Automated Target Detection for Geophysical Applications

In many geophysical surveys, there is a predefined goal—to detect and locate very specific anomalies, those that correspond to buried objects (targets). The types of targets range from various types of pipes (metallic or not), to rebars or wires in walls to land mines. This paper presents a novel unsupervised method for automatically detecting targets, and extracting information about them and the medium in which they reside. Most existing detection methods are supervised, which means that one has to provide a training set (which can be labor expensive) in order to train a classifier. By contrast, the method presented here is unsupervised and is model based, which alleviates the need to manually annotate a training set. Another drawback of many existing methods is the underlying assumption of a homogeneous medium. This assumption is greatly relaxed for this method, since it assumes no a priori knowledge of the medium. Instead, it learns the medium’s properties from the targets themselves. Furthermore, our method is designed to be computationally efficient and applicable in real-time applications. It was implemented on the StructureScan Mini XT system (Geophysical Survey Systems, Inc.), and the runtime on that system was measured to be $20~\mu \text{s}$ per scan of 512 samples. Experiments on 50 ground penetrating radar images with 278 targets show that our method is able to detect the targets with high positioning accuracy, with a 95.3% detection rate and near-zero false alarm rate.

[1]  Vladik Kreinovich,et al.  Why Ricker wavelets are successful in processing seismic data: Towards a theoretical explanation , 2014, 2014 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Engineering Solutions (CIES).

[2]  Farid Melgani,et al.  Automatic Analysis of GPR Images: A Pattern-Recognition Approach , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  R. Yelf,et al.  Where is true time zero ? , 2004, Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Grounds Penetrating Radar, 2004. GPR 2004..

[4]  Raffaele Persico,et al.  Automated Detection of Reflection Hyperbolas in Complex GPR Images With No A Priori Knowledge on the Medium , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  J. Daniels,et al.  Ground penetrating radar polarization and scattering from cylinders , 2000 .

[6]  Nur Yazdani,et al.  An Experimental and Numerical Study on Embedded Rebar Diameter in Concrete Using Ground Penetrating Radar , 2016 .

[7]  V. Utsi,et al.  Measurement of reinforcement bar depths and diameters in concrete , 2004, Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Grounds Penetrating Radar, 2004. GPR 2004..

[8]  Rayn Terin Tatsuma Sakaguchi,et al.  Image Processing Methods Applied to Landmine Detection in Ground Penetrating Radar , 2013 .

[9]  Yasuhisa Hasegawa,et al.  Advances in GPR-based landmine automatic detection , 2011, J. Frankl. Inst..

[10]  M. Wistuba,et al.  Crack detection in asphalt pavements - How useful is the GPR? , 2011, 2011 6th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR).

[11]  Erez N. Allouche,et al.  Numerical modeling and experimental evaluation of a time domain UWB technique for soil void detection , 2010 .

[12]  James H. McClellan,et al.  Feature detection algorithms in computed images , 2008 .

[13]  Carey M. Rappaport Accurate Determination of Underground GPR Wavefront and B-Scan Shape From Above-Ground Point Sources , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[14]  Mansor Nakhkash,et al.  Automatic detection of buried utilities and solid objects with GPR using neural networks and pattern recognition , 2000 .

[15]  Laura E. Ray,et al.  Crevasse Detection in Ice Sheets Using Ground Penetrating Radar and Machine Learning , 2014, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[16]  MengChu Zhou,et al.  Automatic Detection of Bridge Deck Condition From Ground Penetrating Radar Images , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[17]  Bhaskar Sangoju ESTIMATION OF REBAR DIAMETER IN CONCRETE STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS USING GROUND PENETRATING RADAR , 2017 .

[18]  Luigi Zanzi,et al.  Sensitivity and accuracy in rebar diameter measurements from dual-polarized GPR data , 2013 .

[19]  Yumin Vincent Kang,et al.  Application of Ground Penetrating Radar to Identify Shallow Cavities in a Coastal Dyke , 2013 .

[20]  Hwanjo Yu SVMC: Single-Class Classification With Support Vector Machines , 2003, IJCAI.

[21]  Ali Cafer Gürbüz,et al.  Feature detection algorithms in computed images , 2008 .

[22]  Stanley Radzevicius,et al.  Least-squares curve fitting for velocity and time zero , 2015, 2015 8th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR).

[23]  Riafeni Karlina Compressive Sensing Applied to High Resolution Imaging by Synthetic Aperture Radar , 2013 .

[24]  H. S. Lien,et al.  Measurement radius of reinforcing steel bar in concrete using digital image GPR , 2009 .

[25]  S. Shihab,et al.  Radius Estimation for Cylindrical Objects Detected by Ground Penetrating Radar , 2005 .

[26]  Chunlin Huang,et al.  Identifying underground voids using a GPR circular-end bow-tie antenna system based on a support vector machine , 2016 .

[27]  Fathi E. Abd El-Samie,et al.  Detection of landmines and underground utilities from acoustic and GPR images with a cepstral approach , 2010, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[28]  Leslie M. Collins,et al.  Multiple-Instance Hidden Markov Model for GPR-Based Landmine Detection , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[29]  Ali Cafer Gürbüz,et al.  Compressive sensing for subsurface imaging using ground penetrating radar , 2009, Signal Process..

[30]  M. M. Mokji,et al.  Automatic target detection in GPR images using Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG) , 2014, 2014 2nd International Conference on Electronic Design (ICED).

[31]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods , 2000 .

[32]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[33]  S. Shihab,et al.  Data fusion for accurate characterisation of buried cylindrical objects using GPR , 2004, Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Grounds Penetrating Radar, 2004. GPR 2004..