Time dilation effect in an active observer and virtual environment requires apparent motion: No dilation for retinal- or world-motion alone.

It is known that moving visual stimuli are perceived to last longer than stationary stimuli with the same physical duration (Kanai, Paffen, Hogendoorn, & Verstraten, 2006), and that motor actions (Tomassini & Morrone, 2016) and eye movements (Morrone, Ross, & Burr, 2005) can alter perceived duration. In the present work, we investigated the contributions of stimulus motion and self-motion to perceived duration while observers stood or walked in a virtual reality environment. Using a visual temporal reproduction task, we independently manipulated both the participants' motion (stationary or walking) and the stimulus motion (retinal stationary, real-world stationary and negative double velocity). When the observers were standing still, drifting gratings were perceived as lasting longer than duration-matched static gratings. Interestingly, we did not see any time distortion when observers were walking, neither when the gratings were kept stationary relative to the observer's point of view (i.e., no retinal motion) nor when they were stationary in the external world (i.e., producing the same retinal velocity as the walking condition with stationary grating). Self-motion caused significant dilation in perceived duration only when the gratings were moving at double speed, opposite to the observers' walking direction. Consistent with previous work (Fornaciai, Arrighi, & Burr, 2016), this suggests that the system is able to suppress self-generated motion to enhance external motion, which would have ecological benefits, for example, for threat detection while navigating through the environment.

[1]  Michael N. Shadlen,et al.  Temporal context calibrates interval timing , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  Krista M. Gigone,et al.  Perception of visual speed while moving. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  David C. Burr,et al.  Adaptation-Induced Compression of Event Time Occurs Only for Translational Motion , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[4]  M Concetta Morrone,et al.  Saccadic eye movements cause compression of time as well as space , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  Monica Gori,et al.  Perceived duration of Visual and Tactile Stimuli Depends on Perceived Speed , 2011, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[6]  Ryota Kanai,et al.  Time dilation in dynamic visual display. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[7]  Scott W. Brown Time, change, and motion: The effects of stimulus movement on temporal perception , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  M Concetta Morrone,et al.  Neural mechanisms for timing visual events are spatially selective in real-world coordinates , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  Derek H. Arnold,et al.  Spatially Localized Distortions of Event Time , 2006, Current Biology.

[10]  L. Harris,et al.  Moving and the motion after-effect , 1981, Nature.

[11]  Kayo Miura,et al.  Time dilation caused by static images with implied motion , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  Alexander C. Schütz,et al.  Compression of time during smooth pursuit eye movements , 2010, Vision Research.

[13]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[14]  D. Burr,et al.  Optimal Encoding of Interval Timing in Expert Percussionists , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  M. Treisman,et al.  The Internal Clock: Evidence for a Temporal Oscillator Underlying Time Perception with Some Estimates of its Characteristic Frequency , 1990, Perception.

[16]  Ikuya Murakami,et al.  Perceived duration of visual motion increases with speed. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[17]  M. Morrone,et al.  Perceived visual time depends on motor preparation and direction of hand movements , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[18]  Roberto Arrighi,et al.  Spatiotopic selectivity of adaptation-based compression of event duration. , 2011, Journal of vision.