TIME-EFFICIENT POST-DISASTER HOUSING RECONSTRUCTION WITH PREFABRICATED MODULAR STRUCTURES

With many natural disasters such as earthquakes, cyclones, bushfires and tsunamis destroying human habitats around the world, post-disaster housing reconstruction has become a critical topic. The current practice of post-disaster recon- struction consists of various approaches that carry affected homeowners from temporary shelters to permanent hous- ing. While temporary shelters may be provided within a matter of days as immediate disaster relief, permanent hous- ing can take years to complete. However, time is critical, as affected communities will need to restore their livelihoods as soon as possible. Prefabricated modular construction has the potential to drastically improve the time taken to pro- vide permanent housing. Due to this time-efficiency, which is an inherent characteristic of modular construction, it can be a desirable strategy for post-disaster housing reconstruction. This paper discusses how prefabricated modular struc- tures can provide a more time-efficient solution by analysing several present-day examples taken from published post- disaster housing reconstruction processes that have been carried out in different parts of the world. It also evaluates how other features of modular construction, such as ease of decommissioning and reusability, can add value to post- disaster reconstruction processes and organisations that contribute to the planning, design and construction stages of the reconstruction process. The suitability of modular construction will also be discussed in the context of the guidelines and best practice guides for post-disaster housing reconstruction published by international organisations. Through this analysis and discussion, it is concluded that prefabricated modular structures are a highly desirable time-efficient solu- tion to post-disaster housing reconstruction.

[1]  James P. Lewis,et al.  Natural Disasters and Vulnerability Analysis , 1981 .

[2]  Suzanne Wilkinson,et al.  Identifying factors affecting resource availability for post‐disaster reconstruction: a case study in China , 2011 .

[3]  Robert H. Crawford,et al.  Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy analysis of prefabricated reusable building modules , 2012 .

[4]  Murat Tas,et al.  Study on permanent housing production after 1999 earthquake in Kocaeli (Turkey) , 2010 .

[5]  Masi,et al.  Better Value in Steel VALUE AND BENEFITS ASSESSMENT OF MODULAR CONSTRUCTION , 2000 .

[6]  Suzanne Wilkinson,et al.  Resourcing challenges for post-disaster housing reconstruction: a comparative analysis , 2010 .

[7]  Paul Steele,et al.  Economic Challenges of Post-Tsunami Reconstruction in Sri Lanka , 2007 .

[8]  R. Mark Lawson,et al.  Application of Modular Construction in High-Rise Buildings , 2012 .

[9]  Shahnaz Arshad,et al.  Rural housing reconstruction program post-2005 earthquake : learning from the Pakistan experience : a manual for post-disaster housing program managers , 2013 .

[10]  Nilufer Tas,et al.  Permanent housing production process after 17 August 1999 Marmara Earthquake in Turkey , 2011 .

[11]  J. McIntosh The Implications of Post Disaster Recovery for Affordable Housing , 2013 .

[12]  James Schwab,et al.  Planning for post-disaster recovery and reconstruction , 1998 .

[13]  Andrew D.F. Price,et al.  Architect and contractor attitudes to waste minimisation , 2006 .