Influence of foveal distractors on saccadic eye movements: A dead zone for the global effect

Three experiments investigated the global effect with foveal distractors displayed in the same hemifield as more eccentric saccade targets. Distractors were x-letter strings of variable length and targets corresponded to the central letter of letter strings (e.g., 'xxxkxxx'). Results showed that only foveal distractors longer than four letters (about 1 degree) deviated the eyes in a center-of-gravity manner thus suggesting a dead zone for the global effect. Short distractors influenced the likelihood of small-amplitude saccades (less than about 1 degree) and the latency of longer saccades. The findings were interpreted based on the dissociation between fixation and saccadic neurons. Implications for eye movements in reading were discussed.

[1]  A Straube,et al.  Differential effect of a distractor on primary saccades and perceptual localization , 2002, Vision Research.

[2]  P. H. Schiller,et al.  Express averaging saccades in monkeys , 1999, Vision Research.

[3]  J. Findlay Global visual processing for saccadic eye movements , 1982, Vision Research.

[4]  Milan Vego,et al.  Center of Gravity , 2000 .

[5]  Ariane Levy Schoen Détermination et latence de la réponse oculomotrice à deux stimulus simultanés ou successifs selon leur excentricité relative , 1969 .

[6]  J T McIlwain,et al.  Distributed spatial coding in the superior colliculus: A review , 1991, Visual Neuroscience.

[7]  Valerie Brown,et al.  Eye scanning of multi-element displays: II. Saccade planning , 2006, Vision Research.

[8]  G. McConkie,et al.  Chapter 4 – Determinants of Fixation Positions in Words During Reading , 1998 .

[9]  H D Crane,et al.  Accurate two-dimensional eye tracker using first and fourth Purkinje images. , 1973, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[10]  D. Henson Corrective saccades: Effects of altering visual feedback , 1978, Vision Research.

[11]  Françoise Vitu,et al.  The existence of a center of gravity effect during reading , 1991, Vision Research.

[12]  D. Robinson,et al.  Saccadic undershoot is not inevitable: Saccades can be accurate , 1986, Vision Research.

[13]  Eugene McSorley,et al.  Saccade target selection in visual search: accuracy improves when more distractors are present. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[14]  R. Klein,et al.  A Model of Saccade Initiation Based on the Competitive Integration of Exogenous and Endogenous Signals in the Superior Colliculus , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  J. Rovamo,et al.  Cortical magnification factor predicts the photopic contrast sensitivity of peripheral vision , 1978, Nature.

[16]  F. Vitu,et al.  Eye movements in reading isolated words: evidence for strong biases towards the center of the screen , 2004, Vision Research.

[17]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  Localization of shapes: eye movements and perception compared , 2003, Vision Research.

[18]  F. Plum Handbook of Physiology. , 1960 .

[19]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. , 2005, Psychological review.

[20]  J. Stern Theoretical and applied aspects of eye movement research A. G. Gale and F. Johnson, (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, 1984) pp. xiii + 565, Dfl. 185 , 1985, Biological Psychology.

[21]  P. W. Kerr,et al.  Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words , 1987, Vision Research.

[22]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Why Look? Reasons for Eye Movements Related to Language Production. , 2004 .

[23]  A. Lévy-schoen Détermination et latence de la réponse oculomotrice à deux stimulus simultanés ou successifs selon leur excentricité relative , 1969 .

[24]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Fixation cells in monkey superior colliculus. I. Characteristics of cell discharge. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  J M Findlay,et al.  Spatial Scale and Saccade Programming , 1997, Perception.

[26]  W. Becker The control of eye movements in the saccadic system. , 1972, Bibliotheca ophthalmologica : supplementa ad ophthalmologica.

[27]  F. Vitu The basic assumptions of E-Z Reader are not well-founded , 2003, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[28]  P. Viviani,et al.  Saccadic eye movements to peripherally discriminated visual targets. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  Françoise Vitu,et al.  Dynamic coding of saccade length in reading , 2007 .

[30]  J. Findlay Saccade Target Selection During Visual Search , 1997, Vision Research.

[31]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  The role of location probability in the programming of saccades: Implications for “center-of-gravity” tendencies , 1989, Vision Research.

[32]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Programming of endogenous and exogenous saccades: evidence for a competitive integration model. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  John M. Findlay,et al.  The spatial signal for saccadic eye movements emphasizes visual boundaries , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  Saccadic localization of random dot targets , 1998, Vision Research.

[35]  Arthur M. Jacobs,et al.  On localization and saccade programming , 1987, Vision Research.

[36]  J. Findlay,et al.  Active Vision: The Psychology of Looking and Seeing , 2003 .

[37]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Mindless reading: Eye-movement characteristics are similar in scanning letter strings and reading texts , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  N. J. Gandhi,et al.  Two-dimensional saccade-related population activity in superior colliculus in monkey. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  Robert M. McPeek,et al.  Properties of saccadic responses in monkey when multiple competing visual stimuli are present. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  George W. McConkie,et al.  Saccade generation during reading: Are words necessary? , 2004 .

[41]  G. McConkie,et al.  Eye movements during reading: a theory of saccade initiation times , 2001, Vision Research.

[42]  Christian Coëffé,et al.  Reducing the influence of non-target stimuli on saccade accuracy: Predictability and latency effects , 1987, Vision Research.

[43]  S. Coren,et al.  Effect of Non-Target Stimuli upon Length of Voluntary Saccades , 1972, Perceptual and motor skills.

[44]  W. Wolf,et al.  The Evaluation of the Oculomotor Error Signal , 1984 .

[45]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Fixation location effects on fixation durations during reading: an inverted optimal viewing position effect , 2001, Vision Research.

[46]  R. Walker,et al.  A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[47]  J M Findlay,et al.  Short Report: Scrutinization, Spatial Attention, and the Spatial Programming of Saccadic Eye Movements , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[48]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect , 2005, Vision Research.

[49]  Robin L. Hill,et al.  Eye movements : a window on mind and brain , 2007 .

[50]  H. Deubel,et al.  Effect of remote distractors on saccade programming: evidence for an extended fixation zone. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[51]  D. Sparks,et al.  Population coding of saccadic eye movements by neurons in the superior colliculus , 1988, Nature.

[52]  F. Vitu,et al.  A perceptual-economy account for the inverted-optimal viewing position effect. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  Ronan G. Reilly,et al.  Chapter 21 – Foundations of an Interactive Activation Model of Eye Movement Control in Reading , 2003 .

[54]  M. Pickering,et al.  Eye guidance in reading and scene perception , 1998 .

[55]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[56]  F. Ottes,et al.  Latency dependence of colour-based target vs nontarget discrimination by the saccadic system , 1985, Vision Research.

[57]  Françoise Vitu,et al.  Against the existence of a range effect during reading , 1991, Vision Research.

[58]  F. Ottes,et al.  Metrics of saccade responses to visual double stimuli: Two different modes , 1984, Vision Research.

[59]  D. Balota,et al.  The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[60]  Z. Kapoula,et al.  Evidence for a range effect in the saccadic system , 1985, Vision Research.

[61]  N J Gandhi,et al.  Comparison of saccades perturbed by stimulation of the rostral superior colliculus, the caudal superior colliculus, and the omnipause neuron region. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[62]  P. E. Hallett,et al.  Retinal eccentricity and the latency of eye saccades , 1994, Vision Research.

[63]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models , 2003, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[64]  V. Benson The influence of complex distractors in the remote distractor paradigm , 2008 .

[65]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Optimal landing position in reading isolated words and continuous text , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[66]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Fixation cells in monkey superior colliculus. II. Reversible activation and deactivation. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[67]  Jillian H. Fecteau,et al.  Vying for dominance: dynamic interactions control visual fixation and saccadic initiation in the superior colliculus. , 2002, Progress in brain research.