Exemestane and Everolimus combination treatment of hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer: A retrospective study of 9 cancer centers in the Campania Region (Southern Italy) focused on activity, efficacy and safety

Exemestane (Exe) in combination with Everolimus (Eve) represents an important treatment option for patients diagnosed with hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), which was previously treated with non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAI). Data from unselected populations may be useful for defining the optimal therapeutic algorithm within a clinical setting. Data from 264 HR+, HER2-MBC patients who received Exe-Eve treatment in combination, following the failure of NSAIs was retrospectively analyzed. Different lines of endocrine treatment (ET) were investigated to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the treatment within the ‘everyday clinical practice’ population. The disease control rate (DCR) was 73.1%, with no statistically significant difference among the different settings. At a median follow-up of 42 months, the median progression free survival (PFS) was 11.6, 9.7 and 7.5 months for patients treated with Exe-Eve as first, second or third line therapy, respectively. There was a statistically significant correlation with younger age, no previous adjuvant chemotherapy (CT), no previous adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET), HT duration ≥36 months, involvement of liver and/or lung, no prior CT for metastatic disease and PS=0 at the start of treatment. The median overall survival (OS) was 33.0 months; at a median follow-up of 67 months, the median OS was 43.1, 31.7 and 27.9 months in patients treated with Exe-Eve in first, second or third line therapy, respectively. On multivariate analysis, diabetes and previous CT for metastatic disease were revealed to correlate with a worse outcome. Conversely, the presence of mucositis was significantly associated with long-term survival. Overall, Exe-Eve was typically well tolerated and the majority toxicities were G1 or 2, while treatment discontinuation due to unacceptable toxicity was only required in 5.7% of patients. Despite the limitations due to the observational nature of this study, the findings suggest that treatment with Exe-Eve is an active and safe therapeutic option for endocrine-sensitive MBC patients in a real-world clinical setting, regardless of treatment lines.

[1]  P. Neven,et al.  MONARCH 2: Abemaciclib in Combination With Fulvestrant in Women With HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer Who Had Progressed While Receiving Endocrine Therapy. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  M. Chambers,et al.  Prevention of everolimus-related stomatitis in women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer using dexamethasone mouthwash (SWISH): a single-arm, phase 2 trial. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[3]  A. Tutt,et al.  3rd ESO–ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 3) , 2016, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[4]  P. Marchetti,et al.  Safety analysis, association with response and previous treatments of everolimus and exemestane in 181 metastatic breast cancer patients: A multicenter Italian experience. , 2016, Breast.

[5]  P. Neven,et al.  Safety of everolimus plus exemestane in patients with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer progressing on prior non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors: primary results of a phase IIIb, open-label, single-arm, expanded-access multicenter trial (BALLET). , 2016, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[6]  S. Loi,et al.  Fulvestrant plus palbociclib versus fulvestrant plus placebo for treatment of hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy (PALOMA-3): final analysis of the multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[7]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Meta-analysis of stomatitis in clinical studies of everolimus: incidence and relationship with efficacy , 2016, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[8]  C. Mathers,et al.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012 , 2015, International journal of cancer.

[9]  P. Neven,et al.  Everolimus plus exemestane for hormone-receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative advanced breast cancer: overall survival results from BOLERO-2†. , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[10]  M. Piccart,et al.  Erratum to: Everolimus Plus Exemestane in Postmenopausal Patients with HR+ Breast Cancer: BOLERO-2 Final Progression-Free Survival Analysis , 2014, Advances in Therapy.

[11]  M. Piccart,et al.  Incidence and time course of everolimus-related adverse events in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer: insights from BOLERO-2 , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[12]  P. Neven,et al.  Health‐related quality of life of patients with advanced breast cancer treated with everolimus plus exemestane versus placebo plus exemestane in the phase 3, randomized, controlled, BOLERO‐2 trial , 2013, Cancer.

[13]  I. Ray-Coquard,et al.  Randomized phase II trial of everolimus in combination with tamoxifen in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer with prior exposure to aromatase inhibitors: a GINECO study. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  M. Piccart,et al.  Everolimus in postmenopausal hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  Rachel Schiff,et al.  Mechanisms of endocrine resistance in breast cancer. , 2011, Annual review of medicine.

[16]  R. Greil,et al.  Phase II randomized study of neoadjuvant everolimus plus letrozole compared with placebo plus letrozole in patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  Shiuan Chen,et al.  Dual Inhibition of mTOR and Estrogen Receptor Signaling In vitro Induces Cell Death in Models of Breast Cancer , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[18]  Nilanjan Chatterjee,et al.  Estrogen Receptor Breast Cancer Phenotypes in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database , 2002, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[19]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[20]  Massimo Cristofanilli,et al.  Palbociclib in Hormone-Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  D. Brizel,et al.  National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology , 2012 .