Searching for dark jets with displaced vertices using weakly supervised machine learning

If"dark quarks"from a confining hidden sector are produced at the LHC, they will shower and hadronize to dark sector hadrons, which may decay back to Standard Model particles within the detector, possibly resulting in a collimated spray of particles resembling a QCD jet. In this work we address scenarios in which dark hadrons decay with a measurable small displacement, such that the relevant background is dominated by heavy-flavor jets. Since dark sector parameters are largely unconstrained, and the precise properties of a dark QCD-like theory are difficult to compute or simulate reliably in any case, model-independent, data-based searches for such scenarios are desirable. We explore a search strategy employing weakly supervised machine learning to search for anomalous jets with displaced vertices. The method is tested on several toy signals, demonstrating the feasibility of such a search. Our approach has potential to outperform simple cut-based methods in some cases and has the advantage of being more model-independent.

[1]  Atlas Collaboration Search for non-resonant production of semi-visible jets using Run~2 data in ATLAS , 2023, 2305.18037.

[2]  Lei Wu,et al.  Probing dark QCD sector through the Higgs portal with machine learning at the LHC , 2023, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[3]  A. Mück,et al.  Boosting mono-jet searches with model-agnostic machine learning , 2022, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[4]  D. Kar,et al.  Theory, phenomenology, and experimental avenues for dark showers: a Snowmass 2021 report , 2022, The European Physical Journal C.

[5]  C. Collaboration,et al.  Search for resonant production of strongly coupled dark matter in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV , 2021, 2112.11125.

[6]  Maurizio Pierini,et al.  Autoencoders for semivisible jet detection , 2021, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[7]  Alexander Mück,et al.  Autoencoders for unsupervised anomaly detection in high energy physics , 2021, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[8]  David Shih,et al.  Comparing weak- and unsupervised methods for resonant anomaly detection , 2021, The European Physical Journal C.

[9]  Daniel A. Roberts,et al.  Topological obstructions to autoencoding , 2021, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[10]  Hoang Dai Nghia Nguyen,et al.  Dijet Resonance Search with Weak Supervision Using sqrt[s]=13  TeV pp Collisions in the ATLAS Detector. , 2020, Physical review letters.

[11]  Benjamin Nachman,et al.  Simulation-assisted decorrelation for resonant anomaly detection , 2020, Physical Review D.

[12]  D. Kar,et al.  Exploring jet substructure in semi-visible jets , 2020, SciPost Physics.

[13]  J. Arguin,et al.  Variational autoencoders for anomalous jet tagging , 2020, Physical Review D.

[14]  F. Kahlhoefer,et al.  Casting a graph net to catch dark showers , 2020, SciPost Physics.

[15]  M. Freytsis,et al.  Jet substructure from dark sector showers , 2020, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[16]  Hoang Dai Nghia Nguyen,et al.  Search for new resonances in mass distributions of jet pairs using 139 fb −1 of pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector , 2020 .

[17]  O. Amram,et al.  Tag N’ Train: a technique to train improved classifiers on unlabeled data , 2020, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[18]  F. Kahlhoefer,et al.  Strongly interacting dark sectors in the early Universe and at the LHC through a simplified portal , 2020, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[19]  H. Beauchesne,et al.  Classification of dark pion multiplets as dark matter candidates and collider phenomenology , 2019, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[20]  Johannes L. Schönberger,et al.  SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python , 2019, Nature Methods.

[21]  F. Kahlhoefer,et al.  Strongly interacting dark sectors in the early Universe and at the LHC through a simplified portal , 2019, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[22]  B. Nachman,et al.  Extending the search for new resonances with machine learning , 2019, Physical Review D.

[23]  C. Collaboration,et al.  Search for new particles decaying to a jet and an emerging jet , 2018, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[24]  H. Beauchesne,et al.  Dark matter in Hidden Valley models with stable and unstable light dark mesons , 2018, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[25]  D. Shih,et al.  Searching for new physics with deep autoencoders , 2018, Physical Review D.

[26]  Gregor Kasieczka,et al.  QCD or what? , 2018, SciPost Physics.

[27]  Patrick T. Komiske,et al.  Learning to classify from impure samples with high-dimensional data , 2018, Physical Review D.

[28]  Myeonghun Park,et al.  Tagging a jet from a dark sector with jet substructures at colliders , 2017, Physical Review D.

[29]  B. Nachman,et al.  Classification without labels: learning from mixed samples in high energy physics , 2017, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[30]  H. K. Lou,et al.  LHC searches for dark sector showers , 2017, 1707.05326.

[31]  M. Freytsis,et al.  (Machine) learning to do more with less , 2017, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[32]  L. Dery,et al.  Weakly supervised classification in high energy physics , 2017, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[33]  C. Collaboration,et al.  Search for massive resonances decaying into WW, WZ or ZZ bosons in proton-proton collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV , 2016, 1612.09159.

[34]  H. K. Lou,et al.  Semivisible Jets: Dark Matter Undercover at the LHC. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[35]  D. Stolarski,et al.  Emerging jets , 2015, 1502.05409.

[36]  Peter Skands,et al.  An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 , 2014, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[37]  C. Collaboration,et al.  Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker , 2014, 1405.6569.

[38]  R. Frederix,et al.  The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations , 2014, 1405.0301.

[39]  Shih-Fu Chang,et al.  On Learning with Label Proportions , 2014, ArXiv.

[40]  S. Forte,et al.  Parton distributions with QED corrections , 2013, 1308.0598.

[41]  J. Favereau,et al.  DELPHES 3: a modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment , 2013, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[42]  P. Schwaller,et al.  Scale of dark QCD , 2013, 1306.4676.

[43]  W Waltenberger,et al.  RAVE—A Detector-Independent Toolkit to Reconstruct Vertices , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[44]  Georgios Choudalakis,et al.  On hypothesis testing, trials factor, hypertests and the BumpHunter , 2011, 1101.0390.

[45]  Torbjörn Sjöstrand,et al.  Visible effects of invisible Hidden Valley radiation , 2010, 1006.2911.

[46]  Alexander J. Smola,et al.  Estimating labels from label proportions , 2008, ICML '08.

[47]  M. Cacciari,et al.  The anti-$k_t$ jet clustering algorithm , 2008, 0802.1189.

[48]  R. Frühwirth,et al.  Adaptive vertex fitting , 2007 .

[49]  M. Strassler,et al.  Echoes of a hidden valley at hadron colliders , 2006, hep-ph/0604261.

[50]  M. L. Angelini Simulations , 2021, Learning Through Simulations.

[51]  A. P. D. Jong,et al.  ) Measurement of the flavour composition of dijet events in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector , 2013 .