The social dynamics of diverse and closed networks

Inherent to the dynamics of social networks is a paradoxical trade-off between closed networks that promote cooper- ation and efficiency and diverse networks that are flexible to new resources and ideas. Since actors cannot simultaneously max- imize both facets of a network, this has created a sharp debate on the social capital performance of closed and diverse network relationships. Research on this social capital debate has often focused on these described network affects without explaining the origins and dynamics of network performance. This paper advances a cognitive diversity approach that is based upon the subjec- tive and alert behaviors of Austrian entrepreneurs. These are key causal drivers to this paper's theoretical model of social dynam- ics and performance of closed and diverse networks. Such network behavior is subsequently modeled as a Complex Adaptive system. Using agent-based simulation, an agent-based model of entrepreneurship and social network dynamics is constructed to test the relationships described by the proposed theoretical model. The simulation results support the described hypothesized relationships. These findings also suggest the benefits of closed and diverse networks are logically distinct and, thus, should not be viewed as an either-or phenomenon. Agent-based simulation results show entrepreneurs can construct a balanced network of closed and diverse networks to optimize the benefits of both networks.

[1]  Robert Jacobson,et al.  The “Austrian” School of Strategy , 1992 .

[2]  H. Thomas,et al.  Rivalry and the Industry Model of Scottish Knitwear Producers , 1995 .

[3]  S. Shane Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities , 2000 .

[4]  W. Powell,et al.  Networks and Economic life , 2003 .

[5]  E. Jantsch The self-organizing universe : scientific and human implications of the emerging paradigm of evolution , 1980 .

[6]  C. Shalley,et al.  The Social Side of Creativity: A Static and Dynamic Social Network Perspective , 2003 .

[7]  A. Knott Persistent heterogeneity and sustainable innovation , 2003 .

[8]  J. M. McPherson,et al.  Social Networks and Organizational Dynamics , 1992 .

[9]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  Networks, Diversity, and Productivity: The Social Capital of Corporate R&D Teams , 2001 .

[10]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[11]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  R. Grant,et al.  Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 2022 .

[13]  Israel M. Kirzner The Driving Force of the Market: Essays in Austrian Economics , 2000 .

[14]  Nicholas Kalaitzandonakes,et al.  Vertical and Horizontal Coordination in the Agro-biotechnology Industry: Evidence and Implications , 1997, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[15]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change , 1990 .

[16]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[17]  Martin Gargiulo,et al.  Trapped in Your Own Net? Network Cohesion, Structural Holes, and the Adaptation of Social Capital , 2000 .

[18]  Mark S. Granovetter T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[19]  David A. Lane,et al.  Artificial worlds and economics, part I , 1993 .

[20]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[21]  Ajay Mehra,et al.  Top Management-Team Diversity and Firm Performance: Examining the Role of Cognitions , 2000 .

[22]  B. Lawrence The Black Box of Organizational Demography , 1997 .

[23]  R. Burt The contingent value of social capital. , 1997 .