Validation of intensive care unit-acquired infection surveillance in the Italian SPIN-UTI network.

Validity is one of the most critical factors concerning surveillance of nosocomial infections (NIs). This article describes the first validation study of the Italian Nosocomial Infections Surveillance in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) project (SPIN-UTI) surveillance data. The objective was to validate infection data and thus to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of NI data reported on patients in the ICUs participating in the SPIN-UTI network. A validation study was performed at the end of the surveillance period. All medical records including all clinical and laboratory data were reviewed retrospectively by the trained physicians of the validation team and a positive predictive value (PPV), a negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Eight ICUs (16.3%) were randomly chosen from all 49 SPIN-UTI ICUs for the validation study. In total, the validation team reviewed 832 patient charts (27.3% of the SPIN-UTI patients). The PPV was 83.5% and the NPV was 97.3%. The overall sensitivity was 82.3% and overall specificity was 97.2%. Over- and under-reporting of NIs were related to misinterpretation of the case definitions and deviations from the protocol despite previous training and instructions. The results of this study are useful to identify methodological problems within a surveillance system and have been used to plan retraining for surveillance personnel and to design and implement the second phase of the SPIN-UTI project.

[1]  R. Gaynes,et al.  Accuracy of Reporting Nosocomial Infections In Intensive-Care–Unit Patients to the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System: A Pilot Study , 1998, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[2]  M. Schumacher,et al.  Validation of Surveillance in the Intensive Care Unit Component of the German Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System , 2007, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[3]  O. Lyytikäinen,et al.  Validation of surgical site infection surveillance in orthopedic procedures. , 2007, American journal of infection control.

[4]  P. Gastmeier European perspective on surveillance. , 2007, The Journal of hospital infection.

[5]  H. Rüden,et al.  Ten years of KISS: the most important requirements for success. , 2008, The Journal of hospital infection.

[6]  T. Eckmanns,et al.  Is there an association between nosocomial infection rates and bacterial cross transmissions?* , 2010, Critical care medicine.

[7]  H. Rüden,et al.  Effectiveness of a nationwide nosocomial infection surveillance system for reducing nosocomial infections. , 2006, The Journal of hospital infection.

[8]  M. Schumacher,et al.  Experience With Two Validation Methods in a Prevalence Survey on Nosocomial Infections , 1998, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[9]  S. van den Hof,et al.  Validation of Surgical Site Infection Surveillance in The Netherlands , 2007, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[10]  A Agodi,et al.  Building a benchmark through active surveillance of intensive care unit-acquired infections: the Italian network SPIN-UTI. , 2010, The Journal of hospital infection.