Responder Analyses for Treatment Effects in COPD Using the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire.

Background: Patient-reported outcomes data in clinical trials are usually reported as mean values, interpreted in comparison to a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) and ignoring the possibility of a sizable proportion of patients experiencing a worthwhile benefit when the majority did not. This analysis tested the reliability of calculated responder rates (from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD] patients) with the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) using a range of responder cut-points above and below the MCID (4 units). Methods: Individual patient data (i.e., data from long-acting bronchodilator [LAB] and inhaled corticosteroids [ICS]/long-acting beta2-agonist [LABA] randomized clinical studies) in the COPD Biomarker Qualification Consortium database were used: short-term (≤1-year duration; 14,814 patients,) and medium-term (2-4 years; 12,043 patients). Responder rates versus placebo across SGRQ score change thresholds ranging from -1.5 to -8.0 were tested; differences were expressed as the odds ratio (OR) of a patient exceeding the threshold versus no change or deterioration. Results: The ORs measuring benefit of active treatment were similar across thresholds in short-term studies (LAB, ORs 1.40-1.42; LABA/ICS, 1.50-1.56) and medium-term LAB studies (ORs 1.34-1.43), whereas ORs in medium-term studies with LABA/ICS intervention showed a trend for higher response rates at higher values of threshold cut-points (1.64-1.79). In short-term studies, different thresholds had little effect on the OR between active drugs versus a trend for lower ORs with lower thresholds in medium-term studies. Conclusions: The OR for a treatment effect compared with placebo appears consistent across a range of responder cut-points. In medium-term trials, the treatment difference between active drugs suggests that use of a lower threshold would not increase the odds of observing a measured treatment difference.

[1]  The COPD Biomarkers Qualification Consortium Database: Baseline Characteristics of the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire Dataset. , 2017, Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases.

[2]  M. R. Siddiqui,et al.  Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) , 2017 .

[3]  M. Cazzola,et al.  A review of the most common patient-reported outcomes in COPD – revisiting current knowledge and estimating future challenges , 2015, International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

[4]  J. Wedzicha,et al.  Minimal clinically important differences in pharmacological trials. , 2014, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[5]  R. Casaburi,et al.  The COPD Biomarker Qualification Consortium (CBQC) , 2013, COPD.

[6]  M. Miravitlles,et al.  Beyond FEV1 in COPD: a review of patient-reported outcomes and their measurement , 2012, International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

[7]  M. Miravitlles,et al.  Beyond FEV 1 in COPD: a review of patient-reported outcomes and their measurement , 2012 .

[8]  P. Calverley,et al.  Bias due to withdrawal in long‐term randomised trials in COPD: Evidence from the TORCH study , 2011, The clinical respiratory journal.

[9]  Liam Ck A 4-year trial of tiotropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. , 2008 .

[10]  Bartolome Celli,et al.  Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate and survival in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  P. Jones,et al.  Outcomes and markers in the assessment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease , 2006, European Respiratory Journal.

[12]  P. Jones St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire: MCID , 2005, COPD.