Seeing the bigger picture: Context-aware regulations

The TV whitespaces represent an incredible opportunity for innovation. Along with this opportunity come significant challenges: the whitespaces are very heterogeneous in terms of channel availability as well as quality. This poses a challenge to anyone wishing to achieve uniform or even similar quality of service nationwide. In this paper, we consider using heterogeneity in the emissions limits to counteract the inherent heterogeneity of the whitespaces, ultimately resulting in a more homogeneous quality of service for secondary users. However, heterogeneity cannot be added to regulations in a haphazard manner. Rather, it must be carefully crafted as a result of looking at the bigger picture and fully exploiting the capabilities of databases. Databases should not be seen as a necessary evil but rather as an exciting opportunity for improvement and innovation. In particular, rather than being viewed as a simple repository of data, the “database” can be viewed as a cloud-based entity that reports the result of a default kind of Coasian-bargaining that could be expected to occur among frequency-agile radios. We conclude by showing a few small examples of positive heterogeneity as it applies to real-world data for the TV whitespaces in parts of the United States.

[1]  Maziar Nekovee,et al.  Quantifying the Availability of TV White Spaces for Cognitive Radio Operation in the UK , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops.

[2]  Kalle Ruttik,et al.  Aggregate interference with FCC and ECC white space usage rules: Case study in Finland , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN).

[3]  Mieczyslaw M. Kokar,et al.  Language Issues for Cognitive Radio , 2009, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[4]  Anant Sahai,et al.  Potential collapse of whitespaces and the prospect for a universal power rule , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN).

[5]  Anant Sahai,et al.  Near vs. Far Field: Interference Aggregation in TV Whitespaces , 2011, 2011 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference - GLOBECOM 2011.

[6]  Danny H. K. Tsang,et al.  Impact of Channel Heterogeneity on Spectrum Sharing in Cognitive Radio Networks , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[7]  Andreas Achtzehn,et al.  UHF white space in Europe — A quantitative study into the potential of the 470–790 MHz band , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN).

[8]  Kate Harrison,et al.  How Much White-Space Capacity Is There? , 2010, 2010 IEEE Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum (DySPAN).

[9]  Haitao Zheng,et al.  Collaboration and fairness in opportunistic spectrum access , 2005, IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2005. ICC 2005. 2005.

[10]  Metin Kaplan,et al.  A dynamic spectrum decision scheme for heterogeneous cognitive radio networks , 2009, 2009 24th International Symposium on Computer and Information Sciences.

[11]  A. Sahai,et al.  How much white space is there ? , 2009 .

[12]  J. Grosspietsch,et al.  Geo-Location Database Techniques for Incumbent Protection in the TV White Space , 2008, 2008 3rd IEEE Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks.