Modelling organizations' structural adjustment to BIM adoption: a pilot study on estimating organizations

Building information Modelling (BIM) promises a fairly radical revolution in all segments of the construction industry. Vital evidence has been used in many studies to elicit how fragmented processes in conventional construction systems, predominantly manual design systems and entity-based CAD often render design and project performance vulnerable. BIM is presented as having attributes that strengthen the frameworks for servicing efficiency in design and project performance. As BIM adoption continues to improve, various stake-holding practices that are involved in developing projects through integrated systems do require process models to help them simplify issues relating to multi-disciplinary integration – a direct opposite of what they are used to in fragmented systems. They also need to develop appropriate skills and strategies, including new marketing and administrative stratagems, to service intensive collaboration and other ethos of BIM. These are some of the inevitable changes to which organizations must respond in order to generate efficient results when adopting and deploying BIM. To examine organizational response to those process changes as promised in BIM, different organization models are explored with emphasis on their functional structures, namely: (1) matrix (2) networked (3) functional (4) divisional structure models. Data were collected from 8 construction and software development organizations in Australia through focus group discussions. 18 participants in core BIM skills took part in the study. Some interesting discoveries were made and reported on the industry’s reactions to BIM adoption. Conclusively, this study confirms the nature and direction of potential changes that BIM trigger.

[1]  L. Sailer Structural equivalence: Meaning and definition, computation and application , 1978 .

[2]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organization Theory and Design , 1983 .

[3]  Tim Cornick,et al.  A study of the contractor's quantity surveying practice during the construction process , 1994 .

[4]  Blake Ives,et al.  The Global Network Organization of the Future: Information Management Opportunities and Challenges , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Chimay J. Anumba Functional integration in CAD systems , 1996 .

[6]  Craig Langston,et al.  Information Technology and the Evolution of the Quantity Surveying Profession - Future Directions , 1996 .

[7]  Sherif Ali Mohtady Mohamed,et al.  Options for applying BPR in the Australian construction industry , 1996 .

[8]  R. Teare,et al.  A systems model of effective teamwork , 1997 .

[9]  Gora Beye,et al.  Management of agricultural research : a training manual / Bulletin 696 , 1997 .

[10]  Marshall W. van Alstyne,et al.  The State of Network Organization: A Survey in Three Frameworks , 1997, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[11]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Competing by design: the power of organizational architecture , 1998 .

[12]  Peter E. D. Love,et al.  From BPR to CPR - conceptualising re-engineering in construction , 1998, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[13]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Network Structure in Virtual Organizations , 1999 .

[14]  Jennifer Whyte,et al.  From CAD to virtual reality : modelling approaches, data exchange and interactive 3D building design tools , 2000 .

[15]  Nm Bouchlaghem,et al.  From CAD to virtual reality: standards, data exchange and interactive 3D building design tools , 2000 .

[16]  Kai Reimers Standardizing the New E-Business Platform: Learning From the EDI Experience , 2001, Electron. Mark..

[17]  Yehuda E. Kalay,et al.  Enhancing multi-disciplinary collaboration through semantically rich representation , 2001 .

[18]  Duncan P. Cartlidge,et al.  New Aspects of Quantity Surveying Practice , 2002 .

[19]  J. Poon,et al.  Professional ethics for surveyors and construction project performance: what we need to know , 2003 .

[20]  Martin Skitmore,et al.  The integration between design and maintenance of office building automation : a decision support approach , 2003 .

[21]  Jahau Lewis Chen,et al.  The conflict-problem-solving CAD software integrating TRIZ into eco-innovation , 2004 .

[22]  R. Nkado,et al.  COMPETENCIES REQUIRED BY QUANTITY SURVEYORS IN SOUTH AFRICA , 2005 .

[23]  Young-Dai Lee,et al.  DESIGN ERRORS: TRAGIC FOR THE CLIENTS , 2006 .

[24]  Martin Skitmore,et al.  Diagnosing the organisational culture of an Australian engineering consultancy using the competing values framework , 2006 .

[25]  Wen-der Yu,et al.  A WICE approach to real-time construction cost estimation , 2006 .

[26]  Yimin Zhu,et al.  Applying metadata models to unstructured content of construction documents: A view-based approach , 2007 .

[27]  Fletcher Griffis Building information model in the management of construction , 2007 .

[28]  Robin Drogemuller,et al.  Towards digital facility modelling for Sydney opera house using IFC and semantic web technology , 2007, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[29]  Dominic Holzer,et al.  ARE YOU TALKING TO ME? WHY BIM ALONE IS NOT THE ANSWER , 2007 .

[30]  Leonas Ustinovichius,et al.  Classification of the Investment Risk in Construction , 2007, CDVE.

[31]  Jason Underwood,et al.  Going BIM in a commercial world , 2008 .

[32]  Y. Arayici,et al.  Digital Construction through BIM Systems will Drive the Re-engineering of Construction Business Practices , 2008, 2008 International Conference Visualisation.

[33]  Alan Hore,et al.  CITAX: a Collaborative ICT Standards Model for the Irish Construction Industry , 2008 .

[34]  Ghang Lee,et al.  Editorial - Case studies of BIM in use , 2008, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[35]  H. Ashcraft Building Information Modeling : A Framework for Collaboration , 2008 .

[36]  Ljiljana Brankovic,et al.  BUILDING INFORMATION MODELLING PROJECT DECISION SUPPORT FRAMEWORK , 2008 .

[37]  Salman Azhar,et al.  Building Information Modeling ( BIM ) : Benefits , Risks and Challenges , 2008 .

[38]  Bilal Succar,et al.  Building information modelling framework: A research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders , 2009 .

[39]  Anthony Williams,et al.  Heading into new virtual environments: what skills do design team members need? , 2009, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[40]  Willy Sher,et al.  Building information modeling and quantity surveying practice , 2010 .

[41]  Paul Bowen,et al.  Value management practice by South African quantity surveyors , 2010 .

[42]  John Henderson,et al.  Building Information Modelling , 2010 .

[43]  Willy Sher,et al.  Modelling outcomes of collaboration in building information modelling through gaming theory lenses , 2010 .

[44]  Marianne Forman,et al.  Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM) , 2011 .