Effect of channel restoration on flood wave attenuation.

Stream channel restoration can increase flow storage and energy dissipation of passing flood waves. Elements of restoration design that can enhance attenuation include remeandering, which reduces channel slope and increases channel length relative to the floodplain; restoring channel-floodplain connectivity; and revegetating banks and the floodplain. Reestablishment of floodplain hydraulic function is increasingly a goal of restoration programs, yet the approximate magnitude of possible change to attenuation due to reach-scale restoration remains poorly quantified. We examined the efficacy of channel restoration on flood attenuation using restored reaches and synthetic reaches representing median dimensions of channel restoration projects in North Carolina e.g., 1 km in length . We applied an industry standard dynamic flood routing model UNET in HEC-RAS to route floods in impaired and restored reach models. Floods routed through field-based reach models either exhibited very small increases in attenuation, largely due to assumed increases in floodplain roughness, or a decrease in attenuation. Analysis demonstrated that attenuation of peak discharge is overall most sensitive to channel and valley slope, channel and floodplain roughness, and channel and valley length in decreasing order, but is dependent on flood magnitude. Restoration most impacted floods of intermediate magnitude between 2and 50-year return interval , particularly those confined to the channel under the impaired morphology but able to access the floodplain under the restored morphology. Restoration may rehabilitate a channel’s ability to attenuate small to intermediate floods by augmenting flood access to the floodplain, changing channel geometry, and enhancing channel and floodplain roughness over time. However, our study shows that the predominantly small scale of current channel restoration will provide minimally quantifiable enhancement to flood attenuation. DOI: 10.1061/ ASCE HY.1943-7900.0000294 CE Database subject headings: Channels; Restoration; Wave attenuation; Flood routing; Hydraulic models. Author keywords: Channel restoration; Flood attenuation; Flood routing; One-dimensional hydraulic models.

[1]  D. Booth.  STREAM‐CHANNEL INCISION FOLLOWING DRAINAGE‐BASIN URBANIZATION , 1990 .

[2]  Tim D. Fletcher,et al.  Stream restoration in urban catchments through redesigning stormwater systems: looking to the catchment to save the stream , 2005, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[3]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Attenuating reaches and the regional flood response of an urbanizing drainage basin , 2003 .

[4]  André Paquier,et al.  Effect of roughened strips on flood propagation: Assessment on representative virtual cases and validation , 2006 .

[5]  D. Knight.  River flood hydraulics: validation issues in one-dimensional flood routing models , 2005 .

[6]  A. Ladson,et al.  Improving stream health in urban areas by reducing runoff frequency from impervious surfaces , 2006 .

[7]  B. Wyżga.  CHANGES IN THE MAGNITUDE AND TRANSFORMATION OF FLOOD WAVES SUBSEQUENT TO THE CHANNELIZATION OF THE RABA RIVER, POLISH CARPATHIANS , 1996 .

[8]  J. Meyer,et al.  Restoring Rivers One Reach at a Time: Results from a Survey of U.S. River Restoration Practitioners , 2007 .

[9]  Lucien Hoffmann,et al.  Simulation of flood reduction by natural river rehabilitation using a distributed hydrological model , 2004 .

[10]  D. J. Booker,et al.  Hydrological impacts of floodplain restoration: a case study of the River Cherwell, UK , 2003 .

[11]  F. Douglas Shields,et al.  PREDICTION OF EFFECTS OF WOODY DEBRIS REMOVAL ON FLOW RESISTANCE , 1995 .

[12]  Todd BenDor,et al.  Landscape characteristics of a stream and wetland mitigation banking program. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[13]  C. Woltemade,et al.  A watershed modeling analysis of fluvial geomorphologic influences on flood peak attenuation , 1994 .

[14]  D. Knight,et al.  Energy losses due to secondary flow and turbulence in meandering channels with overbank flows , 1999 .

[15]  Howard P. Johnson,et al.  Stream Straightening Effects on Flood-Runoff Characteristics , 1972 .

[16]  Robert G. Traver,et al.  Closure of "Watershed-Scale Evaluation of a System of Storm Water Detention Basins" , 2005 .

[17]  D. L. Fread,et al.  COMPUTATION OF STAGE‐DISCHARGE RELATIONSHIPS AFFECTED BY UNSTEADY FLOW , 1975 .

[18]  Y. Fares.  Calculation of transverse energy regime in curved channels , 2000 .

[19]  D. Shankman,et al.  Discharge response to channelization of a coastal plain stream , 1992, Wetlands.

[20]  Cheryl C Harrelson,et al.  Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated Guide to Field Technique , 1994 .

[21]  Stephen J. Burges,et al.  An analysis of the influence of river channel properties on flood frequency , 1994 .

[22]  William A. Harman,et al.  HYDRAULIC GEOMETRY RELATIONSHIPS FOR URBAN STREAMS THROUGHOUT THE PIEDMONT OF NORTH CAROLINA 1 , 2002 .

[23]  Robert L. Barkau,et al.  UNET: One-Dimensional Unsteady Flow Through a Full Network of Open Channels. User's Manual, , 1996 .

[24]  A. W. Western,et al.  An analysis of the influence of riparian vegetation on the propagation of flood waves , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[25]  F. D. Shields,et al.  A GEOMORPHOLOGICAL APPROACH TO RESTORATION OF INCISED RIVERS , 2007 .