Evaluation of the predicted error of the soil moisture retrieval from C-band SAR by comparison against modelled soil moisture estimates over Australia

The Sentinel-1 will carry onboard a C-band radar instrument that will map the European continent once every four days and the global land surface at least once every twelve days with finest 5 × 20 m spatial resolution. The high temporal sampling rate and operational configuration make Sentinel-1 of interest for operational soil moisture monitoring. Currently, updated soil moisture data are made available at 1 km spatial resolution as a demonstration service using Global Mode (GM) measurements from the Advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar (ASAR) onboard ENVISAT. The service demonstrates the potential of the C-band observations to monitor variations in soil moisture. Importantly, a retrieval error estimate is also available; these are needed to assimilate observations into models. The retrieval error is estimated by propagating sensor errors through the retrieval model. In this work, the existing ASAR GM retrieval error product is evaluated using independent top soil moisture estimates produced by the grid-based landscape hydrological model (AWRA-L) developed within the Australian Water Resources Assessment system (AWRA). The ASAR GM retrieval error estimate, an assumed prior AWRA-L error estimate and the variance in the respective datasets were used to spatially predict the root mean square error (RMSE) and the Pearson's correlation coefficient R between the two datasets. These were compared with the RMSE calculated directly from the two datasets. The predicted and computed RMSE showed a very high level of agreement in spatial patterns as well as good quantitative agreement; the RMSE was predicted within accuracy of 4% of saturated soil moisture over 89% of the Australian land mass. Predicted and calculated R maps corresponded within accuracy of 10% over 61% of the continent. The strong correspondence between the predicted and calculated RMSE and R builds confidence in the retrieval error model and derived ASAR GM error estimates. The ASAR GM and Sentinel-1 have the same basic physical measurement characteristics, and therefore very similar retrieval error estimation method can be applied. Because of the expected improvements in radiometric resolution of the Sentinel-1 backscatter measurements, soil moisture estimation errors can be expected to be an order of magnitude less than those for ASAR GM. This opens the possibility for operationally available medium resolution soil moisture estimates with very well-specified errors that can be assimilated into hydrological or crop yield models, with potentially large benefits for land-atmosphere fluxes, crop growth, and water balance monitoring and modelling.

[1]  David M. Lawrence,et al.  Examining the Interaction of Growing Crops with Local Climate Using a Coupled Crop–Climate Model , 2009 .

[2]  W. Wagner,et al.  SOIL MOISTURE TIME SERIES FROM ACTIVE RADAR IN SUPPORT OF RUNOFF MONITORING ON LOCAL , CATCHMENT AND REGIONAL SCALE , 2007 .

[3]  G. Blöschl,et al.  Soil moisture updating by Ensemble Kalman Filtering in real-time flood forecasting , 2008 .

[4]  Wolfgang Wagner,et al.  The medium resolution soil moisture dataset: Overview of the SHARE ESA DUE TIGER project , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[5]  R. Todling,et al.  Data Assimilation in the Presence of Forecast Bias: The GEOS Moisture Analysis , 2000 .

[6]  Matthew F. McCabe,et al.  Hydrological consistency using multi-sensor remote sensing data for water and energy cycle studies , 2008 .

[7]  Wolfgang Wagner,et al.  The Potential of Sentinel-1 for Monitoring Soil Moisture with a High Spatial Resolution at Global Scale , 2009 .

[8]  I. D. Cresswell,et al.  An interim biogeographic regionalisation for Australia: a framework for setting priorities in the national reserves system cooperative , 1995 .

[9]  W. Wagner,et al.  Global monitoring of wetlands--the value of ENVISAT ASAR Global mode. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[10]  T. M. Crawford,et al.  Using a Soil Hydrology Model to Obtain Regionally Averaged Soil Moisture Values , 2000 .

[11]  Thomas J. Jackson,et al.  Soil moisture retrieval from AMSR-E , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[12]  T. Jackson,et al.  Improving Satellite-Based Rainfall Accumulation Estimates Using Spaceborne Surface Soil Moisture Retrievals , 2009 .

[13]  A. Barnston Correspondence among the correlation, RMSE, and Heidke forecast verification measures; refinement of the Heidke score , 1992 .

[14]  Wolfgang Wagner,et al.  Using ENVISAT ASAR Global Mode Data for Surface Soil Moisture Retrieval Over Oklahoma, USA , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[15]  Maurice Borgeaud,et al.  Monitoring soil moisture over the Canadian Prairies with the ERS scatterometer , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[16]  W. Wagner,et al.  A Method for Estimating Soil Moisture from ERS Scatterometer and Soil Data , 1999 .

[17]  Paul Snoeij,et al.  A Global Backscatter Model for C-Band SAR , 2010 .

[18]  P. Snoeij,et al.  Sentinel-1 - the radar mission for GMES operational land and sea services , 2007 .

[19]  Klaus Scipal,et al.  An Improved Soil Moisture Retrieval Algorithm for ERS and METOP Scatterometer Observations , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[20]  P Snoeij,et al.  Sentinel-1 radar mission: Status and performance , 2009, IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine.

[21]  M. S. Moran,et al.  Estimating soil moisture at the watershed scale with satellite-based radar and land surface models , 2004 .

[22]  Randal D. Koster,et al.  Bias reduction in short records of satellite soil moisture , 2004 .

[23]  Thomas R. H. Holmes,et al.  An evaluation of AMSR–E derived soil moisture over Australia , 2009 .

[24]  Yann Kerr,et al.  The SMOS Mission: New Tool for Monitoring Key Elements ofthe Global Water Cycle , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[25]  M. S. Moran,et al.  Appropriate scale of soil moisture retrieval from high resolution radar imagery for bare and minimally vegetated soils , 2008 .

[26]  Wolfgang Kinzelbach,et al.  Hydrological real-time modelling in the Zambezi river basin using satellite-based soil moisture and rainfall data , 2011 .

[27]  M. S. Moran,et al.  RADAR REMOTE SENSING FOR ESTIMATION OF SURFACE SOIL MOISTURE AT THE WATERSHED SCALE 2 RADARSAT ERS SAR ERS ENVISAT ASAR JERS ALOS PALSAR , 2006 .

[28]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Matching ERS scatterometer based soil moisture patterns with simulations of a conceptual dual layer hydrologic model over Austria , 2008 .

[29]  W. Wagner,et al.  Soil moisture from operational meteorological satellites , 2007 .

[30]  Peter Bauer-Gottwein,et al.  Combining satellite radar altimetry, SAR surface soil moisture and GRACE total storage changes for model calibration and validation in a large ungauged catchment , 2010 .

[31]  Iliana Mladenova,et al.  Validation of the ASAR Global Monitoring Mode Soil Moisture Product Using the NAFE'05 Data Set , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[32]  Bernard A. Engel,et al.  Daily streamflow modelling and assessment based on the curve‐number technique , 2002 .

[33]  W. Wagner,et al.  Improving runoff prediction through the assimilation of the ASCAT soil moisture product , 2010 .

[34]  Klaus Scipal,et al.  A possible solution for the problem of estimating the error structure of global soil moisture data sets , 2008 .

[35]  Yi Y. Liu,et al.  Developing an improved soil moisture dataset by blending passive and active microwave satellite-based retrievals , 2011 .

[36]  A. H. Murphy,et al.  The Coefficients of Correlation and Determination as Measures of performance in Forecast Verification , 1995 .

[37]  E. R. Cohen An Introduction to Error Analysis: The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements , 1998 .