach' whereas the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) is a 'holistic functional approach', i.e. the WFD has split the ecosystem into several biological quality elements, then it compares the structure of these (such as species complement) individually before combining them and attempting to determine the overall condition. In contrast the MSFD concentrates on the set of 11 descriptors which together summarize the way in which the whole system functions. We emphasize that both Directives are frameworks on which many other directives are linked but that they need to be fully and seamlessly integrated to give a land to open sea system of assessment and management. Hence, by taking account of the experience gained in the WFD implementation, together with that from regional sea conventions, such as OSPAR (North East Atlantic) or HELCOM (Baltic Sea), we propose in this contribution an integrative approach for the environmental status assessment, within the MSFD.

[1]  Yngvar Olsen,et al.  A comparative study of responses in plankton food web structure and function in contrasting European coastal waters exposed to experimental nutrient addition , 2006 .

[2]  Michael Elliott,et al.  How good is good? Human values and Europe's proposed Marine Strategy Directive. , 2008, Marine pollution bulletin.

[3]  Jesper H Andersen,et al.  A simple method for confidence rating of eutrophication status classifications. , 2010, Marine pollution bulletin.

[4]  Carlo H. R. Heip,et al.  Nutrient dynamics in European water systems – the management perspective emerging from ELOISE, a European cluster of Land – Ocean interaction studies , 2006 .

[5]  D. Dauer,et al.  Use of multimetric indices to classify estuaries with different hydromorphological characteristics and different levels of human pressure. , 2008, Marine pollution bulletin.

[6]  J G Ferreira,et al.  Monitoring of coastal and transitional waters under the E.U. Water Framework Directive , 2007, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[7]  A. Konstantinos,et al.  A Comparative Assessment , 2003 .

[8]  J. Andersen,et al.  Eutrophication in the Baltic Sea – An integrated thematic assessment of the effects of nutrient enrichment and eutrophication in the Baltic Sea region. , 2009 .

[9]  I. Bateman,et al.  Coastal Management for Sustainable Development: Analysing Environmental and Socio-Economic Changes on the UK Coast , 1998 .

[10]  Ibon Galparsoro,et al.  Morphological characteristics of the Basque continental shelf (Bay of Biscay, northern Spain); their implications for Integrated Coastal Zone Management , 2010 .

[11]  Michael Elliott,et al.  The Estuarine Ecosystem: Ecology, Threats, and Management , 2004 .

[12]  Juan Bald,et al.  Using multiple ecosystem components, in assessing ecological status in Spanish (Basque Country) Atlantic marine waters. , 2009, Marine pollution bulletin.

[13]  P. Sandra,et al.  Water Framework Directive Intercalibration Technical Report. Part 2: Lakes , 2009 .

[14]  J. Druon,et al.  Comparative Assessment of Large-Scale Marine Eutrophication: North Sea Area and Adriatic Sea as Case Studies. , 2004 .

[15]  Ángel Borja,et al.  The European water framework directive: A challenge for nearshore, coastal and continental shelf research , 2005 .

[16]  Mark Crane,et al.  Proposed development of Sediment Quality Guidelines under the European Water Framework Directive: a critique. , 2003, Toxicology letters.

[17]  Kaj Forsius,et al.  HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan--a regional programme of measures for the marine environment based on the Ecosystem Approach. , 2010, Marine pollution bulletin.

[18]  Ulrich Claussen,et al.  Relationship between eutrophication reference conditions and boundary settings considering OSPAR recommendations and the Water Framework Directive—examples from the German Bight , 2009, Hydrobiologia.

[19]  V Stelzenmüller,et al.  Assessment of a Bayesian Belief Network-GIS framework as a practical tool to support marine planning. , 2010, Marine pollution bulletin.

[20]  Simon Jennings,et al.  Indicators to support an ecosystem approach to fisheries , 2005 .

[21]  Á. Borja,et al.  The European Water Framework Directive at the age of 10: a critical review of the achievements with recommendations for the future. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[22]  Ángel Borja,et al.  Assessing the environmental quality status in estuarine and coastal systems: Comparing methodologies and indices , 2008 .

[23]  M. Elliott,et al.  The use of environmental integrative indicators to assess seabed disturbance in estuaries and coasts: Application to the Humber Estuary, UK. , 2006, Marine pollution bulletin.

[24]  Steven Degraer,et al.  Habitat suitability modelling as a mapping tool for macrobenthic communities: An example from the Belgian part of the North Sea , 2008 .

[25]  Angel Borja,et al.  Problems associated with the 'one-out, all-out' principle, when using multiple ecosystem components in assessing the ecological status of marine waters. , 2010, Marine pollution bulletin.

[26]  C. Brown,et al.  Mapping benthic habitat in regions of gradational substrata: An automated approach utilising geophysical, geological, and biological relationships , 2008 .

[27]  Jacob Carstensen,et al.  Statistical principles for ecological status classification of Water Framework Directive monitoring data. , 2007, Marine pollution bulletin.

[28]  Michael Elliott,et al.  The role of the DPSIR approach and conceptual models in marine environmental management: an example for offshore wind power. , 2002, Marine pollution bulletin.

[29]  Evon M. O. Abu-Taieh,et al.  Comparative study , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[30]  Peter Ricketts,et al.  Coastal and Ocean Management in Canada: Moving into the 21st Century , 2007 .

[31]  R. Rosenberg,et al.  Macrobenthic succession in relation to organic enrichment and pollution of the marine environment , 1978 .

[32]  Pat Hutchings,et al.  Overview of integrative tools and methods in assessing ecological integrity in estuarine and coastal systems worldwide. , 2008, Marine pollution bulletin.

[33]  Ángel Borja,et al.  Paradigmatic responses of marine benthic communities to different anthropogenic pressures, using M-AMBI, within the European Water Framework Directive , 2009 .

[34]  Juan Bald,et al.  Implementation of the European water framework directive from the Basque country (northern Spain): a methodological approach. , 2004, Marine pollution bulletin.

[35]  Torsten Berg,et al.  Current status of macroinvertebrate methods used for assessing the quality of European marine waters: implementing the Water Framework Directive , 2009, Hydrobiologia.

[36]  Á. Borja,et al.  Assessing ecological integrity in marine waters, using multiple indices and ecosystem components: challenges for the future. , 2009, Marine pollution bulletin.

[37]  Josette Garnier,et al.  River basin nutrient delivery to the coastal sea : Assessing its potential to sustain new production of non-siliceous algae , 2007 .

[38]  W van de Bund,et al.  Towards good ecological status of surface waters in Europe--interpretation and harmonisation of the concept. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[39]  B. Moss,et al.  The Water Framework Directive: total environment or political compromise? , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[40]  Ibon Galparsoro,et al.  Investigative monitoring within the European Water Framework Directive: a coastal blast furnace slag disposal, as an example. , 2008, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[41]  Michael Elliott,et al.  Ecology of marine sediments : from science to management , 2009 .

[42]  Mats Blomqvist,et al.  Assessment of marine benthic quality change in gradients of disturbance: comparison of different Scandinavian multi-metric indices. , 2009, Marine pollution bulletin.

[43]  P. Henriksen,et al.  Long-term changes in phytoplankton in the Kattegat, the Belt Sea, the Sound and the western Baltic Sea , 2009 .

[44]  Heiskanen Anna-Stiina,et al.  Relationships between Pressures, Chemical Status, and Biological Quality Elements. Analysis of the Current Knowledge Gaps for the Implementation of the Water Framework Directive , 2005 .

[45]  I. Muxika,et al.  The water framework directive: water alone, or in association with sediment and biota, in determining quality standards? , 2004, Marine pollution bulletin.

[46]  Steven Degraer,et al.  Assessing coastal benthic macrofauna community condition using best professional judgement--developing consensus across North America and Europe. , 2010, Marine pollution bulletin.

[47]  M. Elliott,et al.  Management of the marine environment: integrating ecosystem services and societal benefits with the DPSIR framework in a systems approach. , 2011, Marine pollution bulletin.

[48]  The OSPAR system of Ecological Quality Objectives for the North Sea, , 2009 .

[49]  Ibon Galparsoro,et al.  The European Water Framework Directive and the DPSIR, a methodological approach to assess the risk of failing to achieve good ecological status , 2006 .

[50]  Itziar Tueros,et al.  Integrating long-term water and sediment pollution data, in assessing chemical status within the European Water Framework Directive. , 2009, Marine pollution bulletin.

[51]  M. Elliott,et al.  Marine monitoring: Its shortcomings and mismatch with the EU Water Framework Directive's objectives. , 2006, Marine pollution bulletin.

[52]  Ángel Borja,et al.  A Marine Biotic Index to Establish the Ecological Quality of Soft-Bottom Benthos Within European Estuarine and Coastal Environments , 2000 .

[53]  Á. Borja,et al.  Medium- and Long-term Recovery of Estuarine and Coastal Ecosystems: Patterns, Rates and Restoration Effectiveness , 2010 .

[54]  Jon Barry,et al.  Extending the phytoplankton tool kit for the UK Water Framework Directive: indicators of phytoplankton community structure , 2009, Hydrobiologia.

[55]  Richard J. McLaughlin,et al.  Contrasting marine policies in the United States, Mexico, Cuba and the European Union: Searching for an integrated strategy for the Gulf of Mexico region , 2008 .

[56]  Heikki Pitkänen,et al.  Tracing pollution and recovery using sediments in an urban estuary, northern Baltic Sea: are we far from ecological reference conditions? , 2005 .

[57]  Michael Elliott,et al.  European Environmental Management: Moving to an Ecosystem Approach , 2006, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[58]  Ángel Borja,et al.  ASSESSING FISH QUALITY STATUS IN TRANSITIONAL WATERS, WITHIN THE EUROPEAN WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE: SETTING BOUNDARY CLASSES AND RESPONDING TO ANTHROPOGENIC PRESSURES , 2009 .

[59]  Nicholas John Anderson,et al.  Long‐term trends in eutrophication and nutrients in the coastal zone , 2006 .

[60]  H. Browman,et al.  Perspectives on ecosystem-based approaches to the management of marine resources , 2004 .

[61]  Angel Borja,et al.  An approach to the intercalibration of benthic ecological status assessment in the North Atlantic ecoregion, according to the European Water Framework Directive. , 2007, Marine pollution bulletin.

[62]  Simon Jennings,et al.  Testing candidate indicators to support ecosystem-based management: the power of monitoring surveys to detect temporal trends in fish community metrics , 2004 .

[63]  Katherine W. Mcfadden,et al.  Marine ecosystem approaches to management: challenges and lessons in the United States , 2008 .