The pragmatic meanings conveyed by function words in Chinese sentences: An ERP study

Abstract In the study, we aimed to investigate the cognitive processing of the Chinese sentences utilizing the function words “CAI” or “JIU” through ERP methods, and to provide further evidence to the theory of function word in Chinese linguistics. In the experiment, we constructed four types of materials (Type 1–Type 4): simple sentences, complex sentences without numerals, complex sentences with numerals and sentences with fixed expressions. There were corresponding correct and incorrect sentences in each type. It was observed that the incorrect sentences of the first two types elicited significant N400 and P600 effects, and the complex syntactic structures in the second type made their amplitudes larger. This result suggests that “CAI” and “JIU” can constrain sentence meanings within certain boundaries, and the contrast between the preset context and actual context can be further distinguished when the preset context is described explicitly. The unexpected “CAI” or “JIU” in the sentences in Type 3 elicited a larger P3b as compared with the expected ones. This indicates that the relationship between the preset and actual contexts in quantity is constrained and such a constraint is further converted to the direct quantitative comparison between the numerals. Moreover, the widely distributed and sustaining CPS (closure positive shift) evoked by the violations of fixed expressions denotes that the fixed prosodic boundaries are broken. These results suggest that in certain conditions, the function words “CAI” and “JIU” can also convey pragmatic meanings beyond their syntactic functions. It further confirms the theory of function word in Chinese linguistics.

[1]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Syntax-related ERP-effects in Dutch. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[2]  A. Friederici,et al.  Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. , 1993, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[3]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  Neural correlates of processing syntactic, semantic, and thematic relationships in sentences , 2006 .

[4]  J. Polich Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Discourse, Syntax, and Prosody: The Brain Reveals an Immediate Interaction , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  D. Caplan,et al.  Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[7]  Peter Ullsperger,et al.  Processing of multi-dimensional stimuli: P300 component of the event-related brain potential during mental comparison of compound digits , 1995, Biological Psychology.

[8]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Semantic Integration in Sentences and Discourse: Evidence from the N400 , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[10]  Kai Alter,et al.  How prosody can influence sentence perception , 2004 .

[11]  S. Zhou,et al.  Spatiotemporal Analysis of ERP During Chinese Idiom Comprehension , 2004, Brain Topography.

[12]  Ulrike Toepel,et al.  Catching the news: Processing strategies in listening to dialogs as measured by ERPs , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[13]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[14]  A D Friederici,et al.  Prosodic Boundaries, Comma Rules, and Brain Responses: The Closure Positive Shift in ERPs as a Universal Marker for Prosodic Phrasing in Listeners and Readers , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[15]  H. Kolk,et al.  An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic anomalies. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[16]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for differential processing of numerical quantity and order in humans. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[17]  A. Friederici,et al.  Syntactic Gender and Semantic Expectancy: ERPs Reveal Early Autonomy and Late Interaction , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  Xiaolin Zhou,et al.  The semantic processing of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: An ERP study , 2007, Brain Research.

[19]  Karsten Steinhauer Electrophysiological correlates of prosody and punctuation , 2003, Brain and Language.

[20]  G. Mulder,et al.  When syntax meets semantics. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[21]  Z. Ye,et al.  Involvement of cognitive control in sentence comprehension: Evidence from ERPs , 2008, Brain Research.

[22]  Jiajin Yuan,et al.  N400 lexicality effect in highly blurred Chinese words: evidence for automatic processing , 2008, Neuroreport.

[23]  P. Hagoort,et al.  Integration of Word Meaning and World Knowledge in Language Comprehension , 2004, Science.

[24]  Ulrike Toepel,et al.  Inadequate and infrequent are not alike: ERPs to deviant prosodic patterns in spoken sentence comprehension , 2008, Brain and Language.

[25]  H. Neville,et al.  Natural speech processing: An analysis using event-related brain potentials , 1991, Psychobiology.

[26]  L. Osterhout,et al.  The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2005 .

[27]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  M. Kutas,et al.  Expect the Unexpected: Event-related Brain Response to Morphosyntactic Violations , 1998 .

[29]  A. Friederici,et al.  Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: early and late event-related brain potential effects. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  H. Shu,et al.  Spoken word recognition in context: Evidence from Chinese ERP analyses , 2006, Brain and Language.

[31]  Yue-jia Luo,et al.  Effects of Semantic Discrimination of Chinese Words on N400 Component of Event-Related Potentials , 1999, Perceptual and motor skills.

[32]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[33]  H. Kolk,et al.  Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials , 2003, Brain and Language.

[34]  John C J Hoeks,et al.  Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[35]  A. Friederici,et al.  Semantic and syntactic processing in Chinese sentence comprehension: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2006, Brain Research.

[36]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  E. Gibson,et al.  The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty , 2000 .

[39]  Gina R. Kuperberg,et al.  Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax , 2007, Brain Research.